Literature DB >> 31879464

Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) in revision Hip and knee arthroplasty- A review of the literature.

Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa1, Om Prakash Sharma2, Sruthi Priyavadana3, Senthil Sambandam4, Jorge A Villafuerte1.   

Abstract

Unexpected positive intraoperative culture (UPIC) in revision hip and knee arthroplasty has a prevalence of 10.5%, there is no consensus in the literature on how to interpret them and how to treat them. Our literature review showed that most authors would consider two or more positive cultures as significant and usually treat them with culture specific antibiotics for 4-6 weeks. A single positive intraoperative culture can or cannot be significant depending on the virulence of the organism, hence taking multiple tissue samples in and around the joint is recommended. All failed arthroplasty cases must be evaluated preoperatively according to musculoskeletal infection society criteria (MSIS) to rule out the possibility of infection as an etiology for failure of the arthroplasty. Most authors reported that large majority of these UPIC were from a low virulence organism. Our review showed that the implant survival is more than 85% with 4-6 weeks of antibiotic treatment.
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aseptic failure; Prosthetic joint infection; Revision arthroplasty; Unexpected positive culture

Year:  2019        PMID: 31879464      PMCID: PMC6919374          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.06.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  37 in total

1.  The significance of positive cultures from orthopedic fixation devices in the absence of clinical infection.

Authors:  F W Moussa; J O Anglen; J C Gehrke; G Christensen; W A Simpson
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1997-09

2.  Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in aseptic revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anas Saleh; Albair Guirguis; Alison K Klika; Lucileia Johnson; Carlos A Higuera; Wael K Barsoum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in deep infections after total hip arthroplasty: differential diagnosis between infectious and non-infectious loosening.

Authors:  C Kamme; L Lindberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group.

Authors:  B L Atkins; N Athanasou; J J Deeks; D W Crook; H Simpson; T E Peto; P McLardy-Smith; A R Berendt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Diagnosis of periprosthetic infection.

Authors:  Thomas W Bauer; Javad Parvizi; Naomi Kobayashi; Viktor Krebs
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Timothy L Tan; Karan Goswami; Carlos Higuera; Craig Della Valle; Antonia F Chen; Noam Shohat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The value of aspiration of the hip joint before revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R L Barrack; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections.

Authors:  D T Tsukayama; R Estrada; R B Gustilo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Incidence of low-grade infection in aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dirk Jan F Moojen; Gijs van Hellemondt; H Charles Vogely; Bart J Burger; Geert H I M Walenkamp; Niek J A Tulp; B Wim Schreurs; Frank R A J de Meulemeester; Corrie S Schot; Ingrid van de Pol; Takaaki Fujishiro; Leo M Schouls; Thomas W Bauer; Wouter J A Dhert
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Missed low-grade infection in suspected aseptic loosening has no consequences for the survival of total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Willemijn Boot; Dirk Jan F Moojen; Els Visser; A Mechteld Lehr; Tommy S De Windt; Gijs Van Hellemondt; Jan Geurts; Niek J A Tulp; B Wim Schreurs; Bart J Burger; Wouter J A Dhert; Debby Gawlitta; H Charles Vogely
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence, interpretation, and management of unexpected positive cultures in revision TKA: a systematic review.

Authors:  Johannes Kloos; Koen Vander Linden; Stijn Vermote; Pieter Berger; Hilde Vandenneucker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Microbiological Advantages of Open Incisional Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Marcel Niemann; Ellen Otto; Karl F Braun; Frank Graef; Sufian S Ahmad; Sebastian Hardt; Ulrich Stöckle; Andrej Trampuz; Sebastian Meller
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Unexpected positive intraoperative cultures (UPIC) at index osseointegration do not lead to increased postoperative infectious events.

Authors:  Jason S Hoellwarth; Taylor J Reif; Michael W Henry; Andy O Miller; Austin C Kaidi; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2022-07-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.