| Literature DB >> 31877986 |
Sung Hyun Im1, Hoe Taek Jung1, Myoung Jin Ho1, Jeong Eun Lee1, Hyung Tae Kim1, Dong Yoon Kim1, Hyo Chun Lee1, Yong Seok Choi1, Myung Joo Kang1.
Abstract
A novel nanocrystal system of montelukast (MTK) was designed to improve the transdermal delivery, while ensuring chemical stability of the labile compound. MTK nanocrystal suspension was fabricated using acid-base neutralization and ultra-sonication technique and was characterized as follows: approximately 100 nm in size, globular shape, and amorphous state. The embedding of MTK nanocrystals into xanthan gum-based hydrogel caused little changes in the size, shape, and crystalline state of the nanocrystal. The in vitro drug release profile from the nanocrystal hydrogel was comparable to that of the conventional hydrogel because of the rapid dissolution pattern of the drug nanocrystals. The drug degradation under visible exposure (400-800 nm, 600,000 lux·h) was markedly reduced in case of nanocrystal hydrogel, yielding only 30% and 50% amount of cis-isomer and sulfoxide as the major degradation products, as compared to those of drug alkaline solution. Moreover, there was no marked pharmacokinetic difference between the nanocrystal and the conventional hydrogels, exhibiting equivalent extent and rate of drug absorption after topical administration in rats. Therefore, this novel nanocrystal system can be a potent tool for transdermal delivery of MTK in the treatment of chronic asthma or seasonal allergies, with better patient compliance, especially in children and elderly.Entities:
Keywords: montelukast; nanocrystal hydrogel; nanocrystal suspension; photo-stability; transdermal delivery
Year: 2019 PMID: 31877986 PMCID: PMC7022715 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12010018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Effect of different types of stabilizers on the crystal size, homogeneity, and dispersibility of MTK nanocrystals in the aqueous vehicle.
| Stabilizer (% | Crystal Size (nm) 2 | Homogeneity (PDI) 2,3 | Dispersibility 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| - 5 | 1614.3 ± 402.5 | 0.961 ± 0.067 | Aggregated |
| PVP K30 | 129.7 ± 1.1 | 0.281 ± 0.007 | Re-dispersible |
| Kollidon VA64 | 587.1 ± 177.7 | 0.556 ± 0.119 | Re-dispersible |
| HPMC-2910 | 319.3 ± 2.1 | 0.308 ± 0.065 | Aggregated |
| Poloxamer-188 | 89.9 ± 0.3 | 0.269 ± 0.006 | Aggregated |
| Poloxamer-407 | 100.6 ± 1.0 | 0.353 ± 0.046 | Aggregated |
| Tween 20 | 89.9 ± 0.4 | 0.290 ± 0.002 | Aggregated |
| Tween 80 | 97.6 ± 0.6 | 0.275 ± 0.011 | Aggregated |
| Kolliphor RH40 | 97.9 ± 0.6 | 0.451 ± 0.007 | Aggregated |
| Cremophor EL | 117.6 ± 0.5 | 0.184 ± 0.006 | Aggregated |
| Solutol HS15 | 145.7 ± 0.8 | 0.251 ± 0.009 | Aggregated |
1 The concentration of stabilizers in the formulation was set to 0.5% w/v. 2 Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). 3 Polydispersity index, calculated by dividing weight average molecular weight by number average molecular weight. 4 Visually assessed after a week-long storage at 40 °C. 5 Prepared with no stabilizer.
Figure 1Effect of process variables (a, ultra-sonication power; b, sonication time; c, drug concentration; d, PVP K30 concentration in the nanosuspension) on the median diameter and homogeneity of MTK nanocrystals fabricated by acid-base neutralization and ultra-sonication method. Note: (a) The sonication time, drug concentration, and PVP K30 concentration were fixed to 6 min, 10 mg/mL, and 0.5 w/v%, respectively. (b) The sonication powder, drug concentration, and PVP K30 concentration were fixed to 33 Watts, 10 mg/mL, and 0.5 w/v%, respectively. (c) The sonication powder, sonication time, and PVP K30 concentration were fixed to 33 Watts, 6 min, and 0.5 w/v%, respectively. (d) The sonication powder, sonication time, and drug concentration were fixed to 33 Watts, 6 min, and 10 mg/mL, respectively. Three batches of each sample were prepared, and the data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 2Morphological and physical characteristics of the MTK nanocrystal suspension and the hydrogel. SEM (scanning electron microscope) images of the MTK nanocrystals (A) suspended in aqueous suspension or (B) embedded in the hydrogel. (C) XRD (X-ray diffraction) patterns and (D) DSC (differential scanning calorimeter) curves of (a) MTK-Na powder, (b) MTK free-acid powder, (c) MTK nanocrystal suspension, and (d) MTK nanocrystal hydrogel.
Physicochemical characteristics of the optimized MTK nanocrystal suspension.
| Parameters | MTK Nanocrystal Suspension |
|---|---|
| MTK concentration (mg/mL) | 10.93 ± 0.23 |
| Suspended (mg/mL) | 10.88 ± 0.20 |
| Dissolved (mg/mL) | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| Particle size (nm) | 102.3 ± 3.0 |
| PDI | 0.238 ± 0.056 |
| Zeta potential (mV) | −3.6 ± 0.7 |
| pH | 4.1 ± 0.1 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 3In vitro dissolution profiles of MTK from nanocrystal or conventional formulations under sink condition. Note: The sink condition was continued by adding 0.5% w/v of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) to 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline. Released (%) was calculated by dividing the amount of drug dissolved at determined time by the amount of drug loaded, and then multiplying by 100. The data are expressed as mean value (n = 3) and the SD is expressed as error bar on each point.
Figure 4Drug remaining, and formation of cis-isomer and sulfoxide in the MTK nanocrystal or conventional formulations under light exposure, (A) in the absence of Sunset Yellow FCF and (B) in the presence of the photo-stabilizer. The data is represented as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5Plasma concentration–time profiles of MTK following single administration of the nanocrystal hydrogel or conventional hydrogel on the dorsal skin of healthy rats at a dose of 15 mg/kg. Each point represents mean ± standard error (n = 6).
Pharmacokinetic parameters of MTK following dorsal application of the nanocrystal hydrogel or conventional hydrogel in rats.
| Parameters | Nanocrystal Hydrogel | Conventional Hydrogel |
|---|---|---|
| AUC(0–24 h) (ng·h/mL) | 20.1 ± 5.2 | 23.5 ± 7.0 |
| AUC(0–inf) (ng·h/mL) | 20.8 ± 5.7 | 26.6 ± 8.1 |
| 5.9 ± 2.1 | 5.3 ± 2.2 | |
| 0.5 | 2.0 | |
| t1/2 (h) | 9.7 ± 3.3 | 6.2 ± 5.4 |
Note: Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (n = 6). Abbreviations: AUC0–24 h), area under the plasma concentration–time curve from zero to 24 h; AUC(0–inf), area under the plasma concentration–time curve to infinite time; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; Tmax, time to reach maximum plasma concentration; T1/2, elimination half-life of the drug.