| Literature DB >> 31877754 |
Guillermo Solache-Berrocal1,2, Ana María Barral-Varela3, Sheila Areces-Rodríguez4, Alejandro Junco-Vicente4, Aitana Vallina-Álvarez5,6, María Daniela Corte-Torres5, José Manuel Valdivielso2,7, Juan Carlos Llosa4, César Morís1,2,4, María Martín1,2,4, Isabel Rodríguez1,2.
Abstract
Aortic valve stenosis is a serious disease with increasing prevalence in developed countries. Research aimed at uncovering the molecular mechanisms behind its main cause, aortic valve calcification, is thus crucial for the development of future therapies. It is frequently difficult to measure the extent of mineralisation in soft tissues and some methods require the destruction of the sample. Micro-computed tomography (µCT), a non-destructive technique, was used to quantify the density and volume of calcium deposits on cusps from 57 explanted aortic valves. Conventional and immunostaining techniques were used to characterise valve tissue degeneration and the inflammatory and osteogenic stage with several markers. Although most of the analysed cusps came from severe stenosis patients, the µCT parameter bone volume/tissue volume ratio distinguished several degrees of mineralisation that correlated with the degree of structural change in the tissue and the amount of macrophage infiltration as determined by CD68 immunohistochemistry. Interestingly, exosomal markers CD63 and Alix co-localised with macrophage infiltration surrounding calcium deposits, suggesting that those vesicles could be produced at least in part by these immune cells. In conclusion, we have shown that the ex vivo assessment of aortic valve mineralisation with µCT reflects the molecular and cellular changes in pathological valves during progression towards stenosis. Thus, our results give additional validity to quantitative μCT as a convenient laboratory tool for basic research on this type of cardiovascular calcification.Entities:
Keywords: aortic stenosis; calcific aortic valve disease; exosomes; histology; immunohistochemistry; macrophages; micro-computed tomography; valvular calcification
Year: 2019 PMID: 31877754 PMCID: PMC7019701 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9010029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Baseline characteristics of the patients included in the study.
| Total | Type of Aortic Valve Disease | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regurgitation | Stenosis | Mixed | |||
| Age, years | 69.6 (11.1) | 70.5 (7.6) | 70.7 (10.8) | 66.0 (13.1) | 0.415 |
| Sex | |||||
| Male | 33 (57.9) | 5 (83.3) | 20 (52.6) | 8 (61.5) | 0.425 |
| Female | 24 (42.1) | 1 (16.7) | 18 (47.4) | 5 (38.5) | |
| Valve Anatomy | |||||
| Tricuspid | 41 (71.9) | 6 (100.0) | 27 (71.1) | 8 (61.5) | 0.188 |
| Bicuspid | 11 (19.3) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (15.8) | 5 (38.5) | |
| Other | 5 (8.8) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (13.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 29.6 (4.3) | 29.3 (3.3) | 29.8 (4.1) | 29.3 (5.5) | 0.913 |
| Smoker Status | |||||
| Non-Smoker | 35 (61.4) | 2 (33.3) | 24 (63.1) | 9 (69.2) | 0.108 |
| Former Smoker | 13 (22.8) | 4 (66.7) | 8 (21.1) | 1 (7.7) | |
| Current Smoker | 9 (15.8) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (15.8) | 3 (23.1) | |
| Hypertension | |||||
| Yes | 40 (70.2) | 6 (100.0) | 22 (57.9) | 12 (92.3) | 0.019 |
| No | 17 (29.8) | 0 (0.0) | 16 (42.1) | 1 (7.7) | |
| Hyperlipidaemia | |||||
| Yes | 25 (43.9) | 3 (50.0) | 17 (44.7) | 5 (38.5) | 0.923 |
| No | 32 (56.1) | 3 (50.0) | 21 (55.3) | 8 (61.5) | |
| Diabetes | |||||
| Yes | 11 (19.3) | 1 (16.7) | 8 (21.1) | 2 (15.4) | 1.000 |
| No | 46 (80.7) | 5 (83.3) | 30 (79.8) | 11 (84.6) | |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 76.3 (18.9) | 63.9 (13.0) | 76.1 (19.1) | 83.0 (18.5) | 0.121 |
| Echocardiography | |||||
| Mean Gradient, mmHg | 47.3 (15.0) | 28.2 (25.1) | 50.9 (11.6) | 43.4 (15.6) | 0.007 |
| Peak Jet Velocity, m/s | 4.3 (0.8) | 3.2 (1.5) | 4.5 (0.5) | 4.2 (0.8) | 0.002 |
| LVEF | |||||
| Preserved | 48 (84.2) | 5 (83.3) | 30 (79.8) | 13 (100.0) | 0.731 |
| Mildly Reduced | 2 (3.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Moderately Reduced | 5 (8.8) | 1 (16.7) | 4 (10.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Severely Reduced | 2 (3.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
Values from qualitative variables are presented as frequency (percentage) and comparisons between groups were performed using Fisher’s exact test. Values from quantitative variables are presented as mean (standard deviation) and comparisons between groups were performed using a two-tailed Student’s t test or ANOVA, as appropriate. BMI = Body mass index; eGFR = Estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF = left ventricle ejection fraction.
Figure 1Distribution of BMD and BV/TV in the study population. Quantile-quantile plots of the bone mineral density (BMD) (A) and bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) (B) values obtained for the 57 cusps analysed by micro-computed tomography (μCT). (C) Correlation between BMD and BV/TV values. Statistical significance (p-value) of the correlation and Spearman’s coefficient (ρ) are shown.
Comparison of bone volume/tissue volume values according to several clinical characteristics of the patients.
| BV/TV | ||
|---|---|---|
| % | ||
| Sex | ||
| Male | 4.0 (3.6) | 0.379 |
| Female | 4.8 (2.9) | |
| Diagnosis | ||
| Stenosis | 5.1 (3.5) | 0.006 |
| Regurgitation | 0.3 (0.5) | |
| Mixed | 3.8 (2.3) | |
| Valve Anatomy | ||
| Tricuspid | 3.6 (3.0) | 0.020 |
| Bicuspid | 6.7 (3.0) | |
| Other | 4.9 (4.4) | |
| Ascending Aorta | ||
| Normal | 3.8 (3.0) | < 0.001 |
| Dilated | 8.7 (2.6) | |
| Hypertension | ||
| Yes | 3.6 (2.9) | 0.070 |
| No | 6.0 (3.7) | |
| Hyperlipidaemia | ||
| Yes | 4.2 (3.5) | 0.816 |
| No | 4.4 (3.2) | |
| Diabetes | ||
| Yes | 4.4 (3.3) | 0.472 |
| No | 3.9 (3.6) | |
| Chronic Kidney Disease | ||
| Yes | 3.8 (3.5) | 0.574 |
| No | 4.5 (3.3) | |
Values are expressed as mean (standard deviation) and differences between groups were statistically analysed with a two-tailed Student’s t test or ANOVA, as appropriate. BV/TV = bone volume/tissue volume.
Figure 2Relationship between micro-computed tomography measurements and the degree of valve tissue structural change: (A) Representative images of orcein-stained sections from each stage of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) according to Warren and Yong’s score. Collagen fibres were stained blue; elastin fibres, purple; and amorphous matrix from calcium deposits, light green. Arrowhead indicates a disruption in elastic fibres. Scalebar = 500 μm. (B) Bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) values for each stage of CAVD. p-value for trend (Jonckheere-Terpstra’s test) is shown. Median and interquartile range are represented.
Figure 3Representative images of immunohistochemistries for BMP2, CD31, CD68, CD63 and Alix on both calcified and non-calcified regions of aortic valve cusps. Images of a haematoxylin and eosin stain are shown to facilitate recognition of calcium deposits as acellular and eosinophilic areas with an amorphous extracellular matrix. LV = left ventricular side; Ao = aortic side.
Figure 4Relationship between macrophage infiltration and aortic valve calcification progression. (A) Correlation between CD68-positive area and bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV) values. Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ) and statistical significance (p-value) are shown. (B) CD68-positive area in each stage of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) according to Warren and Yong’s score. p-value for trend (Jonckheere-Terpstra’s test) is shown. Median and interquartile range are represented.