Kubilay Barutcigil1, Çağatay Barutcigil2, Esra Kul1,3, Mehmet Mustafa Özarslan1, Ulviye Sebnem Buyukkaplan1. 1. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. 2. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. 3. Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of various surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A novel hybrid ceramic restorative material (Vita Enamic) was used in this study. Sixty resin block specimens were prepared and separated into six groups for each surface treatment method (n = 10); group 1: control group, no treatment applied; group 2: sandblasted by 30 μm silicate-coated alumina particles (CoJet Sandblasting); group 3: 50 μm Al2 O3 sandblasting; group 4: 10% hydrofluoric acid; group 5: no surface treatment + universal adhesive (3M Single Bond Universal); group 6: 200 mJ, 10 Hz 2W Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment. For each specimen, surface roughness measurements in noncontact mode were taken after the surface treatments using a portable surface texture-measuring machine. A self-adhesive resin cement (3M U200) was applied on every surface treated with the help of a cylindrical mold (2 × 4 mm) and was filled gradually. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal test machine, and one-way ANOVA and a Duncan test (p = 0.05) were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Mean values of the shear bond strength varied between 7.75 and 10.73 MPa. Bond strength values were enhanced by all surface treatment methods compared to the control group. The difference between group 5 and the control group (p < 0.05) was statistically significant, whereas there were no considerable differences between other treatment methods. CONCLUSION: Surface treatments of hybrid ceramic resin blocks could enhance the bond strength to resin cement; however, using Single Bond Universal without surface treatment showed a higher bond strength value.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of various surface treatment methods on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A novel hybrid ceramic restorative material (Vita Enamic) was used in this study. Sixty resin block specimens were prepared and separated into six groups for each surface treatment method (n = 10); group 1: control group, no treatment applied; group 2: sandblasted by 30 μm silicate-coated alumina particles (CoJet Sandblasting); group 3: 50 μm Al2 O3 sandblasting; group 4: 10% hydrofluoric acid; group 5: no surface treatment + universal adhesive (3M Single Bond Universal); group 6: 200 mJ, 10 Hz 2W Er,Cr:YSGG laser treatment. For each specimen, surface roughness measurements in noncontact mode were taken after the surface treatments using a portable surface texture-measuring machine. A self-adhesive resin cement (3M U200) was applied on every surface treated with the help of a cylindrical mold (2 × 4 mm) and was filled gradually. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal test machine, and one-way ANOVA and a Duncan test (p = 0.05) were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Mean values of the shear bond strength varied between 7.75 and 10.73 MPa. Bond strength values were enhanced by all surface treatment methods compared to the control group. The difference between group 5 and the control group (p < 0.05) was statistically significant, whereas there were no considerable differences between other treatment methods. CONCLUSION: Surface treatments of hybrid ceramic resin blocks could enhance the bond strength to resin cement; however, using Single Bond Universal without surface treatment showed a higher bond strength value.
Authors: Verónica García-Sanz; Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo; Omel Mendoza-Yero; Miguel Carbonell-Leal; Alberto Albaladejo; José María Montiel-Company; Carlos Bellot-Arcís Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-02 Impact factor: 3.240