Literature DB >> 31874347

Partial breast irradiation with the 1.5 T MR-Linac: First patient treatment and analysis of electron return and stream effects.

Marcel Nachbar1, David Mönnich2, Simon Boeke3, Cihan Gani3, Nicola Weidner3, Vanessa Heinrich3, Monica Lo Russo4, Lorenzo Livi4, Jasmin Winter1, Savas Tsitsekidis1, Oliver Dohm1, Daniela Thorwarth2, Daniel Zips5, Chiara De-Colle6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: External beam partial breast irradiation (PBI) provides equal oncological outcomes compared to whole breast irradiation when applied to patients with low risk tumours. Recently, linacs with an integrated magnetic resonance image-guidance system have become clinically available. Here we report the first-in-human PBI performed at the 1.5 T MR-Linac, with a focus on clinical feasibility and investigation of the air electron stream effect (ESE) and the electron return effect (ERE) in the presence of the 1.5 T magnetic field, which might influence the dose on the chin (out-of-field dose, due to the ESE), the skin and the lung/chest wall interface (in-field dose, ERE).
METHODS: A 59 years old patient affected by a 15 mm unifocal grade 1 carcinoma not special type of the right breast staged pT1c pN0 cM0 was planned and treated at Unity 1.5 T MR-Linac. To investigate the ERE and the ESE, an MR-Linac treatment plan was simulated without considering the 1.5 T B field using a research version of Monaco (V. 5.19.03). In vivo dosimetry was performed using Gafchromic® EBT3 films placed on top and underneath a 1 cm bolus which was placed on the patient's chin. The plans with and without 1.5 T magnetic field were compared in terms of dose to the chin, to the skin and to the interface lung/chest wall. Finally, the dose on the chin measured with the in vivo dosimetry was compared with the dose calculated by Monaco.
RESULTS: PBI using the 1.5 T MR-Linac was successfully performed with a 7 MV photon 7-beams IMRT step-and-shoot plan. The treatment was well tolerated, the patient developed a slight acute toxicity, i.e. breast skin erythema and breast oedema CTC V.4 grade 1. The plan with 1.5 T magnetic field documented a fractional dose of 0.17 Gy in the chin area (2.6 Gy in 15 fractions), which was reduced to 0.05 Gy (0.75 in 15 fractions) by the presence of 1 cm bolus. The simulated plan without magnetic field showed a dose reduced by 2.3 Gy in the chin area. With the in vivo dosimetry a fractional dose of, respectively, 0.12 Gy and 0.034 Gy on top and underneath the bolus were measured (1.8 and 0.51 Gy in 15 fractions). The plan with 1.5 T magnetic field showed a skin D2 of 40 Gy and a skin V35 of 40.2%, which were reduced to, respectively, 39.7 Gy and 24.9% in the simulation without magnetic field. At the interface lung/chest there were no differences in DVH statistics.
CONCLUSION: PBI with the 1.5 T MR-Linac was performed for the first time. ESE is accurately calculated by the treatment planning system, can be effectively reduced with a 1 cm bolus and is comparable to dose of cone beam-CT based position verification. The additional dose caused by ERE is not associated with an increased risk of acute toxicity.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electron return effect; Electron stream effect; MR-Linac; Partial breast irradiation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31874347     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.11.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  18 in total

1.  Initial Feasibility and Clinical Implementation of Daily MR-Guided Adaptive Head and Neck Cancer Radiation Therapy on a 1.5T MR-Linac System: Prospective R-IDEAL 2a/2b Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovation.

Authors:  Brigid A McDonald; Sastry Vedam; Jinzhong Yang; Jihong Wang; Pamela Castillo; Belinda Lee; Angela Sobremonte; Sara Ahmed; Yao Ding; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Peter Balter; Neil Hughes; Daniela Thorwarth; Marcel Nachbar; Marielle E P Philippens; Chris H J Terhaard; Daniel Zips; Simon Böke; Musaddiq J Awan; John Christodouleas; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Influence of beam quality on reference dosimetry correction factors in magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stefan Pojtinger; Marcel Nachbar; Ralf-Peter Kapsch; Daniela Thorwarth
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-27

Review 3.  MR-Guided Radiotherapy: The Perfect Partner for Immunotherapy?

Authors:  Juliane Hörner-Rieber; Sebastian Klüter; Jürgen Debus; Gosse Adema; Marleen Ansems; Marcel Verheij
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy for breast cancer: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Sarah Elliott; Alexandra Berlangieri; Jason Wasiak; Michael Chao; Farshad Foroudi
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 5.  Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging on hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerators: Perspective on technical and clinical validation.

Authors:  Daniela Thorwarth; Matthias Ege; Marcel Nachbar; David Mönnich; Cihan Gani; Daniel Zips; Simon Boeke
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-17

6.  Marker-less online MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases at a 1.5 T MR-Linac - Feasibility, workflow data and patient acceptance.

Authors:  Cihan Gani; S Boeke; H McNair; J Ehlers; M Nachbar; D Mönnich; A Stolte; J Boldt; C Marks; J Winter; Luise A Künzel; S Gatidis; M Bitzer; D Thorwarth; D Zips
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-30

Review 7.  Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A New Standard of Care?

Authors:  Tobias Forster; Clara Victoria Katharina Köhler; Jürgen Debus; Juliane Hörner-Rieber
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Automatic 3D Monte-Carlo-based secondary dose calculation for online verification of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marcel Nachbar; David Mönnich; Oliver Dohm; Melissa Friedlein; Daniel Zips; Daniela Thorwarth
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-21

Review 9.  Optimizing MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Maureen L Groot Koerkamp; Jeanine E Vasmel; Nicola S Russell; Simona F Shaitelman; Carmel N Anandadas; Adam Currey; Danny Vesprini; Brian M Keller; Chiara De-Colle; Kathy Han; Lior Z Braunstein; Faisal Mahmood; Ebbe L Lorenzen; Marielle E P Philippens; Helena M Verkooijen; Jan J W Lagendijk; Antonetta C Houweling; H J G Desiree van den Bongard; Anna M Kirby
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Image guidance in radiation therapy for better cure of cancer.

Authors:  Vincent Grégoire; Matthias Guckenberger; Karin Haustermans; Jan J W Lagendijk; Cynthia Ménard; Richard Pötter; Ben J Slotman; Kari Tanderup; Daniela Thorwarth; Marcel van Herk; Daniel Zips
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.