| Literature DB >> 31871545 |
Zofia Dąbrowska1, Ewa Dąbrowska2, Barbara Onopiuk3, Paweł Onopiuk4, Karolina Orywal5, Barbara Mroczko5, Małgorzata Pietruska6.
Abstract
Cadmium (Cd) is a strongly toxic heavy metal with prooxidative properties. Since the exposure of the general population to this metal is predicted to increase, effective methods are being sought to prevent its negative actions. One of them involves the use of the antioxidant potential of polyphenol compounds contained in black chokeberry fruit extract and their capability of complex formation with Cd2+. The study objective was to investigate whether the administration of A. melanocarpa fruit extract rich in polyphenol compounds during low and moderate exposures to cadmium can protect the parotid gland against oxidative damage. The study was conducted using the experimental model on female Wistar rats which were given 0.1% aqueous extract of Aronia melanocarpa fruit (AE) and/or cadmium at a concentration of 1 (Cd1) or 5 (Cd5) mg Cd/kg feed for 3 and 10 months, and on control animals. The exposure to Cd attenuated the enzymatic antioxidant barrier (catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx)) and increased the concentration of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), protein carbonyl (PC) groups, and oxidized lipids (LPO) in parotid gland. These disorders led to a reduction in the total antioxidative status (TAS), an increase in the total oxidative state (TOS), and development of stress. The administration of AE at both levels of exposure to cadmium substantially improved the enzymatic antioxidant barrier (CAT, SOD, GPx) and prevented oxidative damage to cellular macromolecules (PC, LPO) and the increase in the level of H2O2, MPO, TOS, and stress indicator (OSI = TOS/TAS) in the parotid gland. Concluding, it should be stated that the consumption of aronia products may prevent oxidative/antioxidative imbalance induced by Cd and oxidative stress development in the parotid gland, thus protecting the gland from damage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31871545 PMCID: PMC6906856 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3403264
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Indicators of the antioxidant status of the parotid gland in rats.
| TAS nmol/mg protein | CAT mmol H2O2/min/mg protein | SOD U/mg protein | GPx mU/mg protein | GSH nmol/mg protein | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | |||||
| Control | 222.4 ± 18.89 | 20.45 ± 2.173 | 0.526 ± 0.048 | 124.2 ± 13.40 | 3.160 ± 0.497 |
| AE | 218.0 ± 13.64 | 19.46 ± 2.063 | 0.480 ± 0.043 | 122.0 ± 11.12 | 5.088 ± 0.920 |
| Cd1 | 208.9 ± 15.36 | 6.980 ± 0.426a,‡,b,‡ | 0.406 ± 0.029 | 75.17 ± 9.086 | 4.226 ± 0.710 |
| Cd1 + AE | 258.2 ± 19.24 | 16.48 ± 1.104c,† | 0.676 ± 0.059c,† | 105.4 ± 8.003 | 4.405 ± 0.516 |
| Cd5 | 254.9 ± 10.77 | 9.790 ± 0.980a,∗,b,∗ | 0.556 ± 0.068 | 88.90 ± 6.468 | 2.858 ± 0.821 |
| Cd5 + AE | 296.4 ± 28.30a,∗,b,∗,c,∗ | 14.05 ± 1.130a,† | 0.602 ± 0.049 | 186.6 ± 9.204c,‡,d,∗,e,‡ | 5.477 ± 0.655 |
|
| |||||
| 10 months | |||||
| Control | 184.8 ± 7.274 | 14.68 ± 1.301 | 0.583 ± 0.070 | 80.96 ± 5.248 | 3.311 ± 0.750 |
| AE | 185.1 ± 26.85 | 14.61 ± 1.415 | 0.512 ± 0.114 | 100.4 ± 15.53 | 2.853 ± 0.648 |
| Cd1 | 124.0 ± 9.215a,∗ | 12.07 ± 0.854 | 0.161 ± 0.020a,‡,b,∗ | 48.20 ± 5.031a,∗ | 2.822 ± 0.400 |
| Cd1 + AE | 200.5 ± 15.38c,∗ | 30.76 ± 3.087a,∗,b,∗,c,‡ | 0.449 ± 0.062c,† | 108.0 ± 11.43c,† | 3.242 ± 0.462 |
| Cd5 | 155.1 ± 7.972 | 11.93 ± 1.087d,‡ | 0.255 ± 0.025a,∗ | 55.32 ± 5.433a,∗,d,∗ | 2.338 ± 0.330 |
| Cd5 + AE | 341.5 ± 18.63a,∗,b,∗,c,‡,e,† | 23.92 ± 2.447a,∗,c,‡,e,∗ | 0.545 ± 0.076c,‡,e,∗ | 157.3 ± 21.90a,∗,b,‡,c,‡,e,‡ | 5.346 ± 1.506b |
Data is mean ± SD for 8 rats. Statistically significant differences (nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test). aCompared to control. bCompared to AE group. cCompared to Cd1 group. dCompared to Cd1+ AE group. eCompared to Cd5 group; ∗p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001, respectively.
Estimation of the main and interactive effects of Cd and AE on the indicators of the antioxidant status of the parotid gland in rats.
| TAS | CAT | SOD | GPx | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main effect of Cd | 3.906a | NS | NS | NS |
| Main effect of AE | 9.741† | 15.12‡ | NS | 23.09‡ |
| Interactive effect of Cd and AE | 10.67† | 18.30‡ | 11.33† | 14.30‡ |
Data present F values and level of statistical significance. †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001, ap = 0.05, NS p > 0.05.
Indicators of the oxidant status of the parotid gland in rats.
| TOS (nmol/mg protein) | OSI (TOS/TAS) | MPO (ng/mg protein) | H2O2 (nmol/mg protein) | LPO (nmol/mg protein) | PC (nmol/mg protein) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 months | ||||||
| Control | 24.66 ± 3.716 | 0.112 ± 0.016 | 6.184 ± 0.500 | 6.743 ± 0.765 | 1.862 ± 0.167 | 26.98 ± 2.99 |
| AE | 22.11 ± 2.446 | 0.104 ± 0.014 | 4.915 ± 0.447 | 6.416 ± 0.614 | 1.916 ± 0.204 | 19.98 ± 1.455 |
| Cd1 | 29.98 ± 4.387 | 0.145 ± 0.021 | 7.317 ± 0.665 | 9.204 ± 0.642a,∗ | 2.235 ± 0.270 | 40.85 ± 2.279a,∗,b,† |
| Cd1 + AE | 12.22 ± 1.642c,∗ | 0.051 ± 0.009c,† | 5.136 ± 0.515 | 6.371 ± 0.666c,∗ | 1.771 ± 0.144 | 20.83 ± 2.357c,∗ |
| Cd5 | 44.16 ± 8.377a,∗,b,∗,d,† | 0.173 ± 0.032d,† | 7.444 ± 0.476 | 8.835 ± 0.304a,∗ | 3.927 ± 0.915a,∗,b,∗,d,∗ | 45.40 ± 6.907a,∗,b,‡,d,† |
| Cd5 + AE | 18.18 ± 4.155e,† | 0.064 ± 0.016c,∗,e,∗ | 5.803 ± 0.482 | 7.446 ± 0.473 | 2.098 ± 0.208e,∗ | 28.93 ± 1.719 |
|
| ||||||
| 10 months | ||||||
| Control | 24.63 ± 8.303 | 0.132 ± 0.040 | 5.828 ± 0.586 | 6.427 ± 0.332 | 1.800 ± 0.306 | 19.60 ± 1.660 |
| AE | 20.03 ± 3.535 | 0.122 ± 0.025 | 3.898 ± 0.372 | 5.946 ± 0.481 | 1.772 ± 0.253 | 19.38 ± 3.165 |
| Cd1 | 48.37 ± 8.682a,∗,b,∗ | 0.419 ± 0.095a,∗,b,∗ | 7.045 ± 0.668 | 7.334 ± 0.557 | 2.153 ± 0.217 | 38.57 ± 6.440a,∗ |
| Cd1 + AE | 36.13 ± 6.036 | 0.188 ± 0.032c,∗ | 3.840 ± 0.265c,∗ | 7.232 ± 0.475 | 1.664 ± 0.125 | 19.68 ± 3.169c,∗ |
| Cd5 | 69.46 ± 10.11a,†,b,‡ | 0.464 ± 0.077a,†,b,∗ | 9.192 ± 1.407 | 10.52 ± 1.446a,∗,b,† | 2.942 ± 0.285a,∗,d,∗ | 45.05 ± 6.289a,†,b,†,d,† |
| Cd5 + AE | 42.29 ± 3.989b,†,e,∗ | 0.125 ± 0.011e,∗ | 6.496 ± 0.494 | 8.837 ± 0.678b,† | 2.144 ± 0.190 | 34.08 ± 4.822e,∗ |
Data is mean ± SD for 8 rats. Statistically significant differences (nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test). aCompared to control. bCompared to AE group. cCompared to Cd1 group. dCompared to Cd1+ AE group. eCompared to Cd5 group; ∗p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001, respectively.
Estimation of the main and interactive effects of Cd and AE on the indicators of the oxidation state of the parotid gland in rats.
| TOS | OSI | MPO | H2O2 | LPO | PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Main effect of Cd | 11.85‡ | 7.539† | 10.51† | 17.16‡ | 5.793∗ | 26.77‡ |
| Main effect of AE | 8.091† | 10.46† | 24.19‡ | 4.700∗ | 4.017∗ | 19.95‡ |
| Interactive effect of Cd and AE | 4.043† | 8.656† | NS | NS | 4.260∗ | 7.002† |
Data present F values and the level of statistical significance. ∗p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001, NS p > 0.05.
The levels of cadmium in the parotid gland.
| 3-month exposure | 10-month exposure | |
|---|---|---|
| Cd | ||
| Control | 0.0344 ± 0.0099 | 0.0950 ± 0.0024 |
| AE | 0.0075 ± 0.0007 | 0.0939 ± 0.0020 |
| Cd1 | 0.4053 ± 0.0294a,∗,b,∗ | 0.7328 ± 0.0417a,∗,b,∗ |
| Cd1 + AE | 0.2442 ± 0.0300a,∗,c,∗ | 0.5876 ± 0.0318a∗c∗ |
| Cd5 | 1.4871 ± 0.0294a,‡,b,‡,d,∗ | 2.0430 ± 0.0913a,‡,b,‡,d,∗ |
| Cd5 + AE | 1.0370 ± 0.0982a,†,b,‡,e,∗ | 1.7370 ± 0.0578a,‡,b,‡,e,∗ |
Data is mean ± SD for 8 rats. Statistically significant differences (nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test). aCompared to control. bCompared to AE group. cCompared to Cd1 group. dCompared to Cd1+ AE group. eCompared to Cd5 group; ∗p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001, respectively.
Estimation of the main and interactive effects of Cd and AE on the parotid gland.
| Main effect of Cd | Main effect of AE | Interactive effect of Cd and AE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cd |
|
|
|
Data present F values and level of statistical significance. ‡p < 0.001, NS p > 0.05.
Analysis of the correlation between the study parameters of the oxidoreductive status of the parotid gland and cadmium concentration.
| Cd | TOS | TAS | OSI | CAT | SOD | GPx | GSH | MPO | PC | H2O2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOS | 0.482‡ | ||||||||||
| TAS | NS | NS | |||||||||
| OSI | 0.356‡ | 0.908‡ | -0.496‡ | ||||||||
| CAT | NS | NS | 0.290‡ | -0.212∗ | |||||||
| SOD | -0.216∗ | -0.395‡ | 0.614‡ | -0.585‡ | 0.277† | ||||||
| GPx | NS | -0.215∗ | 0.610‡ | -0.418‡ | 0.467‡ | 0.499‡ | |||||
| GSH | NS | NS | 0.346‡ | NS | 0.210∗ | 0.204∗ | 0.392‡ | ||||
| MPO | 0.371‡ | 0.348‡ | NS | 0.250∗ | -0.378‡ | NS | -0.263† | NS | |||
| PC | 0.575‡ | 0.445‡ | NS | 0.305† | -0.285† | NS | NS | NS | 0.504‡ | ||
| H2O2 | 0.534‡ | 0.396‡ | 0.273† | 0.259∗ | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.325† | 0.766‡ | |
| LPO | 0.390‡ | 0.356‡ | 0.249∗ | 0.214∗ | NS | NS | NS | NS | 0.349‡ | 0.742‡ | 0.665‡ |
∗ p < 0.05, †p < 0.01, ‡p < 0.001, NS p > 0.05.