Literature DB >> 31871110

Self-efficacy and Physical Activity in Overweight and Obese Adults Participating in a Worksite Weight Loss Intervention: Multistate Modeling of Wearable Device Data.

Michael C Robertson1,2, Charles E Green3, Yue Liao1, Casey P Durand2, Karen M Basen-Engquist4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is associated with a reduced risk of numerous types of cancer and plays an important role in maintaining a healthy weight. Wearable physical activity trackers may supplement behavioral intervention and enable researchers to study how determinants like self-efficacy predict physical activity patterns over time.
METHODS: We used multistate models to evaluate how self-efficacy predicted physical activity states among overweight and obese individuals participating in a 26-week weight loss program (N = 96). We specified five states to capture physical activity patterns: (i) active (i.e., meeting recommendations for 2 weeks), (ii) insufficiently active, (iii) nonvalid wear, (iv) favorable transition (i.e., improvement in physical activity over 2 weeks), and (v) unfavorable transition. We calculated HRs of transition probabilities by self-efficacy, body mass index, age, and time.
RESULTS: The average prevalence of individuals in the active, insufficiently active, and nonvalid wear states was 13%, 44%, and 16%, respectively. Low self-efficacy negatively predicted entering an active state [HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.29-0.88]. Obesity negatively predicted making a favorable transition out of an insufficiently active state (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40-0.91). Older participants were less likely to transition to the nonvalid wear state (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.93). Device nonwear increased in the second half of the intervention (HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.07-2.81).
CONCLUSIONS: Self-efficacy is an important predictor for clinically relevant physical activity change in overweight and obese individuals. Multistate modeling is useful for analyzing longitudinal physical activity data. IMPACT: Multistate modeling can be used for statistical inference of covariates and allow for explicit modeling of nonvalid wear.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Modernizing Population Science." ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31871110      PMCID: PMC7125025          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  43 in total

Review 1.  Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity.

Authors:  E McAuley; B Blissmer
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Social-cognitive theory predictors of exercise behavior in endometrial cancer survivors.

Authors:  Karen Basen-Engquist; Cindy L Carmack; Yisheng Li; Jubilee Brown; Anuja Jhingran; Daniel C Hughes; Heidi Y Perkins; Stacie Scruggs; Carol Harrison; George Baum; Diane C Bodurka; Andrew Waters
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Exercise self-efficacy intervention in overweight and obese women.

Authors:  Jude Buckley
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2014-08-21

Review 4.  Ecological Momentary Assessment in Physical Activity Research.

Authors:  Genevieve Fridlund Dunton
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 6.230

5.  Effects of a 12-month physical activity intervention on prevalence of metabolic syndrome in elderly men and women.

Authors:  Xuewen Wang; Fang-Chi Hsu; Scott Isom; Michael P Walkup; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Bret H Goodpaster; Timothy S Church; Marco Pahor; Randall S Stafford; Barbara J Nicklas
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Enhancing physical activity promotion in midlife women with technology-based self-monitoring and social connectivity: A pilot study.

Authors:  Meghan L Butryn; Danielle Arigo; Greer A Raggio; Marie Colasanti; Evan M Forman
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2014-12-08

7.  Acceptability and utility of, and preference for wearable activity trackers amongst non-metropolitan cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sarah J Hardcastle; Maddison Galliott; Brigid M Lynch; Nga H Nguyen; Paul A Cohen; Ganendra Raj Mohan; Niloufer J Johansen; Christobel Saunders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A multi-state model to estimate incidence of heroin use.

Authors:  Albert Sánchez-Niubò; Odd O Aalen; Antònia Domingo-Salvany; Ellen J Amundsen; Josep Fortiana; Kjetil Røysland
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.

Authors:  Kathryn Mercer; Lora Giangregorio; Eric Schneider; Parmit Chilana; Melissa Li; Kelly Grindrod
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.773

10.  Validity of Fitbit's active minutes as compared with a research-grade accelerometer and self-reported measures.

Authors:  Wayne Brewer; Brian T Swanson; Alexis Ortiz
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2017-09-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Using wearable biological sensors to provide personalized feedback to motivate behavioral changes: Study protocol for a randomized controlled physical activity intervention in cancer survivors (Project KNOWN).

Authors:  Yue Liao; Susan M Schembre; Grace E Brannon; Zui Pan; Jing Wang; Sadia Ali; M Shaalan Beg; Karen M Basen-Engquist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.