Literature DB >> 31871087

β-Lactamase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Shows Dynamics in the Active Site That Increase upon Inhibitor Binding.

Wouter Elings1, Anamika Gaur1, Anneloes J Blok1, Monika Timmer1, Hugo van Ingen1, Marcellus Ubbink2.   

Abstract

The Mycobacterium tuberculosis β-lactamase BlaC is a broad-spectrum β-lactamase that can convert a range of β-lactam antibiotics. Enzymes with low specificity are expected to exhibit active-site flexibility. To probe the motions in BlaC, we studied the dynamic behavior in solution using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. 15N relaxation experiments show that BlaC is mostly rigid on the pico- to nanosecond timescale. Saturation transfer experiments indicate that also on the high-millisecond timescale BlaC is not dynamic. Using relaxation dispersion experiments, clear evidence was obtained for dynamics in the low-millisecond range, with an exchange rate of ca. 860 s-1 The dynamic amide groups are localized in the active site. Upon formation of an adduct with the inhibitor avibactam, extensive line broadening occurs, indicating an increase in magnitude of the active-site dynamics. Furthermore, the rate of the motions increases significantly. Upon reaction with the inhibitor clavulanic acid, similar line broadening is accompanied by duplication of NMR signals, indicative of at least one additional, slower exchange process (exchange rate, k ex, of <100 s-1), while for this inhibitor also loss of pico- to nanosecond timescale rigidity is observed for some amides in the α domain. Possible sources of the observed dynamics, such as motions in the omega loop and rearrangements of active-site residues, are discussed. The increase in dynamics upon ligand binding argues against a model of inhibitor binding through conformational selection. Rather, the induced dynamics may serve to maximize the likelihood of sampling the optimal conformation for hydrolysis of the bound ligand.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BlaC; NMR spectroscopy; avibactam; beta-lactamases; chemical exchange; clavulanic acid; inhibition; structural biology

Year:  2020        PMID: 31871087      PMCID: PMC7038250          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.02025-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  58 in total

1.  HYDRONMR: prediction of NMR relaxation of globular proteins from atomic-level structures and hydrodynamic calculations.

Authors:  J García de la Torre; M L Huertas; B Carrasco
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 2.  Dynamic activation of protein function: a view emerging from NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  A J Wand
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-11

3.  A standard numbering scheme for the class A beta-lactamases.

Authors:  R P Ambler; A F Coulson; J M Frère; J M Ghuysen; B Joris; M Forsman; R C Levesque; G Tiraby; S G Waley
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  NMR investigation of Tyr105 mutants in TEM-1 beta-lactamase: dynamics are correlated with function.

Authors:  Nicolas Doucet; Pierre-Yves Savard; Joelle N Pelletier; Stéphane M Gagné
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Evolution of conformational dynamics determines the conversion of a promiscuous generalist into a specialist enzyme.

Authors:  Taisong Zou; Valeria A Risso; Jose A Gavira; Jose M Sanchez-Ruiz; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Hyperstability and substrate promiscuity in laboratory resurrections of Precambrian β-lactamases.

Authors:  Valeria A Risso; Jose A Gavira; Diego F Mejia-Carmona; Eric A Gaucher; Jose M Sanchez-Ruiz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Probing chemical shifts of invisible states of proteins with relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopy: how well can we do?

Authors:  D Flemming Hansen; Pramodh Vallurupalli; Patrik Lundström; Philipp Neudecker; Lewis E Kay
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Ligand-Induced Proton Transfer and Low-Barrier Hydrogen Bond Revealed by X-ray Crystallography.

Authors:  Derek A Nichols; Jacqueline C Hargis; Ruslan Sanishvili; Priyadarshini Jaishankar; Kyle Defrees; Emmanuel W Smith; Kenneth K Wang; Fabio Prati; Adam R Renslo; H Lee Woodcock; Yu Chen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  New β-lactamase inhibitors: a therapeutic renaissance in an MDR world.

Authors:  Sarah M Drawz; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  A gratuitous β-Lactamase inducer uncovers hidden active site dynamics of the Staphylococcus aureus BlaR1 sensor domain.

Authors:  Thomas E Frederick; Jeffrey W Peng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Two β-Lactamase Variants with Reduced Clavulanic Acid Inhibition Display Different Millisecond Dynamics.

Authors:  Wouter Elings; Aleksandra Chikunova; Danny B van Zanten; Ralphe Drenth; Misbha Ud Din Ahmad; Anneloes J Blok; Monika Timmer; Anastassis Perrakis; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Toho-1 β-lactamase: backbone chemical shift assignments and changes in dynamics upon binding with avibactam.

Authors:  Varun V Sakhrani; Rittik K Ghosh; Eduardo Hilario; Kevin L Weiss; Leighton Coates; Leonard J Mueller
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 3.  Mechanisms of ligand binding.

Authors:  Enrico Di Cera
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2020-12

4.  Slow Protein Dynamics Elicits New Enzymatic Functions by Means of Epistatic Interactions.

Authors:  Maria-Agustina Rossi; Timothy Palzkill; Fabio C L Almeida; Alejandro J Vila
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 8.800

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.