Literature DB >> 31871048

Development and validation of a machine learning, smartphone-based tonometer.

Aaron Y Lee1, Joanne C Wen2, Yue Wu3, Ian Luttrell3, Shu Feng1, Philip P Chen1, Ted Spaide1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using a prototype smartphone tonometer with other tonometers used in clinical practice.
METHODS: Patients from an academic glaucoma practice were recruited. The smartphone tonometer uses fixed force applanation and in conjunction with a machine-learning computer algorithm is able to calculate the IOP. IOP was also measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in all subjects. A subset of patients were also measured using ICare, pneumotonometry (upright and supine positions) and Tono-Pen (upright and supine positions) and the results were compared.
RESULTS: 92 eyes of 81 subjects were successfully measured. The mean difference (in mm Hg) for IOP measurements of the smartphone tonometer versus other devices was +0.24 mm Hg for GAT, -1.39 mm Hg for ICare, -3.71 mm Hg for pneumotonometry and -1.30 mm Hg for Tono-Pen. The 95% limits of agreement for the smartphone tonometer versus other devices was -4.35 to 4.83 mm Hg for GAT, -6.48 to 3.70 mm Hg for ICare, -7.66 to -0.15 mm Hg for pneumotonometry and -5.72 to 3.12 mm Hg for Tono-Pen. Overall, the smartphone tonometer results correlated best with GAT (R2=0.67, p<0.001). Of the 92 videos, 90 (97.8%) were within ±5 mm Hg of GAT and 58 (63.0%) were within ±2 mm Hg of GAT.
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary IOP measurements using a prototype smartphone-based tonometer was grossly equivalent to the reference standard. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intraocular pressure

Year:  2019        PMID: 31871048      PMCID: PMC7397723          DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  19 in total

1.  The number of ophthalmologists in practice and training worldwide: a growing gap despite more than 200,000 practitioners.

Authors:  Serge Resnikoff; William Felch; Tina-Marie Gauthier; Bruce Spivey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Postural change in intraocular pressure: a comparison of measurement with a Goldmann tonometer, Tonopen XL, pneumatonometer, and HA-2.

Authors:  Yaniv Barkana
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Measurement of the difference in intraocular pressure between the sitting and lying body positions in healthy subjects: direct comparison of the Icare Pro with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Pneumatonometer and Tonopen XL.

Authors:  Yaniv Barkana; Shay Gutfreund
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Clinical evaluation of the Halberg hand applanation tonometer.

Authors:  C A Wind; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1972-08

5.  Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy for grading diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Andrea Russo; Francesco Morescalchi; Ciro Costagliola; Luisa Delcassi; Francesco Semeraro
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Postural change of IOP in normal persons and in patients with primary wide open-angle glaucoma and low-tension glaucoma.

Authors:  S Tsukahara; T Sasaki
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Comparison of Smartphone Ophthalmoscopy With Slit-Lamp Biomicroscopy for Grading Vertical Cup-to-Disc Ratio.

Authors:  Andrea Russo; William Mapham; Raffaele Turano; Ciro Costagliola; Francesco Morescalchi; Nicolò Scaroni; Francesco Semeraro
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry.

Authors:  Jonathan Alistair Cook; Adriana Paola Botello; Andrew Elders; Alia Fathi Ali; Augusto Azuara-Blanco; Cynthia Fraser; Kirsty McCormack; Jennifer Margaret Burr
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Agreement between retinal images obtained via smartphones and images obtained with retinal cameras or fundoscopic exams - systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Manuel Ap Vilela; Felipe M Valença; Pedro Km Barreto; Carlos Ev Amaral; Lúcia C Pellanda
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-11

10.  Smartphone guided wide-field imaging for retinopathy of prematurity in neonatal intensive care unit - a Smart ROP (SROP) initiative.

Authors:  Anubhav Goyal; Mahesh Gopalakrishnan; Giridhar Anantharaman; Dhileesh P Chandrashekharan; Thomas Thachil; Ashish Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  4 in total

1.  Home perimetry. Is possible?

Authors:  F J Muñoz-Negrete; J Moreno-Montañés; G Rebolleda
Journal:  Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-05-15

2.  Using Deep Learning to Automate Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Readings.

Authors:  Ted Spaide; Yue Wu; Ryan T Yanagihara; Shu Feng; Omar Ghabra; Jonathan S Yi; Philip P Chen; Francy Moses; Aaron Y Lee; Joanne C Wen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Chronic Kidney Disease as a Cardiovascular Disorder-Tonometry Data Analyses.

Authors:  Mateusz Twardawa; Piotr Formanowicz; Dorota Formanowicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Model-to-Data Approach for Deep Learning in Optical Coherence Tomography Intraretinal Fluid Segmentation.

Authors:  Nihaal Mehta; Cecilia S Lee; Luísa S M Mendonça; Khadija Raza; Phillip X Braun; Jay S Duker; Nadia K Waheed; Aaron Y Lee
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 8.253

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.