Danielle D Weinberg1, Haley Newman2, Claire E Fishman3, Trixie A Katz4, Vinay Nadkarni5, Heidi M Herrick1, Elizabeth E Foglia6. 1. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. 2. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. 3. The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. 4. Neonatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergerdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 3501 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. 6. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States; The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States. Electronic address: foglia@email.chop.edu.
Abstract
AIM: To assess visual attention of neonatal team leaders during delivery room resuscitation of preterm infants using eye tracking glasses. METHODS: Prospective observational eye tracking study. Gaze fixations and sequences were captured, categorized, and mapped during the first 5 min of the resuscitations. Gaze fixation metrics of total gaze duration, visit count, and visit duration were summarized and compared based on interventions performed and provider training level. Fixation sequences were compared between attending neonatologists and fellows. RESULTS: During 18 eye tracking recordings, practitioners focused most of their cumulative visual attention on the infant (median total gaze duration 57%, interquartile range [IQR] 38-61%), followed by monitors (24%, IQR 13-46%), clinical staff (5%, IQR 1-8%), other physical objects (4%, IQR 3-6%), T-piece resuscitator (2%, IQR 0-4%) and the Apgar timer (1%, IQR 0-2%). Visual attention parameters varied according to intervention, with higher visit counts on the infant during corrective ventilation steps than during Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) or Positive Pressure Ventilation (PPV), and longer visit durations on monitors during PPV. Time and frequency-based measures of visual attention did not significantly differ by provider training level, but patterned fixation sequences were identified among attending neonatologists that were not observed in fellows. CONCLUSION: Team leaders predominantly gazed upon the infant and monitors during resuscitation, and visual attention parameters varied depending on the respiratory interventions performed. Attending neonatologists exhibited patterned fixation sequences that were not observed in fellows. Study results may have implications for optimizing delivery room design and training novice providers.
AIM: To assess visual attention of neonatal team leaders during delivery room resuscitation of preterm infants using eye tracking glasses. METHODS: Prospective observational eye tracking study. Gaze fixations and sequences were captured, categorized, and mapped during the first 5 min of the resuscitations. Gaze fixation metrics of total gaze duration, visit count, and visit duration were summarized and compared based on interventions performed and provider training level. Fixation sequences were compared between attending neonatologists and fellows. RESULTS: During 18 eye tracking recordings, practitioners focused most of their cumulative visual attention on the infant (median total gaze duration 57%, interquartile range [IQR] 38-61%), followed by monitors (24%, IQR 13-46%), clinical staff (5%, IQR 1-8%), other physical objects (4%, IQR 3-6%), T-piece resuscitator (2%, IQR 0-4%) and the Apgar timer (1%, IQR 0-2%). Visual attention parameters varied according to intervention, with higher visit counts on the infant during corrective ventilation steps than during Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) or Positive Pressure Ventilation (PPV), and longer visit durations on monitors during PPV. Time and frequency-based measures of visual attention did not significantly differ by provider training level, but patterned fixation sequences were identified among attending neonatologists that were not observed in fellows. CONCLUSION: Team leaders predominantly gazed upon the infant and monitors during resuscitation, and visual attention parameters varied depending on the respiratory interventions performed. Attending neonatologists exhibited patterned fixation sequences that were not observed in fellows. Study results may have implications for optimizing delivery room design and training novice providers.
Authors: Taylor Sawyer; Agnes Sierocka-Castaneda; Debora Chan; Benjamin Berg; Mike Lustik; Mark Thompson Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Izhak Nadler; Penelope M Sanderson; Coleen R Van Dyken; Peter G Davis; Helen G Liley Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-01-06 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: C M Schulz; E Schneider; L Fritz; J Vockeroth; A Hapfelmeier; T Brandt; E F Kochs; G Schneider Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2011-04-07 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Brenda Hiu Yan Law; Po-Yin Cheung; Michael Wagner; Sylvia van Os; Bin Zheng; Georg Schmölzer Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2017-08-19 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Ben McNaughten; Caroline Hart; Stephen Gallagher; Carol Junk; Patricia Coulter; Andrew Thompson; Thomas Bourke Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2018-03-07 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Trixie A Katz; Danielle D Weinberg; Claire E Fishman; Vinay Nadkarni; Patrice Tremoulet; Arjan B Te Pas; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Elizabeth E Foglia Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Mark Browning; Simon Cooper; Robyn Cant; Louise Sparkes; Fiona Bogossian; Brett Williams; Peter O'Meara; Linda Ross; Graham Munro; Barbara Black Journal: Int Emerg Nurs Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 2.142
Authors: Matthew R White; Heather Braund; Daniel Howes; Rylan Egan; Andreas Gegenfurtner; Jeroen J G van Merrienboer; Adam Szulewski Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Heidi Herrick; Danielle Weinberg; Charlotte Cecarelli; Claire E Fishman; Haley Newman; Maria C den Boer; Tessa Martherus; Trixie A Katz; Vinay Nadkarni; Arjan B Te Pas; Elizabeth E Foglia Journal: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 5.747
Authors: Natalie Batey; Caroline Henry; Shalabh Garg; Michael Wagner; Atul Malhotra; Michel Valstar; Thomas Smith; Don Sharkey Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Peter Gröpel; Michael Wagner; Katharina Bibl; Hannah Schwarz; Felix Eibensteiner; Angelika Berger; Francesco S Cardona Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 3.569