Literature DB >> 35241791

The newborn delivery room of tomorrow: emerging and future technologies.

Natalie Batey1, Caroline Henry1,2, Shalabh Garg3, Michael Wagner4, Atul Malhotra5, Michel Valstar6, Thomas Smith6, Don Sharkey7,8.   

Abstract

Advances in neonatal care have resulted in improved outcomes for high-risk newborns with technologies playing a significant part although many were developed for the neonatal intensive care unit. The care provided in the delivery room (DR) during the first few minutes of life can impact short- and long-term neonatal outcomes. Increasingly, technologies have a critical role to play in the DR particularly with monitoring and information provision. However, the DR is a unique environment and has major challenges around the period of foetal to neonatal transition that need to be overcome when developing new technologies. This review focuses on current DR technologies as well as those just emerging and further over the horizon. We identify what key opinion leaders in DR care think of current technologies, what the important DR measures are to them, and which technologies might be useful in the future. We link these with key technologies including respiratory function monitors, electoral impedance tomography, videolaryngoscopy, augmented reality, video recording, eye tracking, artificial intelligence, and contactless monitoring. Encouraging funders and industry to address the unique technological challenges of newborn care in the DR will allow the continued improvement of outcomes of high-risk infants from the moment of birth. IMPACT: Technological advances for newborn delivery room care require consideration of the unique environment, the variable patient characteristics, and disease states, as well as human factor challenges. Neonatology as a speciality has embraced technology, allowing its rapid progression and improved outcomes for infants, although innovation in the delivery room often lags behind that in the intensive care unit. Investing in new and emerging technologies can support healthcare providers when optimising care and could improve training, safety, and neonatal outcomes.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35241791     DOI: 10.1038/s41390-022-01988-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Res        ISSN: 0031-3998            Impact factor:   3.756


  92 in total

1.  A comparison of the mouth-to-mouth and mouth-to-airway methods of artificial respiration with the chest-pressure arm-lift methods.

Authors:  P SAFAR; L A ESCARRAGA; J O ELAM
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1958-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jonathan Wyllie; Jeffrey M Perlman; John Kattwinkel; Myra H Wyckoff; Khalid Aziz; Ruth Guinsburg; Han-Suk Kim; Helen G Liley; Lindsay Mildenhall; Wendy M Simon; Edgardo Szyld; Masanori Tamura; Sithembiso Velaphi
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Continuous pO2 monitoring in the neonate by skin electrodes.

Authors:  P Eberhard; W Mindt; F Jann; K Hammacher
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1975-05

Review 4.  A critical review of the 2020 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation treatment recommendations for resuscitating the newly born infant.

Authors:  Ola D Saugstad; Nicola J Robertson; Maximo Vento
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.299

Review 5.  Resuscitation of the asphyxiated infant.

Authors:  K W Cross
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 6.  The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation-Review of the last 25 years and vision for the future.

Authors:  Gavin D Perkins; Robert Neumar; Koenraad G Monsieurs; Swee Han Lim; Maaret Castren; Jerry P Nolan; Vinay Nadkarni; Bill Montgomery; Petter Steen; Richard Cummins; Douglas Chamberlain; Richard Aickin; Allan de Caen; Tzong-Luen Wang; David Stanton; Raffo Escalante; Clifton W Callaway; Jasmeet Soar; Theresa Olasveengen; Ian Maconochie; Myra Wyckoff; Robert Greif; Eunice M Singletary; Robert O'Connor; Taku Iwami; Laurie Morrison; Peter Morley; Eddy Lang; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Umbilical Cord Management at Term and Late Preterm Birth: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Judith Gomersall; Slavica Berber; Philippa Middleton; Susan J McDonald; Susan Niermeyer; Walid El-Naggar; Peter G Davis; Georg M Schmölzer; Colleen Ovelman; Roger F Soll
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Admission temperature of low birth weight infants: predictors and associated morbidities.

Authors:  Abbot R Laptook; Walid Salhab; Brinda Bhaskar
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Umbilical Cord Management for Newborns <34 Weeks' Gestation: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anna Lene Seidler; Gillian M L Gyte; Heike Rabe; José L Díaz-Rossello; Lelia Duley; Khalid Aziz; Daniela Testoni Costa-Nobre; Peter G Davis; Georg M Schmölzer; Colleen Ovelman; Lisa M Askie; Roger Soll
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Delivery Room Interventions for Hypothermia in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thangaraj Abiramalatha; Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy; Tapas Bandyopadhyay; Abdul Kareem Pullattayil; Sivam Thanigainathan; Daniele Trevisanuto; Charles C Roehr
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 26.796

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Replaces Bedside Imaging in Diagnosing Pneumonia in Infants.

Authors:  Haijun Zhang; Yingcui Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.246

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.