Literature DB >> 31869615

Hazard evaluation of polystyrene nanoplastic with nine bioassays did not show particle-specific acute toxicity.

Margit Heinlaan1, Kaja Kasemets2, Villem Aruoja2, Irina Blinova2, Olesja Bondarenko2, Aljona Lukjanova2, Alla Khosrovyan2, Imbi Kurvet2, Mirjam Pullerits2, Mariliis Sihtmäe2, Grigory Vasiliev3, Heiki Vija2, Anne Kahru4.   

Abstract

Plastic is a wide-spread pollutant and must be evaluated for potential adverse effects of its breakdown product, microplastic (≤5 mm) along with its subfraction, nanoplastic (1-100 nm). Risk assessment of pollutants cannot be conducted without their toxicity (dose-response) data. In this study, toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-NPL) was evaluated using 8 acute and 1 subchronic toxicity assays with 10 organisms of different biological complexity (bacteria, yeast, algae, protozoans, mammalian cells in vitro, crustaceans, midge larvae). Commercial 26 and 100 nm carboxylated PS-NPL spheres were chosen as model and tested in nominal concentrations up to 100 mg/L (1.025·1016 26 nm and 1.83·1014 100 nm particles/L). In most of the assays, both PS-NPL proved non-toxic (L(E)C50 > 100 mg/L) but three tests (V. fischeri, R. subcapitata, D. magna) flagged toxicity in 'as received' 26 nm PS-NPL and D. magna also in 100 nm PS-NPL (EC50 ranging from 13 to 71 mg/L). As, according to manufacturers, both PS-NPL suspensions contained additives (surfactants and biocidal NaN3), the three toxicity tests were repeated also on dialysed PS-NPL and on NaN3. Non-toxicity of dialysed PS-NPL indicated that the toxicity of 'as-received' PS-NPL was not particle-specific but false positive due to water-soluble additives in the PS-NPL preparations. NaN3 was very toxic to D. magna (48 h EC50 = 0.05 ± 0.03 mg NaN3/L), toxic to R. subcapitata (72 h EC50 = 4.97 ± 3.7 mg NaN3/L) and non-toxic to V. fischeri. Toxicity of 'as-received' PS-NPL was not fully explainable by NaN3 but also attributable to other additives in the suspensions. Toxicity research of microplastic using commercial model particles must always consider the potential influence of additives, e.g. test the toxicity of dialysed NPL for comparison. In our study, D. magna, R. subcapitata and V. fischeri were the most sensitive to PS-NPL water-soluble additives and flagged their presence in NPL preparations.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ISO21338:2010; Microplastic; NaN(3) OECD201; OECD202; Toxicity artefacts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31869615     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  14 in total

Review 1.  Materials, surfaces, and interfacial phenomena in nanoplastics toxicology research.

Authors:  Leisha M A Martin; Nin Gan; Erica Wang; Mackenzie Merrill; Wei Xu
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 8.071

2.  Virgin and UV-weathered polyamide microplastics posed no effect on the survival and reproduction of Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Alla Khosrovyan; Anne Kahru
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Acute toxicity assessment of polyaniline/Ag nanoparticles/graphene oxide quantum dots on Cypridopsis vidua and Artemia salina.

Authors:  Azza Shokry; Marwa Khalil; Hesham Ibrahim; Moataz Soliman; Shaker Ebrahim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Submicron polymer particles may mask the presence of toxicants in wastewater effluents probed by reporter gene containing bacteria.

Authors:  Bhuvaneshwari Manivannan; Evgeni Eltzov; Mikhail Borisover
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Micro-Nano Plastic in the Aquatic Environment: Methodological Problems and Challenges.

Authors:  Saif Uddin; Scott W Fowler; Nazima Habibi; Montaha Behbehani
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Development of Microfluidic, Serum-Free Bronchial Epithelial Cells-on-a-Chip to Facilitate a More Realistic In vitro Testing of Nanoplastics.

Authors:  Govind Gupta; Srikanth Vallabani; Romain Bordes; Kunal Bhattacharya; Bengt Fadeel
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-06

7.  Size fractionation of high-density polyethylene breakdown nanoplastics reveals different toxic response in Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Mikael T Ekvall; Isabella Gimskog; Jing Hua; Egle Kelpsiene; Martin Lundqvist; Tommy Cedervall
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Micro and Nanoplastics Identification: Classic Methods and Innovative Detection Techniques.

Authors:  Stefania Mariano; Stefano Tacconi; Marco Fidaleo; Marco Rossi; Luciana Dini
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-26

9.  A Meta-analysis of Ecotoxicological Hazard Data for Nanoplastics in Marine and Freshwater Systems.

Authors:  Tong Yang; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Metal-doping of nanoplastics enables accurate assessment of uptake and effects on Gammarus pulex.

Authors:  P E Redondo-Hasselerharm; G Vink; D M Mitrano; A A Koelmans
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.