| Literature DB >> 31867542 |
Nina V Vlasenko1, Pavlo I Kyriienko1, Karina V Valihura1, Gulnara R Kosmambetova1, Sergii O Soloviev1, Peter E Strizhak1.
Abstract
It has been shown that yttria-stabilized zirconia is an effective catalyst for ethanol to n-butanol Guerbet coupling. The variation of the calcination temperature allows an improvement in the catalytic characteristics of this material via stabilization of the tetragonal phase of zirconia, having higher basicity than the monoclinic one. The treatment of yttria-stabilized zirconia at an optimal calcination temperature of 500 °C induces the increase in surface basicity required for the aldol condensation step, along with a decrease in surface acidity, which is responsible for the side reaction such as ethylene formation. The catalyst obtained significantly exceeds in selectivity and n-butanol yield than individual zirconia and other oxide systems which have been studied in this reaction.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31867542 PMCID: PMC6921634 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1XRD patterns for YSZ compositions.
Figure 2Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for YSZ compositions.
Figure 3Pore size distribution for YSZ compositions.
Structural Characteristics and Phase Composition of YSZ Samplesa
| sample | phase composition | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YSZ 300 | 209 | 5.4 | 0.43 | A |
| YSZ 400 | 160 | 5.6 | 0.38 | T |
| YSZ 500 | 93 | 7.6 | 0.29 | T |
| YSZ 700 | 43 | 18.2 | 0.28 | T |
| YSZ 900 | 21 | 15.2 | 0.24 | T + M |
A—amorphous; T—tetragonal; M—monoclinic phase of zirconia.
Figure 4FTIR spectra of YSZ powders calcined at different temperatures.
Figure 5Differential QETD curves of ammonia (a) and carbon dioxide (b) for YSZ compositions.
Temperatures of Desorption Peaks (Tdesmax) and Total Desorption (Tdestotal) of Probe Substances for YSZ
| sample | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YSZ 300 | <50 | 115 | 170 | 180 | 50 | 105 | 155 | 195 | 225 | |||
| YSZ 400 | <50 | 110 | 160 | 170 | <50 | 125 | 180 | 200 | ||||
| YSZ 500 | <50 | 85 | 130 | 150 | <50 | 110 | 190 | 280 | 325 | |||
| YSZ 700 | 160 | 230 | 250 | 85 | 140 | 225 | 250 | |||||
| YSZ 900 | 85 | 135 | 185 | 200 | 60 | 115 | 150 | |||||
Acid–Base Characteristics of YSZ Compositions
| acidity | basicity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sample | acid capacity mmol NH3/g | acid density ×103, mmol NH3/m2 | base capacity mmol CO2/g | base density ×103, mmol CO2/m2 |
| YSZ 300 | 0.46 | 2.20 | 0.41 | 1.93 |
| YSZ 400 | 0.42 | 2.64 | 0.23 | 1.46 |
| YSZ 500 | 0.27 | 2.89 | 0.42 | 4.49 |
| YSZ 700 | 0.14 | 3.29 | 0.12 | 2.72 |
| YSZ 900 | 0.07 | 3.43 | 0.08 | 4.00 |
Figure 6Effect of the calcination temperature on the limit strength of acid and base sites of the YSZ compositions.
Catalytic Characteristics of YSZ Compositions in the Guerbet Processa
| selectivity, % | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| catalyst | conversion, % | E | BD | DEE | C3+ | AA | Ac | EA | CA | other | BuOH yield, % | ||
| YSZ 300 | 9.0 | 24.8 | 11.7 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 2.8 | 8.6 | 3.4 | 20.2 | 2.0 | 14.9 | 1.8 |
| YSZ 400 | 24.7 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 63.9 | 2.3 | 12.8 | 15.8 |
| YSZ 500 | 24.2 | 5.3 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 1.6 | 69.2 | 1.1 | 9.8 | 16.8 |
| YSZ 700 | 9.7 | 8.9 | 3.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 6.5 | 0.4 | 4.0 | 0.9 | 70.2 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 6.8 |
| YSZ 900 | 2.5 | 30.0 | 8.9 | 1.0 | 23.6 | 0.9 | 7.0 | 2.8 | 15.7 | 1.8 | 8.4 | 0.4 | |
E—ethylene, BD—1.3-butadiene, DEE—diethyl ether, C3+—light alkenes, AA—acetaldehyde, Ac—acetone, EA—ethyl acetate, CA—crotonaldehyde, BuOH—n-butanol, n-HeOH—n-hexanol.
Figure 7Dependence of n-butanol productivity (mass and specific) on the calcination temperature of YSZ catalysts.
Overview of the Heterogeneous Catalysts for the EtOH to n-BuOH Vapor Phase Guerbet Condensation in a Flow Reactora
| catalyst | other reaction conditions | conversion (%) | selectivity (%) | yield (%) | refs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZrO2 | 300 | 0.1 | WHSV = 0.2 h–1 | 9.9 | 19.9 | 2.0 | ( |
| ZrO2–CeO2 | 300 | 0.1 | WHSV = 0.2 h–1 | 13.3 | 31.6 | 4.2 | ( |
| HAP (Sr/P = 1.70) | 300 | 0.1 | GHSV = 570 h–1; W/F = 130 g·h·mol–1 | 11.3 | 86.4 | 9.7 | ( |
| Mg3Fe | 350 | 0.1 | WHSV = 0.215 h–1; W/F = 24.7 g·h·mol–1 | 80.0 | 14.0 | 11.2 | ( |
| HAP (Ca/P = 1.64) | 300 | 0.1 | GHSV = 10 000 h–1; contact time 1.78 s | 14.7 | 76.3 | 11.2 | ( |
| Mg3AlO | 350 | 0.1 | GHSV = 960 h–1 | 34.0 | 37.0 | 12.6 | ( |
| YSZ 500 | 300 | 0.1 | WHSV = 0.2 h–1 | 24.2 | 69.2 | 16.8 | our results |
| Cu/HSACeO2 | 260 | 10 | LHSV = 1.97 h–1; supercritical CO2 reactor | 67.0 | 44.8 | 30.0 | ( |
GHSV—alcohols gas-hourly space velocity in stp (25 °C, 101 kPa), inert gas excluded; WHSV—weight hourly space velocity is the weight of feed flowing per unit of weight of the catalyst per hour; LHSV—liquid hourly space velocity is the volume of the feed flowing per unit of volume of the catalyst per hour; W/F—the contact time is expressed as the ratio of catalyst weight to total flow rate.