Literature DB >> 24009780

In Situ FT-IR Spectroscopic Study of CO2 and CO Adsorption on Y2O3, ZrO2, and Yttria-Stabilized ZrO2.

Eva-Maria Köck1, Michaela Kogler, Thomas Bielz, Bernhard Klötzer, Simon Penner.   

Abstract

In situ FT-IR spectroscopy was exploited to study the adsorption of CO2 and CO on commercially available yttria-stabilized ZrO2 (8 mol % Y, YSZ-8), Y2O3, and ZrO2. All three oxides were pretreated at high temperatures (1173 K) in air, which leads to effective dehydroxylation of pure ZrO2. Both Y2O3 and YSZ-8 show a much higher reactivity toward CO and CO2 adsorption than ZrO2 because of more facile rehydroxylation of Y-containing phases. Several different carbonate species have been observed following CO2 adsorption on Y2O3 and YSZ-8, which are much more strongly bound on the former, due to formation of higher-coordinated polydentate carbonate species upon annealing. As the crucial factor governing the formation of carbonates, the presence of reactive (basic) surface hydroxyl groups on Y-centers was identified. Therefore, chemisorption of CO2 most likely includes insertion of the CO2 molecule into a reactive surface hydroxyl group and the subsequent formation of a bicarbonate species. Formate formation following CO adsorption has been observed on all three oxides but is less pronounced on ZrO2 due to effective dehydroxylation of the surface during high-temperature treatment. The latter generally causes suppression of the surface reactivity of ZrO2 samples regarding reactions involving CO or CO2 as reaction intermediates.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24009780      PMCID: PMC3759166          DOI: 10.1021/jp405625x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces        ISSN: 1932-7447            Impact factor:   4.126


Introduction

Yttria-stabilized ZrO2 (YSZ) is already commonly used as a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrolyte and anode component.[1] However, despite its technological importance, YSZ itself is a very complex material, adopting different crystal structures (monoclinic, tetragonal, and cubic) with varying Y content below 20 mol %.[2] Of all the associated mixed oxide compounds, YSZ containing 8 mol % yttria is the most technologically important one. Therefore, on the one hand, the understanding of molecular processes on its surface is highly desirable, and on the other hand, insights into the surface reactivity of YSZ are also expected from in-depth studies of the two chemical constituents of the YSZ structure, that is, Y2O3 and ZrO2. The aim for a better understanding of the surface chemistry of the latter two oxides is also fueled by their technological relevance, comprising the use as ceramic materials or as catalysts for a number of chemical reactions.[3,4] However, despite their importance, the use of YSZ and ZrO2 strongly depends on the particular polymorph used. The most common modification of ZrO2 is the monoclinic structure that is the only thermodynamically stable phase until ∼1400 K, where a phase change to a tetragonal modification takes place. Above a temperature of ∼2600 K a cubic structure is present.[4] These polymorphic forms exhibit strikingly different chemical properties, giving rise to also different catalytic behavior. The tetragonal and the cubic phases are catalytically more active than their monoclinic counterpart.[5] Doping ZrO2 with Y2O3 stabilizes either the cubic or tetragonal phase (strongly depending on production technique) over a large temperature range and creates oxygen vacancies.[2,3] Thus, a lot of progress has been made especially regarding characterization of the surface chemistry of a variety of different ZrO2 samples. Materialwise, this essentially refers to supported metal/oxide systems[6−9] and sulfated ZrO2 samples.[7,10] Most data are available for pure ZrO2, with the exception of comparative adsorption studies of tetragonal and monoclinic ZrO2.[10−13] Strikingly different, information on the surface chemistry of Y2O3 and YSZ mixed oxide phases is virtually nonexistent, and adsorption studies essentially represent no-man’s land. Information on Y2O3 is restricted to FT-IR studies of supported Ru and Pd/Y2O3 systems and Er-doped Y2O3, being used as transparent ceramics.[14] Studies on YSZ by FT-IR spectroscopy are almost exclusively focused on investigating its crystal structure. One notable exception in that respect is the studies on ZrO2, doped with 3 mol % yttria, which usually serves as a compound to simulate tetragonal ZrO2.[10] The aim of our studies therefore is to provide a first comparison of the surface chemical properties of technically used YSZ with 8 mol % yttria content and its separated chemical constituents Y2O3 and ZrO2. As representative probe molecules, CO and CO2 were chosen, due to their importance as reactants in a variety of chemical reactions, including the water–gas shift reaction or other C1 reactions relevant to anodic fuel conversion in solid oxide fuel cells. As the perfect method for monitoring the adsorbed species under technically relevant conditions, a dedicated in situ FT-IR spectroscopy setup was used, allowing static and flowing treatments up to the bar range and elevated temperatures up to 773 K. Exceeding the scientific input from the simple comparison between the three oxidic materials, we also anticipate in-depth information on the reactivity of more complex reactions and materials. Special attention was also paid to a comparison of the determined surface reactivity to literature data, as especially oxide pretreatments are expected to strongly alter the adsorption behavior. Regarding surface studies on oxides, this essentially refers to the hydroxylation state of the surface.

Experimental Section

Materials

Commercial powders of Y2O3, ZrO2, and YSZ were used as starting materials. Cubic (bcc) Y2O3 (yttrium(III)oxide, nanopowder, <50 nm particle size) and tetragonal YSZ (zirconium(IV)oxide-yttria stabilized, nanopowder, containing 8 mol % Y2O3 as stabilizer, from now on called “YSZ-8”) were supplied by Sigma Aldrich and monoclinic ZrO2 (with a small amount of tetragonal phase after thermal annealing at 1173 K, zirconium(IV)oxide, 99.978%) by Alfa Aesar. All samples were pretreated by calcination at 1173 K in air and subsequently checked by XRD for structural changes upon annealing. The surface area after pretreatment was determined by nitrogen adsorption at 77 K according to the BET method as 21.7 m2/g (Y2O3), 31.6 m2/g (YSZ-8), and 10.4 m2/g (ZrO2). For BET measurements, a Quantachrome Nova 2000 Surface Area and Pore Size Analyzer was used. Gases were supplied by Messer (CO2 4.5 and CO 4.7).

FT-IR Studies

FT-IR spectra were recorded in transmission mode on a Perkin-Elmer FT-IR System 2000 spectrometer. The powder samples were pressed into thin pellets using a pressure of 2 t (sample mass about 100 mg each). The pellets were subsequently placed inside a homemade in situ reactor cell. The path length of the IR reactor cell amounts to 20 cm. This cell setup allows treatments under static and flowing conditions up to pressures of 1 bar and temperatures up to 873 K. The temperature is controlled by a thermocouple placed next to the pellet. Pretreatment of the powders was performed outside the cell (annealing up to 1173 K), and the pellet was mounted hot into the IR cell. Vacuum was applied immediately (10–6 mbar). Calcium fluoride is used as window material allowing access to wavelength ranges above 1000 cm–1. To ensure identical starting conditions, samples were oxidized with 20% oxygen seeded in helium at 873 K for one hour. To ensure a minimal degree of hydroxylation, during the flow mode measurements the gases are cleaned and dried using two liquid nitrogen or liquid nitrogen/ethanol cooling traps. Flowing measurements were performed under ambient conditions. In static mode, the gases are preadsorbed on a 5 Å zeolite trap binding water sufficiently strongly, before the dry gases are desorbed into the evacuated and degassed cell. All reported spectra are corrected with the spectrum of the dry preoxidized oxide pellet prior to adsorption.

Results and Discussion

CO2 Adsorption

Y2O3

Figure 1 shows an overview of effects associated with the static adsorption of dry CO2 on Y2O3 at room temperature using CO2 pressures up to 10 mbar.
Figure 1

Infrared spectra of static adsorption of CO2 on pure Y2O3 at room temperature at pressures up to 10 mbar.

Infrared spectra of static adsorption of CO2 on pure Y2O3 at room temperature at pressures up to 10 mbar. As it can be clearly seen, the adsorption leads to formation of a number of distinct (bi)carbonate and hydroxyl species. The assignment of the carbonate species (detailed representation in Figure 3) was based on recent investigations on carbonate formation on different Ga2O3 polymorphs,[15] where both experimental and theoretical information is most abundant and thus the assignment in the present case is most straightforward. The structure of the most likely analogous (bi)carbonate species[15] is highlighted in Figure S1 (Supporting Information).
Figure 3

Assignment of the infrared signals between 1900 and 1160 cm–1 of the observed (bi)carbonates on Y2O3 at room temperature at pressures up to 10 mbar.

A closer look at Figure 3 reveals that at a pressure of 3 × 10–5 mbar almost no formation of carbonates is observed, whereas raising the pressure up to 1 mbar leads to the formation of a dominant species with signals at 1674, 1397, and 1223 cm–1. During further pressure increase to 10 mbar, another species with signals at 1652, 1419, and 1223 cm–1 dominates the spectra. On the basis of ref (15), these peaks can be attributed to the νas, νs, and δOH vibration modes of monodentate and bidentate bicarbonates. The intensification of the latter peaks correlates with the decrease of signals at 3702 and 3676 cm–1 and an increase of the associated modes at 3658 and 3625 cm–1 (Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 2

Details of the room-temperature-collected infrared spectra of adsorbed CO2 on Y2O3 shown in Figure 1 in the wavenumber range between 3750 and 3540 cm–1 at pressures up to 10 mbar in the region of the hydroxyl stretching modes.

Details of the room-temperature-collected infrared spectra of adsorbed CO2 on Y2O3 shown in Figure 1 in the wavenumber range between 3750 and 3540 cm–1 at pressures up to 10 mbar in the region of the hydroxyl stretching modes. Assignment of the infrared signals between 1900 and 1160 cm–1 of the observed (bi)carbonates on Y2O3 at room temperature at pressures up to 10 mbar. Figure 2 shows that, according to refs (16 and 17), the negative peaks are related to ν(OH) modes of isolated surface hydroxyl groups of the oxide (more than one peak is visible due to the presence of differently coordinated hydroxyl groups), which become consumed by bicarbonate formation, and the accordingly positive signals can be associated with the ν(OH) modes of the newly formed hydroxyl groups of the bicarbonates. The intensity of the hydroxyl group at 3658 cm–1 correlates with the rise of the signals of the monodentate bicarbonate, whereas the signal at 3625 cm–1 matches the bidentate bicarbonate species. The analogous appearance of two different bicarbonate species was also observed on ceria samples.[17] The broad feature below 3500 cm–1 can be assigned to interacting hydroxyl groups of the formed bicarbonates. Hence, the main process associated with chemisorption of a CO2 molecule on Y2O3 is the insertion into a basic surface hydroxyl group leading to the formation of bicarbonates. Note that the experiments probably do not represent true thermodynamically equilibrated processes since the waiting time to reach an adsorption equilibrium had to be balanced against possible contamination of the surface especially at prolonged times. Following refs (15 and 18) the assignment to the different (bi)carbonate species is shown in Figure 3. Concerning the pattern of the peaks it is apparent that with increasing coordination of the (bi)carbonates a superposition of signals of the different adsorbed features occurs. As pointed out in ref (19) such an effect is due to the presence of different adsorption sites arising from different coordination of the metal atoms on the surface, especially on a powder sample. Also an interaction between different adsorbed species can not be excluded.[20] To test the thermal stability of the adsorbates, Figure 4 illustrates the thermal evolution of the (bi)carbonate species on Y2O3 in 10 mbar CO2 up to 873 K under static conditions.
Figure 4

Infrared spectra collected on Y2O3 after exposure of 10 mbar static CO2 upon heating to 873 K. Infrared spectra have been taken in 100 K steps. Important modes have been marked.

Infrared spectra collected on Y2O3 after exposure of 10 mbar static CO2 upon heating to 873 K. Infrared spectra have been taken in 100 K steps. Important modes have been marked. The bicarbonate species persist up to a temperature of 373 K, whereas the intensity of the peaks attributed to bidentate species decreases first. At 473 K the bicarbonates have vanished, and the remaining main species is the bridged carbonate, which subsequently is converted into polydentate carbonate species upon further temperature increase. Thus, at 873 K only signals of polydentate carbonate species are present. Hence, during heating the more weakly bound adsorbates are converted into more strongly bound carbonates. Summarizing, the process of this conversion, i.e., the binding strength of the different kinds of CO2 adsorbates with increasing temperature on Y2O3, follows the sequence monodentate bicarbonatebidentate bicarbonate → bridged carbonatepolydentate carbonate. Adsorbates on Y2O3, resulting from chemisorption of CO2, can therefore not be removed entirely by heating up to 873 K. Additional experiments (not shown) show that a “carbonate-poisoned” Y2O3 surface can only be successfully recovered by heating in dry oxygen up to 873 K, likely because of efficient surface reoxidation. A final comment on the spectroscopic requirements for studying carbonate formation on Y2O3 following CO2 adsorption should be added. As Y2O3 is very prone to hydroxylation, even by traces of H2O, carbonate formation is in turn highly favorable, but subsequent attribution to distinct carbonate species is not possible due to low resolution of the resulting spectra. This effect was observed in particular under “flowing CO2” conditions, which under the chosen experimental conditions are less dry. Consequently, only static CO2 adsorption under as dry as possible conditions, using a zeolite trap close to the IR cell for removing all traces of water from CO2, permits collecting highly resolved carbonate spectra.

YSZ-8

Experiments on yttria-stabilized ZrO2 (YSZ-8) under flowing conditions (CO2 flow = 0.4 mL s–1) show a behavior similar to pure Y2O3 at room temperature. In the case of YSZ-8, flowing conditions were chosen to achieve more intense and thus more reliably interpretable signals because on YSZ-8 the carbonate adsorbates are generally more weakly bound as compared to on Y2O3. As apparent from Figure 5, showing also the thermal evolution of the carbonate species, the formation of Y2O3-analogous bi- and bridged carbonate species can also be observed.
Figure 5

Infrared spectra collected during heating YSZ-8 in dry flowing CO2 (CO2 flow = 0.4 mL/s) up to 873 K together with the assignment of the observed (bi-) carbonates at room temperature.

Infrared spectra collected during heating YSZ-8 in dry flowing CO2 (CO2 flow = 0.4 mL/s) up to 873 K together with the assignment of the observed (bi-) carbonates at room temperature. The broad features located at 1305 cm–1 can be ascribed to the νs mode of the bridged carbonate, and the other main adsorbate signals at 1646, 1429, and 1225 cm–1 represent the corresponding bidentate carbonate. We note that the adsorption behavior of YSZ-8 very much resembles that of pure Y2O3 (cf. Figure 3) and is crucially different from spectra obtained on YSZ phases with a lower amount of Y, i.e., 3 mol %.[11] The latter is usually termed “tetragonal ZrO2” in the literature and also adsorption-wise closely matches pure tetragonal ZrO2.[12] In contrast to what was observed on pure Y2O3, (bi)carbonates on a YSZ-8 surface can be easily removed by heating, and almost no signals arising from polydentate carbonate species can be detected. Above a temperature of 573 K, these adsorbates decompose completely (Figure 5), although in this experiment flowing conditions with a pressure of 1 bar were chosen.

ZrO2

On pure monoclinic ZrO2, only very weak adsorption signals of CO2 were observed after annealing in CO2 pressures up to 12 mbar (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Infrared spectra taken after static adsorption of CO2 on ZrO2 at room temperature at pressures up to 12 mbar.

Infrared spectra taken after static adsorption of CO2 on ZrO2 at room temperature at pressures up to 12 mbar. Static conditions with pressures below 12 mbar were enough to saturate the surface with chemisorbed species. Therefore, higher pressures or even flowing conditions do not intensify the very weak (bi)carbonate signals. Nevertheless, the vibrations at 1628, 1431, and 1223 cm–1 can be associated with a bicarbonate species on the surface. These signals very much coincide with literature-reported spectra taken on pure monoclinic ZrO2.[11] However, in our case only very weak signals are observed, which is essentially due to the strong dehydroxylation treatment, conducted prior to the FT-IR measurements. Spectra shown in ref (11) (Figure 2 of that reference) clearly show peaks of surface hydroxyl groups, which are almost absent in our case. The starting pressure of 2 mbar at room temperature was enough to saturate the surface, and thus any further increase of the CO2 pressure did not influence the spectra. This corroborates the assumption that hydroxyl groups are of crucial importance for the chemisorption of CO2. The following heating of ZrO2 in CO2 did not lead to reliably interpretable spectra due to the low signal-to-noise ratio.

Comparison of Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 upon CO2 Adsorption

All oxides were pretreated by heating in air up to 1173 K, which leads to effective dehydroxylation of the surface. Only in the case of pure ZrO2, no rehydroxylation was observed, even in the presence of water vapor at temperatures up to 873 K (see Figure S2, Supporting Information, also showing a comparison of the three oxides upon H2O adsorption). As a result, ZrO2 remains almost unreactive for CO2 adsorption. This emphasizes the fact that surface hydroxyl species are important for effective chemisorption of CO2. The comparison of the three oxides Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 during exposure to CO2 at room temperature and 873 K is highlighted in Figure 7 (concerning the assignment to (bi)carbonate species, see Table 1).
Figure 7

Comparison of the collected infrared spectra upon CO2 adsorption at room temperature (lower panel) and 873 K (upper panel) on the surfaces of the oxides Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2.

Table 1

Observed Wave Numbers and Assignment of the Peaks to (Bi-)carbonate Species Following CO2 Adsorption on Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2

oxidecarbonate speciesνas(CO3) [cm–1]νs(CO3) [cm–1]δ(OH) [cm–1]ν(OH) [cm–1]
Y2O3monodentate bicarbonate1674139712233658
bidentate bicarbonate1652141912233625
bridged carbonate15851334  
poly dentate carbonate14521388  
YSZ-8bidentate bicarbonate164614291225not determined
bridged carbonatenot determined1305  
ZrO2bicarbonate162814311223 
Comparison of the collected infrared spectra upon CO2 adsorption at room temperature (lower panel) and 873 K (upper panel) on the surfaces of the oxides Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2. At room temperature, Y2O3 and YSZ-8 show a very similar behavior (with the exception of a different distribution of the (bi)carbonate species), suggesting that the hydroxylated yttrium centers in YSZ-8 are the reactive sites of the mixed oxide. Upon heating YSZ-8 to at least 673 K, the adsorbed carbonate species are completely removed, indicating weaker bonding than on pure Y2O3, which is also reflected by the eventual absence of strongly bound polydentate carbonate species. As a conclusion from measurements on pure Y2O3, the monodentate bicarbonate must be more strongly bound than the bidentate carbonate, and the conversion to the associated bridged species—bound to two yttrium atoms—is the essential step toward even more strongly bound species, which are hard to remove. Most likely, the monodentate bicarbonate is not only bound to an yttrium atom via one of its oxygen atoms but also stabilized through a hydrogen bond with a neighboring hydroxyl group. In contrast, YSZ-8 obviously does not exhibit these neighboring Y2O3 centers. If water binds dissociatively onto a defect caused by a Y3+ in the ZrO2 lattice, a HO– bound to the yttrium (because of its basicity) is formed. This is the adsorption site for a CO2 molecule to subsequently form a (bi-)carbonate species. In the case of a bridged carbonate, this species is more likely bound to a yttrium and a zirconium atom than to two adjacent Y3+ centers, and this seems to make the difference in the binding strength of this particular species. Comparing the carbonate spectra provided by Pokrovski et al.[12] and Baeza et al.[11] obtained on different hydroxylated ZrO2 polymorphs, we note remarkable similarities in the overall features of the carbonate regions but a slightly different population of the different (bi)carbonate species. On pure Y2O3, the bicarbonate species are dominating, whereas on YSZ-8, the relative fraction of bidentate and bridged carbonate species is higher. In close correlation, the spectra of Pokrovski et al. show a higher fraction of bridged species. Most important, the spectra obtained on tetragonal ZrO2 are strikingly different from those observed on YSZ-8. The main species on tetragonal ZrO2, as reported by Baeza et al.[11] and Pokrovski et al.,[12] are polydentate carbonate species already after adsorption at room temperature (cf. Figure 3 of ref (12)). However, despite the different distribution of bicarbonate, bidentate, and bridged carbonates, no polydentate carbonates are found on YSZ-8, further confirming that the adsorption of YSZ is basically dominated by the hydroxylated Y centers.

CO Adsorption

Besides molecular adsorption as “intact” CO, for the adsorption of a CO molecule and following reaction to CO2 on an oxide surface, two mechanisms are in principle possible:[14,21] (i) the CO molecule reacts with an oxygen atom of the lattice to form CO2 and leaves an oxygen vacancy behind or (ii) it inserts into a surface hydroxyl group, forms a formate, and this intermediate subsequently decomposes into CO2 (or reacts backward to CO and OH). Figure S3 (Supporting Information) shows the possible formate species on an oxide surface. Figure 8 shows Y2O3 heated in 290 mbar CO under static measurement conditions (main panel).
Figure 8

Infrared spectra taken upon heating Y2O3 in 290 mbar CO under static measurement conditions up to 773 K (upper panel) and with details of the wavenumber region above 2700 cm–1 (right lower panel) and below 1700 cm–1 (left lower panel).

Infrared spectra taken upon heating Y2O3 in 290 mbar CO under static measurement conditions up to 773 K (upper panel) and with details of the wavenumber region above 2700 cm–1 (right lower panel) and below 1700 cm–1 (left lower panel). At room temperature, no adsorption or reaction takes place, but during heating, CO2 formation starts at 373 K. As an intermediate of this reaction, signals of formates can be detected, with an intensity maximum reached at 573 K. The corresponding vibrations for the νas and the νs mode of the formate are at 1595 and 1381 cm–1, and the related ν(CH) vibration is located at 2856 cm–1. Also the decrease of surface hydroxyl groups (left lower panel) can be detected starting from a temperature of 373 K at 3704 and 3672 cm–1, which illustrates the analogy to the above-mentioned observations regarding CO2 adsorption/carbonate formation. Above a temperature of 573 K the formates are rapidly decomposed. Because of the formation of CO2, vibration modes for carbonates are observed as well—especially in analogy to the measurements in CO2 at 473 K the bridged carbonate is the main species. At 773 K the polydentate carbonate is again predominant (right lower panel). Accompanied by the already mentioned formate signals, combination modes, namely, ν1(combi) (νas(CO2 + δ(CH)) at 2972 cm–1 and ν2(combi) (νs(CO2) + δ(CH)) at 2727 cm–1, are observed (lower left panel).[18,21] On the basis of refs (18 and 21) the observed formate species are assigned to a bidentate or bridged species. Starting from room temperature, weak signals are observed at 1630 and 1294 cm–1, which may be arising from monodentate formate species. Comparing our results to those of the literature,[19−21] it is generally assumed that the monodentate species is the more reactive and less stable one. Therefore, the bidentate or bridged formate species could be mainly a spectator below 773 K. Figure 9 shows YSZ-8 heated in flowing CO (CO flow = 0.2 mL s–1).
Figure 9

Infrared spectra collected upon heating YSZ-8 in flowing CO (CO flow = 0.2 mL s–1) up to 873 K. Infrared spectra have been taken in 100 K steps.

Infrared spectra collected upon heating YSZ-8 in flowing CO (CO flow = 0.2 mL s–1) up to 873 K. Infrared spectra have been taken in 100 K steps. As for CO2, flowing conditions were chosen for YSZ-8 because of better interpretable spectra due to increased adsorption of surface species. At room temperature, no signals of any adsorbed molecules are detected. However, the processes on YSZ-8 are again quite similar to those observed on Y2O3, with the exception that the spectra are more easy to interpret because of no disturbing (bi)carbonates. CO2 formation starts at 573 K, and in-parallel typical formate peaks at 2875 cm–1 for the ν(CH) mode and 1581, 1384, and 1357 cm–1 representing the νas(OCO), the δ(CH), and the νas(OCO) mode of the formate arise. The combination modes are less pronounced as compared to Y2O3. These formate vibration modes are visible up to a temperature of 675 K, and above 773 K the same spectra fingerprint as for CO2 adsorption is observed. In other words, no adsorbates are detected anymore. During heating, also a decrease of signals at 3690, 3643, and 3613 cm–1, attributed to surface hydroxyl groups, occurs. Interestingly, on YSZ-8 no signals for monodentate formate species are visible. To ensure full correlation with the CO2 measurements, static conditions are again chosen. Also by analogy to CO2 adsorption, pure dehydroxylated ZrO2 did not show significant signals attributable to surface adsorbates in static CO (Figure 10).
Figure 10

Infrared spectra collected upon heating ZrO2 following static adsorption of 248 mbar CO up to 873 K. Infrared spectra have been taken in 100 K steps.

Infrared spectra collected upon heating ZrO2 following static adsorption of 248 mbar CO up to 873 K. Infrared spectra have been taken in 100 K steps. This essentially verifies that no defects (which are usually titrated by molecular CO adsorption[7]) and no substantial amount of hydroxyl groups are present because of the oxidizing high-temperature pretreatment of the sample. However, during heating in 248 mbar CO at 573 K, very weak peaks at 2361 and 2875 cm–1 being attributable to ν(CH) and/or combination modes of formates are observed (see left inset). The associated broad signals in the region below 1600 cm–1 are too weak for an appropriate interpretation. We note that all oxides were pretreated by heating up to 1173 K in air to reduce impurities, and in the case of ZrO2 no rehydroxylation takes place. Because of the lack of surface hydroxyl groups only a minute amount of formates can in turn be formed.

Comparison of Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 Regarding CO Adsorption

The comparison of the adsorption behavior during exposure to CO at maximum formate signal, namely, at 573 K, is highlighted in Figure 11.
Figure 11

Comparison of the infrared spectra of the oxides Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 at maximum formate signal (573 K).

Comparison of the infrared spectra of the oxides Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 at maximum formate signal (573 K). On none of the three studied oxides were signals of adsorbed (physisorbed) CO detected, as was previously shown for more defective ZrO2 samples.[10] We might anticipate that all defects are therefore quenched upon the preannealing in oxygen to 1173 K. Note that our results strongly suggest that in line with the initial question about the mechanism of CO2 formation following CO adsorption a mechanism including the participation of surface OH-groups is found to be most likely prevailing (mechanism ii). Substantial reduction of the oxides is therefore less likely, and this assumption is also corroborated by additional electric impedance measurements, which only show the reversible formation of thermally excited charge carriers but no substantial formation of surface defects (Figure S4, Supporting Information). Table 2 summarizes the main formate vibration modes observed on all oxides.
Table 2

Observed Wave Numbers and Assignment of the Peaks to Formate Species Following CO Adsorption of Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2

oxideνas [cm–1]νs [cm–1]ν(CH) [cm–1]
Y2O3159513812856
YSZ-8158113572875
ZrO2not determinednot determined2875
Like in the case of CO2 adsorption, the comparison of the oxides shows that the yttrium amount in YSZ-8 is important for chemisorption reactivity because in contrast to pure ZrO2 the surface of the mixed oxide can be easily reactivated after dehydroxylation. This again corroborates the assumption that the basic surface hydroxyl species on Y-centers are also important for the conversion of CO toward formates. On YSZ-8, the carbonates—resulting from adsorption of the formed CO2—are not bound as strongly as on Y2O3 and thus do not interfere with the formates.

Conclusion

Using FT-IR spectroscopy investigations, surface reaction-induced adsorbates of CO2 and CO on the technically relevant oxides Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 could be identified. Y2O3 and YSZ-8 show much higher reactivity toward both CO2 and CO adsorption than ZrO2. The reversible formation and basic presence of surface hydroxyl groups is a crucial factor of an active surface, and the yttrium centers in YSZ-8 seem to essentially exhibit this quality. Thus, they are the C1-reactive sites of the mixed oxide YSZ-8. On Y2O3 and YSZ-8, several kinds of carbonates are detected, whereby in general on Y2O3 the adsorbates are more difficult to remove because of obviously easier conversion to more strongly bound, higher-coordinated species. The mechanism of chemisorption of CO2 most likely proceeds via an insertion of the CO2 molecule into a surface hydroxyl group and the following formation of a bicarbonate. Further conversion into more strongly bound carbonate species is observed at higher temperatures. In the case of CO oxidation the formation of formate intermediates is observed on all oxides, but the absence of a significant amount of hydroxyl groups on ZrO2 leads to very weak signals on this oxide. The present FT-IR spectroscopic study moreover suggests that SOFC-related C1 reactions (water–gas shift reaction, intermediates of CH4 reforming) on YSZ-based cermet anodes may be mechanistically/kinetically influenced by the basic character and by the pronounced reversibility and degree of hydroxylation of the Y-centers in YSZ-8.
  2 in total

1.  Infrared spectroscopic study of the carbon dioxide adsorption on the surface of Ga2O3 polymorphs.

Authors:  Sebastián E Collins; Miguel A Baltanás; Adrian L Bonivardi
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Stability of formate species on beta-Ga2O3.

Authors:  M Calatayud; S E Collins; M A Baltanás; A L Bonivardi
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 3.676

  2 in total
  11 in total

1.  Hydrogen Surface Reactions and Adsorption Studied on Y2O3, YSZ, and ZrO2.

Authors:  Michaela Kogler; Eva-Maria Köck; Thomas Bielz; Kristian Pfaller; Bernhard Klötzer; Daniela Schmidmair; Lukas Perfler; Simon Penner
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.126

2.  High-Temperature Carbon Deposition on Oxide Surfaces by CO Disproportionation.

Authors:  Michaela Kogler; Eva-Maria Köck; Bernhard Klötzer; Thomas Schachinger; Wolfgang Wallisch; Raphael Henn; Christian W Huck; Clivia Hejny; Simon Penner
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 4.126

3.  Adsorption and Reaction of CO on (Pd-)Al2O3 and (Pd-)ZrO2: Vibrational Spectroscopy of Carbonate Formation.

Authors:  Karin Föttinger; Waltraud Emhofer; David Lennon; Günther Rupprechter
Journal:  Top Catal       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.910

4.  Comparative study on the catalytic activity of Fe-doped ZrO2 nanoparticles without significant toxicity through chemical treatment under various pH conditions.

Authors:  Hye-In Song; Jung A Hong; Hangil Lee; Kwang-Il Lim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Highly Efficient Photothermal Reduction of CO2 on Pd2Cu Dispersed TiO2 Photocatalyst and Operando DRIFT Spectroscopic Analysis of Reactive Intermediates.

Authors:  Munirathinam Elavarasan; Willie Yang; Sethupathi Velmurugan; Jyy-Ning Chen; Thomas C-K Yang; Toshiyuki Yokoi
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  Decoupling the Chemical and Mechanical Strain Effect on Steering the CO2 Activation over CeO2-Based Oxides: An Experimental and DFT Approach.

Authors:  Kyriaki Polychronopoulou; Sara AlKhoori; Shaima AlBedwawi; Seba Alareeqi; Aseel G S Hussien; Michalis A Vasiliades; Angelos M Efstathiou; Klito C Petallidou; Nirpendra Singh; Dalaver H Anjum; Lourdes F Vega; Mark A Baker
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 10.383

7.  Evaluation of CO2 and H2O Adsorption on a Porous Polymer Using DFT and In Situ DRIFT Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Giulia E M Schukraft; Ioanna Itskou; Robert T Woodward; Bart Van Der Linden; Camille Petit; Atsushi Urakawa
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Methane Decomposition and Carbon Growth on Y2O3, Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia, and ZrO2.

Authors:  Michaela Kogler; Eva-Maria Köck; Lukas Perfler; Thomas Bielz; Michael Stöger-Pollach; Walid Hetaba; Marc Willinger; Xing Huang; Manfred Schuster; Bernhard Klötzer; Simon Penner
Journal:  Chem Mater       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 9.811

9.  Green Tea Polyphenols Coupled with a Bioactive Titanium Alloy Surface: In Vitro Characterization of Osteoinductive Behavior through a KUSA A1 Cell Study.

Authors:  Martina Cazzola; Sara Ferraris; Francesco Boschetto; Alfredo Rondinella; Elia Marin; Wenliang Zhu; Giuseppe Pezzotti; Enrica Vernè; Silvia Spriano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia as a High-Performance Catalyst for Ethanol to n-Butanol Guerbet Coupling.

Authors:  Nina V Vlasenko; Pavlo I Kyriienko; Karina V Valihura; Gulnara R Kosmambetova; Sergii O Soloviev; Peter E Strizhak
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.