In situ FT-IR spectroscopy was exploited to study the adsorption of CO2 and CO on commercially available yttria-stabilized ZrO2 (8 mol % Y, YSZ-8), Y2O3, and ZrO2. All three oxides were pretreated at high temperatures (1173 K) in air, which leads to effective dehydroxylation of pure ZrO2. Both Y2O3 and YSZ-8 show a much higher reactivity toward CO and CO2 adsorption than ZrO2 because of more facile rehydroxylation of Y-containing phases. Several different carbonate species have been observed following CO2 adsorption on Y2O3 and YSZ-8, which are much more strongly bound on the former, due to formation of higher-coordinated polydentate carbonate species upon annealing. As the crucial factor governing the formation of carbonates, the presence of reactive (basic) surface hydroxyl groups on Y-centers was identified. Therefore, chemisorption of CO2 most likely includes insertion of the CO2 molecule into a reactive surface hydroxyl group and the subsequent formation of a bicarbonate species. Formate formation following CO adsorption has been observed on all three oxides but is less pronounced on ZrO2 due to effective dehydroxylation of the surface during high-temperature treatment. The latter generally causes suppression of the surface reactivity of ZrO2 samples regarding reactions involving CO or CO2 as reaction intermediates.
In situ FT-IR spectroscopy was exploited to study the adsorption of CO2 and CO on commercially available yttria-stabilized ZrO2 (8 mol % Y, YSZ-8), Y2O3, and ZrO2. All three oxides were pretreated at high temperatures (1173 K) in air, which leads to effective dehydroxylation of pure ZrO2. Both Y2O3 and YSZ-8 show a much higher reactivity toward CO and CO2 adsorption than ZrO2 because of more facile rehydroxylation of Y-containing phases. Several different carbonate species have been observed following CO2 adsorption on Y2O3 and YSZ-8, which are much more strongly bound on the former, due to formation of higher-coordinated polydentate carbonate species upon annealing. As the crucial factor governing the formation of carbonates, the presence of reactive (basic) surface hydroxyl groups on Y-centers was identified. Therefore, chemisorption of CO2 most likely includes insertion of the CO2 molecule into a reactive surface hydroxyl group and the subsequent formation of a bicarbonate species. Formate formation following CO adsorption has been observed on all three oxides but is less pronounced on ZrO2 due to effective dehydroxylation of the surface during high-temperature treatment. The latter generally causes suppression of the surface reactivity of ZrO2 samples regarding reactions involving CO or CO2 as reaction intermediates.
Yttria-stabilized ZrO2 (YSZ) is already commonly used
as a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrolyte and anode component.[1] However, despite its technological importance,
YSZ itself is a very complex material, adopting different crystal
structures (monoclinic, tetragonal, and cubic) with varying Y content
below 20 mol %.[2] Of all the associated
mixed oxide compounds, YSZ containing 8 mol % yttria is the most technologically
important one. Therefore, on the one hand, the understanding of molecular
processes on its surface is highly desirable, and on the other hand,
insights into the surface reactivity of YSZ are also expected from
in-depth studies of the two chemical constituents of the YSZ structure,
that is, Y2O3 and ZrO2. The aim for
a better understanding of the surface chemistry of the latter two
oxides is also fueled by their technological relevance, comprising
the use as ceramic materials or as catalysts for a number of chemical
reactions.[3,4] However, despite their importance, the use
of YSZ and ZrO2 strongly depends on the particular polymorph
used. The most common modification of ZrO2 is the monoclinic
structure that is the only thermodynamically stable phase until ∼1400
K, where a phase change to a tetragonal modification takes place.
Above a temperature of ∼2600 K a cubic structure is present.[4] These polymorphic forms exhibit strikingly different
chemical properties, giving rise to also different catalytic behavior.
The tetragonal and the cubic phases are catalytically more active
than their monoclinic counterpart.[5] Doping
ZrO2 with Y2O3 stabilizes either
the cubic or tetragonal phase (strongly depending on production technique)
over a large temperature range and creates oxygen vacancies.[2,3] Thus, a lot of progress has been made especially regarding characterization
of the surface chemistry of a variety of different ZrO2 samples. Materialwise, this essentially refers to supported metal/oxide
systems[6−9] and sulfated ZrO2 samples.[7,10] Most data
are available for pure ZrO2, with the exception of comparative
adsorption studies of tetragonal and monoclinic ZrO2.[10−13] Strikingly different, information on the surface chemistry of Y2O3 and YSZ mixed oxide phases is virtually nonexistent,
and adsorption studies essentially represent no-man’s land.
Information on Y2O3 is restricted to FT-IR studies
of supported Ru and Pd/Y2O3 systems and Er-doped
Y2O3, being used as transparent ceramics.[14] Studies on YSZ by FT-IR spectroscopy are almost
exclusively focused on investigating its crystal structure. One notable
exception in that respect is the studies on ZrO2, doped
with 3 mol % yttria, which usually serves as a compound to simulate
tetragonal ZrO2.[10]The
aim of our studies therefore is to provide a first comparison
of the surface chemical properties of technically used YSZ with 8
mol % yttria content and its separated chemical constituents Y2O3 and ZrO2. As representative probe
molecules, CO and CO2 were chosen, due to their importance
as reactants in a variety of chemical reactions, including the water–gas
shift reaction or other C1 reactions relevant to anodic fuel conversion
in solid oxide fuel cells. As the perfect method for monitoring the
adsorbed species under technically relevant conditions, a dedicated
in situ FT-IR spectroscopy setup was used, allowing static and flowing
treatments up to the bar range and elevated temperatures up to 773
K. Exceeding the scientific input from the simple comparison between
the three oxidic materials, we also anticipate in-depth information
on the reactivity of more complex reactions and materials. Special
attention was also paid to a comparison of the determined surface
reactivity to literature data, as especially oxide pretreatments are
expected to strongly alter the adsorption behavior. Regarding surface
studies on oxides, this essentially refers to the hydroxylation state
of the surface.
Experimental Section
Materials
Commercial powders of Y2O3, ZrO2, and YSZ were used as starting
materials. Cubic (bcc) Y2O3 (yttrium(III)oxide,
nanopowder, <50 nm particle size) and tetragonal YSZ (zirconium(IV)oxide-yttria
stabilized, nanopowder, containing 8 mol % Y2O3 as stabilizer, from now on called “YSZ-8”) were supplied
by Sigma Aldrich and monoclinic ZrO2 (with a small amount
of tetragonal phase after thermal annealing at 1173 K, zirconium(IV)oxide,
99.978%) by Alfa Aesar. All samples were pretreated by calcination
at 1173 K in air and subsequently checked by XRD for structural changes
upon annealing. The surface area after pretreatment was determined
by nitrogen adsorption at 77 K according to the BET method as 21.7
m2/g (Y2O3), 31.6 m2/g
(YSZ-8), and 10.4 m2/g (ZrO2). For BET measurements,
a Quantachrome Nova 2000 Surface Area and Pore Size Analyzer was used.
Gases were supplied by Messer (CO2 4.5 and CO 4.7).
FT-IR Studies
FT-IR spectra were
recorded in transmission mode on a Perkin-Elmer FT-IR System 2000
spectrometer. The powder samples were pressed into thin pellets using
a pressure of 2 t (sample mass about 100 mg each). The pellets were
subsequently placed inside a homemade in situ reactor cell. The path
length of the IR reactor cell amounts to 20 cm. This cell setup allows
treatments under static and flowing conditions up to pressures of
1 bar and temperatures up to 873 K. The temperature is controlled
by a thermocouple placed next to the pellet. Pretreatment of the powders
was performed outside the cell (annealing up to 1173 K), and the pellet
was mounted hot into the IR cell. Vacuum was applied immediately (10–6 mbar). Calcium fluoride is used as window material
allowing access to wavelength ranges above 1000 cm–1. To ensure identical starting conditions, samples were oxidized
with 20% oxygen seeded in helium at 873 K for one hour. To ensure
a minimal degree of hydroxylation, during the flow mode measurements
the gases are cleaned and dried using two liquid nitrogen or liquid
nitrogen/ethanol cooling traps. Flowing measurements were performed
under ambient conditions. In static mode, the gases are preadsorbed
on a 5 Å zeolite trap binding water sufficiently strongly, before
the dry gases are desorbed into the evacuated and degassed cell. All
reported spectra are corrected with the spectrum of the dry preoxidized
oxide pellet prior to adsorption.
Results
and Discussion
CO2 Adsorption
Y2O3
Figure 1 shows an overview of effects associated with the
static adsorption of dry CO2 on Y2O3 at room temperature using CO2 pressures up to 10 mbar.
Figure 1
Infrared
spectra of static adsorption of CO2 on pure
Y2O3 at room temperature at pressures up to
10 mbar.
Infrared
spectra of static adsorption of CO2 on pure
Y2O3 at room temperature at pressures up to
10 mbar.As it can be clearly seen, the
adsorption leads to formation of
a number of distinct (bi)carbonate and hydroxyl species. The assignment
of the carbonate species (detailed representation in Figure 3) was based on recent investigations on carbonate
formation on different Ga2O3 polymorphs,[15] where both experimental and theoretical information
is most abundant and thus the assignment in the present case is most
straightforward. The structure of the most likely analogous (bi)carbonate
species[15] is highlighted in Figure S1 (Supporting Information).
Figure 3
Assignment of the infrared
signals between 1900 and 1160 cm–1 of the observed
(bi)carbonates on Y2O3 at room temperature at
pressures up to 10 mbar.
A closer look
at Figure 3 reveals that at
a pressure of 3 × 10–5 mbar almost no formation
of carbonates is observed, whereas raising the pressure up to 1 mbar
leads to the formation of a dominant species with signals at 1674,
1397, and 1223 cm–1. During further pressure increase
to 10 mbar, another species with signals at 1652, 1419, and 1223 cm–1 dominates the spectra. On the basis of ref (15), these peaks can be attributed
to the νas, νs, and δOH vibration modes of monodentate and bidentatebicarbonates.
The intensification of the latter peaks correlates with the decrease
of signals at 3702 and 3676 cm–1 and an increase
of the associated modes at 3658 and 3625 cm–1 (Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 2
Details of the room-temperature-collected infrared spectra of adsorbed
CO2 on Y2O3 shown in Figure 1 in the wavenumber range between 3750 and 3540 cm–1 at pressures up to 10 mbar in the region of the hydroxyl
stretching modes.
Details of the room-temperature-collected infrared spectra of adsorbed
CO2 on Y2O3 shown in Figure 1 in the wavenumber range between 3750 and 3540 cm–1 at pressures up to 10 mbar in the region of the hydroxyl
stretching modes.Assignment of the infrared
signals between 1900 and 1160 cm–1 of the observed
(bi)carbonates on Y2O3 at room temperature at
pressures up to 10 mbar.Figure 2 shows that, according to
refs (16 and 17), the negative peaks
are related
to ν(OH) modes of isolated surface hydroxyl groups of the oxide
(more than one peak is visible due to the presence of differently
coordinated hydroxyl groups), which become consumed by bicarbonate
formation, and the accordingly positive signals can be associated
with the ν(OH) modes of the newly formed hydroxyl groups of
the bicarbonates. The intensity of the hydroxyl group at 3658 cm–1 correlates with the rise of the signals of the monodentatebicarbonate, whereas the signal at 3625 cm–1 matches
the bidentatebicarbonate species. The analogous appearance of two
different bicarbonate species was also observed on ceria samples.[17] The broad feature below 3500 cm–1 can be assigned to interacting hydroxyl groups of the formed bicarbonates.
Hence, the main process associated with chemisorption of a CO2 molecule on Y2O3 is the insertion into
a basic surface hydroxyl group leading to the formation of bicarbonates.
Note that the experiments probably do not represent true thermodynamically
equilibrated processes since the waiting time to reach an adsorption
equilibrium had to be balanced against possible contamination of the
surface especially at prolonged times.Following refs (15 and 18) the assignment to the different
(bi)carbonate species is shown in
Figure 3. Concerning the pattern of the peaks
it is apparent that with increasing coordination of the (bi)carbonates
a superposition of signals of the different adsorbed features occurs.
As pointed out in ref (19) such an effect is due to the presence of different adsorption sites
arising from different coordination of the metal atoms on the surface,
especially on a powder sample. Also an interaction between different
adsorbed species can not be excluded.[20]To test the thermal stability of the adsorbates, Figure 4 illustrates the thermal evolution of the (bi)carbonate
species on Y2O3 in 10 mbar CO2 up
to 873 K under static conditions.
Figure 4
Infrared spectra collected on Y2O3 after
exposure of 10 mbar static CO2 upon heating to 873 K. Infrared
spectra have been taken in 100 K steps. Important modes have been
marked.
Infrared spectra collected on Y2O3 after
exposure of 10 mbar static CO2 upon heating to 873 K. Infrared
spectra have been taken in 100 K steps. Important modes have been
marked.The bicarbonate species persist
up to a temperature of 373 K, whereas
the intensity of the peaks attributed to bidentate species decreases
first. At 473 K the bicarbonates have vanished, and the remaining
main species is the bridged carbonate, which subsequently is converted
into polydentate carbonate species upon further temperature increase.
Thus, at 873 K only signals of polydentate carbonate species are present.
Hence, during heating the more weakly bound adsorbates are converted
into more strongly bound carbonates. Summarizing, the process of this
conversion, i.e., the binding strength of the different kinds of CO2 adsorbates with increasing temperature on Y2O3, follows the sequence monodentate bicarbonate → bidentatebicarbonate → bridged carbonate → polydentate carbonate.
Adsorbates on Y2O3, resulting from chemisorption
of CO2, can therefore not be removed entirely by heating
up to 873 K. Additional experiments (not shown) show that a “carbonate-poisoned”
Y2O3 surface can only be successfully recovered
by heating in dry oxygen up to 873 K, likely because of efficient
surface reoxidation.A final comment on the spectroscopic requirements
for studying
carbonate formation on Y2O3 following CO2 adsorption should be added. As Y2O3 is very prone to hydroxylation, even by traces of H2O,
carbonate formation is in turn highly favorable, but subsequent attribution
to distinct carbonate species is not possible due to low resolution
of the resulting spectra. This effect was observed in particular under
“flowing CO2” conditions, which under the
chosen experimental conditions are less dry. Consequently, only static
CO2 adsorption under as dry as possible conditions, using
a zeolite trap close to the IR cell for removing all traces of water
from CO2, permits collecting highly resolved carbonate
spectra.
YSZ-8
Experiments
on yttria-stabilized
ZrO2 (YSZ-8) under flowing conditions (CO2 flow
= 0.4 mL s–1) show a behavior similar to pure Y2O3 at room temperature. In the case of YSZ-8, flowing
conditions were chosen to achieve more intense and thus more reliably
interpretable signals because on YSZ-8 the carbonate adsorbates are
generally more weakly bound as compared to on Y2O3. As apparent from Figure 5, showing also
the thermal evolution of the carbonate species, the formation of Y2O3-analogous bi- and bridged carbonate species
can also be observed.
Figure 5
Infrared spectra collected during heating YSZ-8 in dry
flowing
CO2 (CO2 flow = 0.4 mL/s) up to 873 K together
with the assignment of the observed (bi-) carbonates at room temperature.
Infrared spectra collected during heating YSZ-8 in dry
flowing
CO2 (CO2 flow = 0.4 mL/s) up to 873 K together
with the assignment of the observed (bi-) carbonates at room temperature.The broad features located at
1305 cm–1 can be
ascribed to the νs mode of the bridged carbonate,
and the other main adsorbate signals at 1646, 1429, and 1225 cm–1 represent the corresponding bidentate carbonate.
We note that the adsorption behavior of YSZ-8 very much resembles
that of pure Y2O3 (cf. Figure 3) and is crucially different from spectra obtained on YSZ
phases with a lower amount of Y, i.e., 3 mol %.[11] The latter is usually termed “tetragonal ZrO2” in the literature and also adsorption-wise closely
matches pure tetragonal ZrO2.[12] In contrast to what was observed on pure Y2O3, (bi)carbonates on a YSZ-8 surface can be easily removed by heating,
and almost no signals arising from polydentate carbonate species can
be detected. Above a temperature of 573 K, these adsorbates decompose
completely (Figure 5), although in this experiment
flowing conditions with a pressure of 1 bar were chosen.
ZrO2
On pure monoclinic
ZrO2, only very weak adsorption signals of CO2 were observed after annealing in CO2 pressures up to
12 mbar (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Infrared spectra taken
after static adsorption of CO2 on ZrO2 at room
temperature at pressures up to 12 mbar.
Infrared spectra taken
after static adsorption of CO2 on ZrO2 at room
temperature at pressures up to 12 mbar.Static conditions with pressures below 12 mbar were enough
to saturate
the surface with chemisorbed species. Therefore, higher pressures
or even flowing conditions do not intensify the very weak (bi)carbonate
signals. Nevertheless, the vibrations at 1628, 1431, and 1223 cm–1 can be associated with a bicarbonate species on the
surface. These signals very much coincide with literature-reported
spectra taken on pure monoclinic ZrO2.[11] However, in our case only very weak signals are observed,
which is essentially due to the strong dehydroxylation treatment,
conducted prior to the FT-IR measurements. Spectra shown in ref (11) (Figure 2 of that reference) clearly show peaks of surface hydroxyl
groups, which are almost absent in our case. The starting pressure
of 2 mbar at room temperature was enough to saturate the surface,
and thus any further increase of the CO2 pressure did not
influence the spectra. This corroborates the assumption that hydroxyl
groups are of crucial importance for the chemisorption of CO2. The following heating of ZrO2 in CO2 did
not lead to reliably interpretable spectra due to the low signal-to-noise
ratio.
Comparison of Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 upon CO2 Adsorption
All oxides were pretreated by heating in air up to 1173 K, which
leads to effective dehydroxylation of the surface. Only in the case
of pure ZrO2, no rehydroxylation was observed, even in
the presence of water vapor at temperatures up to 873 K (see Figure
S2, Supporting Information, also showing
a comparison of the three oxides upon H2O adsorption).
As a result, ZrO2 remains almost unreactive for CO2 adsorption. This emphasizes the fact that surface hydroxyl
species are important for effective chemisorption of CO2.The comparison of the three oxidesY2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 during exposure to CO2 at
room temperature and 873 K is highlighted in Figure 7 (concerning the assignment to (bi)carbonate species, see
Table 1).
Figure 7
Comparison of the collected
infrared spectra upon CO2 adsorption at room temperature
(lower panel) and 873 K (upper panel)
on the surfaces of the oxides Y2O3, YSZ-8, and
ZrO2.
Table 1
Observed Wave Numbers
and Assignment
of the Peaks to (Bi-)carbonate Species Following CO2 Adsorption
on Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2
oxide
carbonate species
νas(CO3) [cm–1]
νs(CO3) [cm–1]
δ(OH) [cm–1]
ν(OH) [cm–1]
Y2O3
monodentate
bicarbonate
1674
1397
1223
3658
bidentate bicarbonate
1652
1419
1223
3625
bridged carbonate
1585
1334
poly
dentate carbonate
1452
1388
YSZ-8
bidentate bicarbonate
1646
1429
1225
not
determined
bridged carbonate
not determined
1305
ZrO2
bicarbonate
1628
1431
1223
Comparison of the collected
infrared spectra upon CO2 adsorption at room temperature
(lower panel) and 873 K (upper panel)
on the surfaces of the oxidesY2O3, YSZ-8, and
ZrO2.At room temperature,
Y2O3 and YSZ-8 show
a very similar behavior (with the exception of a different distribution
of the (bi)carbonate species), suggesting that the hydroxylated yttrium
centers in YSZ-8 are the reactive sites of the mixed oxide. Upon heating
YSZ-8 to at least 673 K, the adsorbed carbonate species are completely
removed, indicating weaker bonding than on pure Y2O3, which is also reflected by the eventual absence of strongly
bound polydentate carbonate species. As a conclusion from measurements
on pure Y2O3, the monodentate bicarbonate must
be more strongly bound than the bidentate carbonate, and the conversion
to the associated bridged species—bound to two yttrium atoms—is
the essential step toward even more strongly bound species, which
are hard to remove. Most likely, the monodentate bicarbonate is not
only bound to an yttrium atom via one of its oxygen atoms but also
stabilized through a hydrogen bond with a neighboring hydroxyl group.
In contrast, YSZ-8 obviously does not exhibit these neighboring Y2O3 centers. If water binds dissociatively onto
a defect caused by a Y3+ in the ZrO2 lattice,
a HO– bound to the yttrium (because of its basicity)
is formed. This is the adsorption site for a CO2 molecule
to subsequently form a (bi-)carbonate species. In the case of a bridged
carbonate, this species is more likely bound to a yttrium and a zirconium
atom than to two adjacent Y3+ centers, and this seems to
make the difference in the binding strength of this particular species.
Comparing the carbonate spectra provided by Pokrovski et al.[12] and Baeza et al.[11] obtained on different hydroxylated ZrO2 polymorphs, we
note remarkable similarities in the overall features of the carbonate
regions but a slightly different population of the different (bi)carbonate
species. On pure Y2O3, the bicarbonate species
are dominating, whereas on YSZ-8, the relative fraction of bidentate
and bridged carbonate species is higher. In close correlation, the
spectra of Pokrovski et al. show a higher fraction of bridged species.
Most important, the spectra obtained on tetragonal ZrO2 are strikingly different from those observed on YSZ-8. The main
species on tetragonal ZrO2, as reported by Baeza et al.[11] and Pokrovski et al.,[12] are polydentate carbonate species already after adsorption at room
temperature (cf. Figure 3 of ref (12)). However, despite the
different distribution of bicarbonate, bidentate, and bridged carbonates,
no polydentate carbonates are found on YSZ-8, further confirming that
the adsorption of YSZ is basically dominated by the hydroxylated Y
centers.
CO Adsorption
Besides molecular adsorption
as “intact” CO, for the adsorption of a CO molecule
and following reaction to CO2 on an oxide surface, two
mechanisms are in principle possible:[14,21] (i) the CO
molecule reacts with an oxygen atom of the lattice to form CO2 and leaves an oxygen vacancy behind or (ii) it inserts into
a surface hydroxyl group, forms a formate, and this intermediate subsequently
decomposes into CO2 (or reacts backward to CO and OH).
Figure S3 (Supporting Information) shows
the possible formate species on an oxide surface.Figure 8 shows
Y2O3 heated in 290
mbar CO under static measurement conditions (main panel).
Figure 8
Infrared spectra
taken upon heating Y2O3 in
290 mbar CO under static measurement conditions up to 773 K (upper
panel) and with details of the wavenumber region above 2700 cm–1 (right lower panel) and below 1700 cm–1 (left lower panel).
Infrared spectra
taken upon heating Y2O3 in
290 mbar CO under static measurement conditions up to 773 K (upper
panel) and with details of the wavenumber region above 2700 cm–1 (right lower panel) and below 1700 cm–1 (left lower panel).At room temperature, no adsorption or reaction takes place,
but
during heating, CO2 formation starts at 373 K. As an intermediate
of this reaction, signals of formates can be detected, with an intensity
maximum reached at 573 K. The corresponding vibrations for the νas and the νs mode of the formate are at 1595
and 1381 cm–1, and the related ν(CH) vibration
is located at 2856 cm–1. Also the decrease of surface
hydroxyl groups (left lower panel) can be detected starting from a
temperature of 373 K at 3704 and 3672 cm–1, which
illustrates the analogy to the above-mentioned observations regarding
CO2 adsorption/carbonate formation. Above a temperature
of 573 K the formates are rapidly decomposed. Because of the formation
of CO2, vibration modes for carbonates are observed as
well—especially in analogy to the measurements in CO2 at 473 K the bridged carbonate is the main species. At 773 K the
polydentate carbonate is again predominant (right lower panel). Accompanied
by the already mentioned formate signals, combination modes, namely,
ν1(combi) (νas(CO2 +
δ(CH)) at 2972 cm–1 and ν2(combi) (νs(CO2) + δ(CH)) at 2727 cm–1, are observed (lower left panel).[18,21] On the basis of refs (18 and 21) the observed formate species are assigned to a bidentate or bridged
species.Starting from room temperature, weak signals are observed
at 1630
and 1294 cm–1, which may be arising from monodentateformate species. Comparing our results to those of the literature,[19−21] it is generally assumed that the monodentate species is the more
reactive and less stable one. Therefore, the bidentate or bridged
formate species could be mainly a spectator below 773 K.Figure 9 shows YSZ-8 heated
in flowing CO (CO flow = 0.2 mL s–1).
Figure 9
Infrared spectra
collected upon heating YSZ-8 in flowing CO (CO
flow = 0.2 mL s–1) up to 873 K. Infrared spectra
have been taken in 100 K steps.
Infrared spectra
collected upon heating YSZ-8 in flowing CO (CO
flow = 0.2 mL s–1) up to 873 K. Infrared spectra
have been taken in 100 K steps.As for CO2, flowing conditions were chosen for
YSZ-8
because of better interpretable spectra due to increased adsorption
of surface species. At room temperature, no signals of any adsorbed
molecules are detected. However, the processes on YSZ-8 are again
quite similar to those observed on Y2O3, with
the exception that the spectra are more easy to interpret because
of no disturbing (bi)carbonates. CO2 formation starts at
573 K, and in-parallel typical formate peaks at 2875 cm–1 for the ν(CH) mode and 1581, 1384, and 1357 cm–1 representing the νas(OCO), the δ(CH), and
the νas(OCO) mode of the formate arise. The combination
modes are less pronounced as compared to Y2O3. These formate vibration modes are visible up to a temperature of
675 K, and above 773 K the same spectra fingerprint as for CO2 adsorption is observed. In other words, no adsorbates are
detected anymore. During heating, also a decrease of signals at 3690,
3643, and 3613 cm–1, attributed to surface hydroxyl
groups, occurs. Interestingly, on YSZ-8 no signals for monodentateformate species are visible.To ensure full
correlation with the CO2 measurements, static conditions
are again chosen. Also by analogy to CO2 adsorption, pure
dehydroxylated ZrO2 did not show significant signals attributable
to surface adsorbates in static CO (Figure 10).
Figure 10
Infrared spectra collected upon heating ZrO2 following
static adsorption of 248 mbar CO up to 873 K. Infrared spectra have
been taken in 100 K steps.
Infrared spectra collected upon heating ZrO2 following
static adsorption of 248 mbar CO up to 873 K. Infrared spectra have
been taken in 100 K steps.This essentially verifies that no defects (which are usually
titrated
by molecular CO adsorption[7]) and no substantial
amount of hydroxyl groups are present because of the oxidizing high-temperature
pretreatment of the sample. However, during heating in 248 mbar CO
at 573 K, very weak peaks at 2361 and 2875 cm–1 being
attributable to ν(CH) and/or combination modes of formates are
observed (see left inset). The associated broad signals in the region
below 1600 cm–1 are too weak for an appropriate
interpretation. We note that all oxides were pretreated by heating
up to 1173 K in air to reduce impurities, and in the case of ZrO2 no rehydroxylation takes place. Because of the lack of surface
hydroxyl groups only a minute amount of formates can in turn be formed.
Comparison of Y2O3, YSZ-8,
and ZrO2 Regarding CO Adsorption
The
comparison of the adsorption behavior during exposure to CO at maximum
formate signal, namely, at 573 K, is highlighted in Figure 11.
Figure 11
Comparison of the infrared spectra of the oxides Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 at maximum formate
signal (573
K).
Comparison of the infrared spectra of the oxidesY2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 at maximum formate
signal (573
K).On none of the three studied oxides
were signals of adsorbed (physisorbed)
CO detected, as was previously shown for more defective ZrO2 samples.[10] We might anticipate that all
defects are therefore quenched upon the preannealing in oxygen to
1173 K. Note that our results strongly suggest that in line with the
initial question about the mechanism of CO2 formation following
CO adsorption a mechanism including the participation of surface OH-groups
is found to be most likely prevailing (mechanism ii). Substantial
reduction of the oxides is therefore less likely, and this assumption
is also corroborated by additional electric impedance measurements,
which only show the reversible formation of thermally excited charge
carriers but no substantial formation of surface defects (Figure S4, Supporting Information).Table 2 summarizes the main formate vibration
modes observed on all oxides.
Table 2
Observed Wave Numbers
and Assignment
of the Peaks to Formate Species Following CO Adsorption of Y2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2
oxide
νas [cm–1]
νs [cm–1]
ν(CH) [cm–1]
Y2O3
1595
1381
2856
YSZ-8
1581
1357
2875
ZrO2
not determined
not determined
2875
Like in the case of CO2 adsorption,
the comparison of
the oxides shows that the yttrium amount in YSZ-8 is important for
chemisorption reactivity because in contrast to pure ZrO2 the surface of the mixed oxide can be easily reactivated after dehydroxylation.
This again corroborates the assumption that the basic surface hydroxyl
species on Y-centers are also important for the conversion of CO toward
formates. On YSZ-8, the carbonates—resulting from adsorption
of the formed CO2—are not bound as strongly as on
Y2O3 and thus do not interfere with the formates.
Conclusion
Using FT-IR spectroscopy
investigations, surface reaction-induced
adsorbates of CO2 and CO on the technically relevant oxidesY2O3, YSZ-8, and ZrO2 could be identified.
Y2O3 and YSZ-8 show much higher reactivity toward
both CO2 and CO adsorption than ZrO2. The reversible
formation and basic presence of surface hydroxyl groups is a crucial
factor of an active surface, and the yttrium centers in YSZ-8 seem
to essentially exhibit this quality. Thus, they are the C1-reactive
sites of the mixed oxideYSZ-8. On Y2O3 and
YSZ-8, several kinds of carbonates are detected, whereby in general
on Y2O3 the adsorbates are more difficult to
remove because of obviously easier conversion to more strongly bound,
higher-coordinated species. The mechanism of chemisorption of CO2 most likely proceeds via an insertion of the CO2 molecule into a surface hydroxyl group and the following formation
of a bicarbonate. Further conversion into more strongly bound carbonate
species is observed at higher temperatures. In the case of CO oxidation
the formation of formate intermediates is observed on all oxides,
but the absence of a significant amount of hydroxyl groups on ZrO2 leads to very weak signals on this oxide. The present FT-IR
spectroscopic study moreover suggests that SOFC-related C1 reactions
(water–gas shift reaction, intermediates of CH4 reforming)
on YSZ-based cermet anodes may be mechanistically/kinetically influenced
by the basic character and by the pronounced reversibility and degree
of hydroxylation of the Y-centers in YSZ-8.
Authors: Michaela Kogler; Eva-Maria Köck; Bernhard Klötzer; Thomas Schachinger; Wolfgang Wallisch; Raphael Henn; Christian W Huck; Clivia Hejny; Simon Penner Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2016-01-07 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Kyriaki Polychronopoulou; Sara AlKhoori; Shaima AlBedwawi; Seba Alareeqi; Aseel G S Hussien; Michalis A Vasiliades; Angelos M Efstathiou; Klito C Petallidou; Nirpendra Singh; Dalaver H Anjum; Lourdes F Vega; Mark A Baker Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 10.383
Authors: Giulia E M Schukraft; Ioanna Itskou; Robert T Woodward; Bart Van Der Linden; Camille Petit; Atsushi Urakawa Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Nina V Vlasenko; Pavlo I Kyriienko; Karina V Valihura; Gulnara R Kosmambetova; Sergii O Soloviev; Peter E Strizhak Journal: ACS Omega Date: 2019-12-04