Literature DB >> 31867074

Prognostic Value of Metabolic Information in Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Hye Ryeong Kwon1, Kisoo Pahk1, Sungsoo Park2, Hyun Woo Kwon1, Sungeun Kim1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the usefulness of semiquantitative and volumetric PET parameters for predicting prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).
METHODS: We enrolled 213 patients who underwent 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) prior to curative surgery for AGC. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-liver uptake ratio (TLR) were measured in all patients. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis were measured in volume-measurable patients. For further quantification of FDG uptake, we developed PET prognostic scores by combining SUVmax and MTV (1: low SUVmax/low MTV; 2: high SUVmax/low MTV; 3: high SUVmax/high MTV). Comparison of PET parameters between recurrence and non-recurrence groups was performed. Univariate and multivariate analyses for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were subsequently performed.
RESULTS: The recurrence rate was 32.4% (69/213 patients). Mean SUVmax and mean MTV of the recurrence group were significantly higher than those of the non-recurrence group (p = 0.026 and p = 0.025). TLR showed marginal significance (p = 0.051). In multivariate analysis for RFS including all patients, SUVmax (p = 0.022), TLR (p = 0.010), and PET score (p = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors. In post hoc analysis of PET score, significant differences in RFS were observed between PET scores 2 and 3 as well as scores 1 and 3. No significant difference in RFS was observed between scores 1 and 2. Only PET score was statistically significant for OS in univariate analysis. None of the PET parameters were statistically significant for OS in multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSION: High SUVmax and high MTV of the primary tumor suggest a high risk of recurrence for AGC patients. Even if SUVmax is similar, the prognosis may vary depending on MTV. Combining PET parameters results in a better prediction for prognosis. © Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced gastric cancer; FDG PET/CT; Maximum standardized uptake value; Metabolic tumor volume; Recurrence

Year:  2019        PMID: 31867074      PMCID: PMC6898707          DOI: 10.1007/s13139-019-00622-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1869-3474


  32 in total

1.  Focal F-18 FDG uptake mimicking malignant gastric localizations disappearing after water ingestion on PET/CT images.

Authors:  Alessio Imperiale; Sébastien Cimarelli; Dorra Ben Sellem; Cyrille Blondet; André Contantinesco
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.794

Review 2.  Gastric cancer: descriptive epidemiology, risk factors, screening, and prevention.

Authors:  Parisa Karimi; Farhad Islami; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Neal D Freedman; Farin Kamangar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Pretreatment F-18 FDG PET/CT Parameters to Evaluate Progression-Free Survival in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jeonghun Kim; Seok Tae Lim; Chang Ju Na; Yeon-Hee Han; Chan-Young Kim; Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Myung-Hee Sohn
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-28

4.  Variable 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in gastric cancer is associated with different levels of GLUT-1 expression.

Authors:  Hakan Alakus; Mert Batur; Matthias Schmidt; Uta Drebber; Stephan E Baldus; Daniel Vallböhmer; Klaus L Prenzel; Ralf Metzger; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher; Stefan P Mönig
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.690

5.  Predictive value of pretreatment metabolic activity measured by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic advanced gastric cancer: the maximal SUV of the stomach is a prognostic factor.

Authors:  Jun Chul Park; Jae-Hoon Lee; Kungseok Cheoi; Hyunsoo Chung; Mi Jin Yun; Hyuk Lee; Sung Kwan Shin; Sang Kil Lee; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  High FDG uptake in PET/CT predicts worse prognosis in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Chung; Eun Jeong Lee; Yo-Han Cho; So Young Yoon; Young So; Sung-Yong Kim; Mark Hong Lee; Jeong Hwan Kim; Sun-Young Lee; In-Kyung Sung; Hyung-Seok Park; Moon-Won Yoo; Kyung-Yung Lee
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Harry Agress; Stanley J Goldsmith
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Metabolic information on staging FDG-PET-CT as a prognostic tool in the evaluation of 97 patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas A Coupe; Deme Karikios; Shanley Chong; June Yap; Weng Ng; Neil Merrett; Michael Lin
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.668

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2015.

Authors:  Kyu-Won Jung; Young-Joo Won; Hyun-Joo Kong; Eun Sook Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.679

View more
  3 in total

1.  Prediction value of 18F-FDG PET/CT intratumor metabolic heterogeneity parameters for recurrence after radical surgery of stage II/III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Yi-Fan Zhang; Qin Shi; Yi Yang; Ben-Hu Yao; Shi-Cun Wang; Guang-Yong Geng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  A case of an intramesenteric GIST accurately diagnosed and completely resected by PET-CT and laparoscopy after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Manabu Sato; Masayuki Sato; Tadaaki Yokoyama; Akiko Kusaka; Yukie Suzuki; Kenji Fukuhara
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  Differences among [18F]FDG PET-derived parameters in lung cancer produced by three software packages.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bos-Liedke; Paulina Cegla; Krzysztof Matuszewski; Ewelina Konstanty; Adam Piotrowski; Magdalena Gross; Julian Malicki; Maciej Kozak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.