Literature DB >> 31865491

The lipidome of endometrial fluid differs between implantative and non-implantative IVF cycles.

Roberto Matorras1,2, Ibon Martinez-Arranz3, Enara Arretxe3, Marta Iruarrizaga-Lejarreta3, Blanca Corral4, Jone Ibañez-Perez4, Antonia Exposito4, Begoña Prieto4,5, Felix Elortza6, Cristina Alonso3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the most relevant changes in the lipidome of endometrial fluid aspirate (EFA) in non-implantative cycles.
DESIGN: Lipidomics in a prospective cohort study. SETTINGS: Reproductive unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine women undergoing an IVF cycle. Fifteen achieved pregnancy and 14 did not. INTERVENTION: Endometrial fluid aspiration immediately before performing embryo transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical pregnancy rate and lipidomic profiles obtained on an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled to time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ToF-MS)-based analytical platform.
RESULTS: The comparative analysis of the lipidomic patterns of endometrial fluid in implantative and non-implantative IVF cycles revealed eight altered metabolites: seven glycerophospholipids and an omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid. Then, women with a non-implantative cycle were accurately classified with a support vector machine algorithm including these eight lipid metabolites. The diagnostic performances of the algorithm showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 0.893 ± 0.07, 85.7%, 80.0%, and 82.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A predictive lipidomic signature linked to the implantative status of the endometrial fluid has been found.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproduction; Endometrial fluid; Implantation; In vitro fertilization; Lipidomics; Machine learning algorithms; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31865491      PMCID: PMC7056765          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01670-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  41 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers.

Authors:  R Matorras; E Urquijo; R Mendoza; B Corcóstegui; A Expósito; F J Rodríguez-Escudero
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 2.  Insights into human endometrial receptivity from transcriptomic and proteomic data.

Authors:  Delphine Haouzi; Hervé Dechaud; Said Assou; John De Vos; Samir Hamamah
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 3.  Assessing receptivity in the endometrium: the need for a rapid, non-invasive test.

Authors:  Tracey A Edgell; Luk J F Rombauts; Lois A Salamonsen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up.

Authors:  Efstratios Kolibianakis; Claire Bourgain; Carola Albano; Kaan Osmanagaoglu; Johan Smitz; Andre Van Steirteghem; Paul Devroey
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Lipidomics as an emerging tool to predict endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Felipe Vilella; Leslie B Ramirez; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Premature formation of nucleolar channel systems indicates advanced endometrial maturation following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

Authors:  G Zapantis; M J Szmyga; E A Rybak; U T Meier
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Endometrial secretion aspiration prior to embryo transfer does not reduce implantation rates.

Authors:  M H van der Gaast; K Beier-Hellwig; B C J M Fauser; H M Beier; N S Macklon
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Proteomic pattern of implantative human endometrial fluid in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Roberto Matorras; Sara Quevedo; Blanca Corral; Begoña Prieto; Antonia Exposito; Rosario Mendoza; Aintzane Rabanal; María Diaz-Nuñez; Marcos Ferrando; Felix Elortza; Amagoia Ametzazurra; Daniel Nagore
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Differential proteomic analysis of endometrial fluid suggests increased inflammation and impaired glucose metabolism in non-implantative IVF cycles and pinpoints PYGB as a putative implantation marker.

Authors:  Mikel Azkargorta; Iraide Escobes; Ibon Iloro; Nerea Osinalde; Blanca Corral; Jone Ibañez-Perez; Antonia Exposito; Begoña Prieto; Felix Elortza; Roberto Matorras
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Hormonal and embryonic regulation of chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR4, CCR5 and CCR2B in the human endometrium and the human blastocyst.

Authors:  Francisco Dominguez; Arancha Galan; Jose Juan Luna Martin; Jose Remohi; Antonio Pellicer; Carlos Simón
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  2 in total

1.  microRNA-based signatures obtained from endometrial fluid identify implantative endometrium.

Authors:  Jone Ibañez-Perez; María Díaz-Nuñez; Marc Clos-García; Lucía Lainz; María Iglesias; Miren Díez-Zapirain; Aintzane Rabanal; Laura Bárcena; Monika González; Juan J Lozano; Urko M Marigorta; Esperanza González; Félix Royo; Ana M Aransay; Nerea Subiran; Roberto Matorras; Juan Manuel Falcón-Pérez
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.353

2.  GLUT4 in Mouse Endometrial Epithelium: Roles in Embryonic Development and Implantation.

Authors:  Yun Long; Yi-Cheng Wang; Dong-Zhi Yuan; Xin-Hua Dai; Lin-Chuan Liao; Xue-Qin Zhang; Li-Xue Zhang; Yong-Dan Ma; Yi Lei; Zhi-Hui Cui; Jin-Hu Zhang; Li Nie; Li-Min Yue
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.566

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.