Literature DB >> 17013735

Prediction of acetabular development after closed reduction by overhead traction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Hiroshi Kitoh1, Takahiko Kitakoji, Mitsuyasu Katoh, Naoki Ishiguro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prediction of acetabular development after reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is important to ensure optimal timing of acetabuloplasty and to avoid unnecessary surgery. The objective of this study was to find early and reliable predictors of future acetabular dysplasia in the hips reduced by overhead traction (OHT).
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 45 hips in 40 patients treated by OHT for DDH without additional procedures. The average age at the time of closed reduction was 9.3 months, and the average age at the latest examination was 17.3 years. Residual hip dysplasia at skeletal maturity was defined according to Severin's classification. The following variables were evaluated as possible predictors of the final outcome: age at reduction, severity of the dislocation, serial measurements of acetabular index (AI), center-edge angle of Wiberg (CE), and the center-head discrepancy distance (CHDD).
RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of the hips had satisfactory results in Severin I/II and 38% had unsatisfactory results in Severin III. Bilateral DDH showed significantly poorer outcome than unilateral DDH. The average AI of the unsatisfactory group was significantly greater than that of the satisfactory group at 4 years or more after reduction. Similarly, the average CE of the satisfactory group was greater than that of the unsatisfactory group at 5 years or more after reduction. In unilateral cases, the AI and the CE of the uninvolved hip at 1 year after reduction also correlated with the final outcome of the involved hip.
CONCLUSIONS: The AI of 4 years and the CE of 5 years after reduction were the earliest predictors of the final outcome. Careful consideration for the need of acetabuloplasty would be given at 4 or 5 years after reduction by OHT. Bilateral DDH and poor acetabular coverage of the uninvolved hip in unilateral DDH were the prognostic factors of unfavorable acetabular development of the dislocated hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17013735     DOI: 10.1007/s00776-006-1049-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sci        ISSN: 0949-2658            Impact factor:   1.601


  12 in total

1.  Acetabular index is the best predictor of late residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  YiQiang Li; YueMing Guo; Ming Li; QingHe Zhou; Yuanzhong Liu; WeiDong Chen; JingChun Li; Federico Canavese; HongWen Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  DDH in the Walking Age: Review of Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Giovanni Lucchesi; Riccardo Sacco; Weizheng Zhou; YiQiang Li; Lianyong Li; Federico Canavese
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Closed reduction and dynamic cast immobilization in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip between 6 and 24 months of age.

Authors:  YiQiang Li; QingHe Zhou; Yuanzhong Liu; WeiDong Chen; JingChun Li; Federico Canavese; HongWen Xu
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-08-03

4.  Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) between the age of 18 and 24 months.

Authors:  Nabil Alassaf
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-21

5.  Comparison of Open Reduction Alone and Open Reduction Plus Pemberton Osteotomy Techniques in the Treatment of Developmental Hip Dysplasia at Walking Age.

Authors:  Sinan Yilar; Serdar Toy; Mehmet Kose; Kutsi Tuncer; Naci Ezirmik; Ali Aydın; Kamber Kasali
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2019-10

6.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip - angle trends after operation in different age groups.

Authors:  Sonja Milasinovic; Radivoj Brdar; Ivana Petronic; Dejan Nikolic; Dragana Cirovic
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.318

7.  Relationship between developmental dislocation of the hip in infant and acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity.

Authors:  Kunihiko Okano; Kazumasa Yamaguchi; Yoshikazu Ninomiya; Shohei Matsubayashi; Kiyoshi Aoyagi; Makoto Osaki; Hiroshi Enomoto; Katsuro Takahashi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the labrum to predict acetabular development in developmental dysplasia of the hip: A STROBE compliant study.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Shirai; Kenjiro Wakabayashi; Ikuo Wada; Yoshiaki Tsuboi; Myongsu Ha; Takanobu Otsuka
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Acetabular Remodeling after Closed Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Hayazi M Al Shehri; Asim A Mahmoud; Saleh A Ateeq; Amal H Alamrani
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-14

10.  Does Adductor Tenotomy Need During Closed Reduction Have a Prognostic Value in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Between 6 and 12 Months of Age? "Adductor Tenotomy in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia''.

Authors:  Hanifi Ucpunar; Muhammed Mert; Yalkin Camurcu; Hakan Sofu; Timur Yildirim; Avni Ilhan Bayhan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.