Lucie Derycke1, Jean Sénémaud2, David Perrin3, Stephane Avril4, Pascal Desgranges2, Jean-Noel Albertini5, Frederic Cochennec2, Stephan Haulon6. 1. Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, Univ Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, F - 42023 Saint-Etienne, France; Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris XII, Créteil, France. Electronic address: deryckelucie@gmail.com. 2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris XII, Créteil, France. 3. PrediSurge, 3, Saint-Etienne, France. 4. Mines Saint-Etienne, Univ Lyon, Univ Jean Monnet, INSERM, U 1059 Sainbiose, Centre CIS, F - 42023 Saint-Etienne, France. 5. Department of Cardio-Vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Priez-en-Jarez, France. 6. Department of Aortic and Vascular Surgery, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis-Robinson, INSERM UMR_S 999, Université Paris Sud, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to validate a computational patient specific model of Zenith® fenestrated device deployment in abdominal aortic aneurysms to predict fenestration positions. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the accuracy of numerical simulation for fenestrated stent graft sizing. Finite element computational simulation was performed in 51 consecutive patients that underwent successful endovascular repair with Zenith® fenestrated stent grafts in two vascular surgery units with a high volume of aortic procedures. Longitudinal and rotational clock positions of fenestrations were measured on the simulated models. These measurements were compared with those obtained by (i) an independent observer on the post-operative computed tomography (CT) scan and (ii) by the stent graft manufacturer planning team on the pre-operative CT scan. (iii) Pre- and post-operative positions were also compared. Longitudinal distance and clock face discrepancies >3 mm and 15°, respectively, were considered significant. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 195 target arteries were analysed. Both Bland-Altman and linear regression showed good reproducibility between the three measurement techniques performed. The median absolute difference between the simulation and post-operative CT scan was 1.0 ± 1.1 mm for longitudinal distance measurements and 6.9 ± 6.1° for clock positions. The median absolute difference between the planning centre and post-operative CT scan was 0.8 ± 0.8 mm for longitudinal distance measurements and 5.1 ± 5.0° for clock positions. Finally, the median absolute difference between the simulation and the planning centre was 0.96 ± 0.97 mm for longitudinal distance measurements and 4.8 ± 3.6° for clock positions. CONCLUSION: The numerical model of deployed fenestrated stent grafts is accurate for planning position of fenestrations. It has been validated in 51 patients, for whom fenestration locations were similar to the sizing performed by physicians and the planning centre.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to validate a computational patient specific model of Zenith® fenestrated device deployment in abdominal aortic aneurysms to predict fenestration positions. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the accuracy of numerical simulation for fenestrated stent graft sizing. Finite element computational simulation was performed in 51 consecutive patients that underwent successful endovascular repair with Zenith® fenestrated stent grafts in two vascular surgery units with a high volume of aortic procedures. Longitudinal and rotational clock positions of fenestrations were measured on the simulated models. These measurements were compared with those obtained by (i) an independent observer on the post-operative computed tomography (CT) scan and (ii) by the stent graft manufacturer planning team on the pre-operative CT scan. (iii) Pre- and post-operative positions were also compared. Longitudinal distance and clock face discrepancies >3 mm and 15°, respectively, were considered significant. Reproducibility was assessed using Bland-Altman and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 195 target arteries were analysed. Both Bland-Altman and linear regression showed good reproducibility between the three measurement techniques performed. The median absolute difference between the simulation and post-operative CT scan was 1.0 ± 1.1 mm for longitudinal distance measurements and 6.9 ± 6.1° for clock positions. The median absolute difference between the planning centre and post-operative CT scan was 0.8 ± 0.8 mm for longitudinal distance measurements and 5.1 ± 5.0° for clock positions. Finally, the median absolute difference between the simulation and the planning centre was 0.96 ± 0.97 mm for longitudinal distance measurements and 4.8 ± 3.6° for clock positions. CONCLUSION: The numerical model of deployed fenestrated stent grafts is accurate for planning position of fenestrations. It has been validated in 51 patients, for whom fenestration locations were similar to the sizing performed by physicians and the planning centre.
Authors: Willemina A van Veldhuizen; Richte C L Schuurmann; Frank F A IJpma; Rogier H J Kropman; George A Antoniou; Jelmer M Wolterink; Jean-Paul P M de Vries Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 4.241