| Literature DB >> 31864359 |
Amin Asadollahi1, Mehdi Khoobdel2, Alireza Zahraei-Ramazani3, Sahar Azarmi1, Sayed Hussain Mosawi4.
Abstract
Plant-based repellents have been applied for generations in traditional practice as a personal protection approach against different species of Anopheles. Knowledge of traditional repellent plants is a significant resource for the development of new natural products as an alternative to chemical repellents. Many studies have reported evidence of repellant activities of plant extracts or essential oils against malaria vectors worldwide. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of plant-based repellents against Anopheles mosquitoes. All eligible studies on the repellency effects of plants against Anopheles mosquitoes published up to July 2018 were systematically searched through PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Google scholar databases. Outcomes measures were percentage repellency and protection time. A total of 62 trials met the inclusion criteria. The highest repellency effect was identified from Ligusticum sinense extract, followed by citronella, pine, Dalbergia sissoo, peppermint and Rhizophora mucronata oils with complete protection time ranging from 9.1 to 11.5 h. Furthermore, essential oils from plants such as lavender, camphor, catnip, geranium, jasmine, broad-leaved eucalyptus, lemongrass, lemon-scented eucalyptus, amyris, narrow-leaved eucalyptus, carotin, cedarwood, chamomile, cinnamon oil, juniper, cajeput, soya bean, rosemary, niaouli, olive, tagetes, violet, sandalwood, litsea, galbanum, and Curcuma longa also showed good repellency with 8 h complete repellency against different species of Anopheles. Essential oils and extracts of some plants could be formulated for the development of eco-friendly repellents against Anopheles species. Plant oils may serve as suitable alternatives to synthetic repellents in the future as they are relatively safe, inexpensive, and are readily available in many parts of the world.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles; Herb; Plant; Repellency; Repellent; Systematic review
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31864359 PMCID: PMC6925501 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-3064-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Study selection process, up to July 2018
Characteristics of studies. Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review, up to July 2018
| Study | Year | Country | Study type | Plant extract/(essential oil) | Concentration dose | Repellency % | Protection time (hours) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ansari et al. | 2005 | India | Field | Pine oil ( | 1 ml without dilution | 100 | 11 | |
| Citronella (lemongrass oil) | 1 ml without dilution | 100 | 11 | |||||
| Ansari et al. | 2000 | India | Field | 1 ml without dilution | 96.1 | 10.3 | ||
| 1 ml without dilution | 100 | 11 | ||||||
| 1 ml without dilution | 89.7 | 8 | ||||||
| Ansari et al. | 2000 | India | Field | Peppermint oil | 1 ml without dilution | 92.3 | 9.6 | |
| Peppermint oil | 1 ml without dilution | 100 | 11 | |||||
| Peppermint oil | 1 ml without dilution | 83.1 | 7.3 | |||||
| Amer et al. | 2006 | Germany | Laboratory | Citronella ( | 20% oil solutions | 52.4 | 8 | |
| Rosewood ( | 20% oil solutions | 4.8 | 6.5 | |||||
| Lavender ( | 20% oil solutions | 80.9 | 8 | |||||
| Camphor ( | 20% oil solutions | 42.8 | 8 | |||||
| Catnip ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Geranium ( | 20% oil solutions | 61.9 | 8 | |||||
| Thyme ( | 20% oil solutions | 33.3 | 7.5 | |||||
| Eucalyptus ( | 20% oil solutions | 28.6 | 5.5 | |||||
| Jasmine ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Broad-leaved eucalyptus ( | 20% oil solutions | 38.1 | 8 | |||||
| Lemongrass ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Lemon-scented eucalyptus ( | 20% oil solutions | 52.4 | 8 | |||||
| Fichtennadel ( | 20% oil solutions | 19 | 3 | |||||
| Amyris ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Lemon ( | 20% oil solutions | 9.5 | 7 | |||||
| Narrow-leaved eucalyptus ( | 20% oil solutions | 42.8 | 8 | |||||
| Carotin oil ( | 20% oil solutions | 9.5 | 8 | |||||
| Cedarwood ( | 20% oil solutions | 38.1 | 8 | |||||
| frankincense ( | 20% oil solutions | 19 | 5 | |||||
| Dill ( | 20% oil solutions | 71.4 | 3.5 | |||||
| Myrtle ( | 20% oil solutions | 42.8 | 6.5 | |||||
| Chamomile ( | 20% oil solutions | 76.2 | 8 | |||||
| Cinnamon ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Juniper ( | 20% oil solutions | 76.2 | 8 | |||||
| Sage ( | 20% oil solutions | 19 | 5 | |||||
| Peppermint ( | 20% oil solutions | 57.1 | 6.5 | |||||
| Basil ( | 20% oil solutions | 66.7 | 3.5 | |||||
| Cajeput ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Soya bean ( | 20% oil solutions | 76.2 | 8 | |||||
| Rosemary ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Niaouli ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Olive ( | 20% oil solutions | 71.4 | 8 | |||||
| Black pepper ( | 20% oil solutions | 61.9 | 3 | |||||
| Verbena ( | 20% oil solutions | 38.1 | 5.5 | |||||
| tagetes ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Violet ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Sandalwood ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Litsea ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| 20% oil solutions | 47.6 | 6 | ||||||
| Galbanum ( | 20% oil solutions | 100 | 8 | |||||
| Chamomile ( | 20% oil solutions | 47.6 | 5.5 | |||||
| Amerasan et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 2.5 mg/cm2 5.0 mg/cm2 | 100 100 100 | 2 2 2.5 | ||
| Abiy et al. | 2015 | Ethiopia | Field | 20% neem oil | Neem and chinaberry oils were diluted to 20% using Niger seed (noog abyssinia) oil | 71 | 3 | |
| 20% chinaberry oil | Neem and chinaberry oils were diluted to 20% using Niger seed (noog abyssinia) oil | 70 | 1 | |||||
| Alayo et al. | 2015 | Nigeria | Laboratory | Cream 0.5% w/w | 48 | – | ||
| Cream 1% w/w | 88 | – | ||||||
| Cream 2% w/w | 100 | 0.08 | ||||||
| Cream 4% w/w | 100 | 0.08 | ||||||
| Cream 6% w/w | 100 | 0.08 | ||||||
| Alwala et al. | 2010 | Kenya | Laboratory | 10% solution | 100 | – | ||
| Baskar et al. | 2018 | India | Laboratory | 50 ppm | – | 6.85 | ||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2010 | India | Laboratory | 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2011 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 2.5 mg/cm2 5 mg/cm2 | 100 100 100 | 2.5 3 3.5 | ||
| 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2011 | India | Laboratory | 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||
2.5 mg/cm2 5 mg/cm2 | 100 100 | 2 2.5 | ||||||
| 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1 | ||||||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1.5 | ||||||
| 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1 | ||||||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1.5 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1 | ||||||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1.5 | ||||||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2016 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||
| 2 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| Jeyabalan et al. | 2003 | India | Laboratory | 0.5% | 36 | – | ||
| 1% | 51 | – | ||||||
| 2% | 78 | – | ||||||
| 4% | 100 | – | ||||||
| Karunamoorthi et al. | 2008 | Ethiopia | Laboratory | Woira ( | Burning of 25 g of dried plant materials | 79.7 | – | |
| Tinjut ( | Burning of 25 g of dried plant materials | 90.1 | – | |||||
| Wogert ( | Burning of 25 g of dried plant materials | 93.6 | – | |||||
| Kebercho ( | Burning of 25 g of dried plant materials | 92.4 | – | |||||
| Karunamoorthi et al. | 2010 | Ethiopia | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3.2 | ||
| 1.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 4.4 | ||||||
| 2 mg/cm2 | 100 | 5.3 | ||||||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 6.3 | ||||||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2016 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||
| 2 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3.5 | ||||||
| Haldar et al. | 2014 | India | Laboratory | 30 mg/l smoked | 18 | 0.16 | ||
| 60 mg/l smoked | 100 | 0.5 | ||||||
| 90 mg/l smoked | 100 | 1 | ||||||
| Auysawasdi et al. | 2015 | Thailand | Laboratory | 5% | 100 | 4 | ||
| 10% | 100 | 5 | ||||||
| 15% | 100 | 5.5 | ||||||
| 20% | 100 | 5.5 | ||||||
| 25% | 100 | 8 | ||||||
| 5% | 100 | 1.7 | ||||||
| 10% | 100 | 2.3 | ||||||
| 15% | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| 20% | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| 25% | 100 | 3.4 | ||||||
| 5% | 100 | 1.8 | ||||||
| 10% | 100 | 2.9 | ||||||
| 15% | 100 | 2.9 | ||||||
| 20% | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| 25% | 100 | 3.5 | ||||||
| Barnard et al. | 1999 | USA | Laboratory | Clove essential oil | 25% | 100 | 1.25 | |
| 50% | 100 | 1.5 | ||||||
| 75% | 100 | 2.26 | ||||||
| 100% | 100 | 3.55 | ||||||
| Thyme essential oil | 25% | 100 | 0.75 | |||||
| 50% | 100 | 0.5 | ||||||
| 75% | 100 | 1 | ||||||
| 100% | 100 | 1.75 | ||||||
| Kweka et al. | 2008 | Tanzania | Laboratory | Citronella | 500 mg/m2 | 81 | – | |
| 500 mg/m2 | 81 | – | ||||||
| 500 mg/m2 | 73 | – | ||||||
| 500 mg/m2 | 85 | – | ||||||
| 500 mg/m2 | 89 | – | ||||||
| 500 mg/m2 | 75 | – | ||||||
| Kovendan et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||
| 3 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| Krishnappa et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | 2 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||
| 4 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3.5 | ||||||
| 6 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3.5 | ||||||
| Naine et al. | 2014 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||
| 3 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| 6 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| Murugan et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | Orange peel extract | 50 ppm | 99 | – | |
| 150 ppm | 100 | 0.5 | ||||||
| 250 ppm | 100 | 0.05 | ||||||
| 350 ppm | 100 | 1.5 | ||||||
| 450 ppm | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| Padilha et al. | 2003 | Brazil | Field | 10% v/v | 89 | 0.5 | ||
| Konan et al. | 2003 | Ivory Coast | Laboratory | Karite nut butter oil | 75% | 100 | 2 | |
| Palm oil | 75% | 100 | 1.38 | |||||
| Coconut oil | 75% | 100 | 0.76 | |||||
| Maheswaran et al. | 2013 | India | Laboratory | Confertifolin essential oil | 0.62 ppm | 100 | 1 | |
| 1.25 ppm | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| 2.5 ppm | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| 5 ppm | 100 | 5 | ||||||
| 10 ppm | 100 | 5.2 | ||||||
| Panneerselvam et al. | 2013 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||
| 3 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| 6 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| 3 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| 6 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| 3 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| 6 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| Panneerselvam et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | 50 ppm | 95 | 0.5 | ||
| 150 ppm | 98 | 0.5 | ||||||
| 250 ppm | 100 | 0.5 | ||||||
| 350 ppm | 100 | 1 | ||||||
| 450 ppm | 100 | 2 | ||||||
| Phasomkusolsil et al. | 2011 | Thailand | Laboratory | 0.02 mg/cm2 | 94 | – | ||
| 0.10 mg/cm2 | 92 | – | ||||||
| 0.21 mg/cm2 | 92 | – | ||||||
| 0.02 mg/cm2 | 40 | – | ||||||
| 0.10 mg/cm2 | 54 | – | ||||||
| 0.21 mg/cm2 | 84 | – | ||||||
| 0.02 mg/cm2 | 76 | – | ||||||
| 0.10 mg/cm2 | 82 | – | ||||||
| 0.21 mg/cm2 | 98 | – | ||||||
| 0.02 mg/cm2 | 92 | – | ||||||
| 0.10 mg/cm2 | 92 | – | ||||||
| 0.21 mg/cm2 | 98 | – | ||||||
| 0.02 mg/cm2 | 52 | – | ||||||
| 0.10 mg/cm2 | 74 | – | ||||||
| 0.21 mg/cm2 | 86 | – | ||||||
| 0.02 mg/cm2 | 66 | – | ||||||
| 0.10 mg/cm2 | 74 | – | ||||||
| 0.21 mg/cm2 | 96 | – | ||||||
| 0.02 mg/cm2 | 82 | – | ||||||
| 0.10 mg/cm2 | 92 | – | ||||||
| 0.21 mg/cm2 | 98 | – | ||||||
| Prabhu et al. | 2011 | India | Laboratory | 20% | 23 | – | ||
| 40% | 43 | – | ||||||
| 60% | 58 | – | ||||||
| 80% | 76 | – | ||||||
| 100% | 90 | – | ||||||
| Rajkumar et al. | 2007 | India | Laboratory | 2% | – | 1 | ||
| 4% | – | 1.78 | ||||||
| 6% | – | 2.33 | ||||||
| 2% | – | 2.63 | ||||||
| 4% | – | 4.13 | ||||||
| 6% | – | 5.53 | ||||||
| 2% | – | 2.38 | ||||||
| 4% | – | 3.93 | ||||||
| 6% | – | 5.38 | ||||||
| 2% | – | 0.93 | ||||||
| 4% | – | 1.48 | ||||||
| 6% | – | 1.98 | ||||||
| 2% | – | 2.33 | ||||||
| 4% | – | 3.78 | ||||||
| 6% | – | 5.28 | ||||||
| Rajkumar et al. | 2005 | India | Laboratory | 0.001% | 100 | 1.15 | ||
| 0.005% | 100 | 1.3 | ||||||
| 0.01% | 100 | 1.51 | ||||||
| 0.015% | 100 | 1.7 | ||||||
| 0.02% | 100 | 2.03 | ||||||
| Rawani et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | 1% | 65 | 2.3 | ||
| 1.50% | 80 | 4 | ||||||
| 2% | 90 | 5 | ||||||
| Reegan et al. | 2015 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1.08 | ||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1.71 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 1.21 | ||||||
| Swathi et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | 0.1% | – | 0.35 | ||
| 0.5% | – | 0.72 | ||||||
| 1% | – | 1.9 | ||||||
| Seyoum et al. | 2002 | Kenya | Semi-field | Neem ( | Periodic thermal expulsion | 24.5 | – | |
| Lemon eucalyptus ( | Periodic thermal expulsion | 74.5 | – | |||||
| Wild spikenard ( | Periodic thermal expulsion | -13.3 | – | |||||
| Lantana ( | Periodic thermal expulsion | 42.4 | – | |||||
| Fever tea ( | Periodic thermal expulsion | 45.9 | – | |||||
| Lime basil ( | Periodic thermal expulsion | 43.1 | – | |||||
| Rican blue basil ( | Periodic thermal expulsion | 52.0 | – | |||||
| Tree basil ( | Periodic thermal expulsion | 53.1 | – | |||||
| Khaki weed ( | Placing branches or whole plants inside houses | 54.8 | – | |||||
| Sanghong et al. | 2015 | Thailand | Laboratory | 25% | – | 11.5 | ||
| Das et al. | 2003 | India | Laboratory | 1 ml without dilution | 98 | 6 | ||
| Nour et al. | 2009 | Sudan | Laboratory | Basil ( | 0.1 ml | 100 | 1.5 | |
| Trongtokit et al. | 2005 | Thailand | Laboratory | 10% | – | 0.66 | ||
| 50% | – | 0.5 | ||||||
| 100% | – | 1.16 | ||||||
| 10% | – | 1.33 | ||||||
| 50% | – | 2 | ||||||
| 100% | – | 2.83 | ||||||
| Mullilam ( | 10% | – | 1 | |||||
| 50% | – | 2.16 | ||||||
| 100% | – | 3.16 | ||||||
| Clove ( | 10% | – | 1.33 | |||||
| 50% | – | 2.66 | ||||||
| 100% | – | 3.5 | ||||||
| Yogananth et al. | 2015 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 73 | 7.2 | ||
| 2 mg/cm2 | 86 | 7.8 | ||||||
| 3 mg/cm2 | 92 | 8.5 | ||||||
| 4 mg/cm2 | 97 | 9.1 | ||||||
| Tawatsin et al. | 2000 | Thailand | Laboratory | Turmeric ( | 3 ml | 100 | 6 | |
| Citronella | 3 ml | 100 | 6 | |||||
| Hairy basil oil | 3 ml | 100 | 6 | |||||
| Singh et al. | 2005 | India | Laboratory | 2.50% | 95 | – | ||
| 5% | 99 | – | ||||||
| 10% | 100 | 6 | ||||||
| Mayeku et al. | 2013 | Kenya | laboratory | 0.01 g/ml | 38 | – | ||
| 0.1 g/ml | 68 | – | ||||||
| 1 g/ml | 100 | – | ||||||
| Phasomkusolsil et al. | 2009 | Thailand | Laboratory | Phlai ( | 100 μl | – | 2 | |
| Turmeric ( | 100 μl | – | 1 | |||||
| Mah-Khwuaen ( | 100 μl | – | 0.66 | |||||
| Citronella grass ( | 100 μl | – | 2.16 | |||||
| Orange oil ( | 100 μl | – | 0.83 | |||||
| Eucalyptus ( | 100 μl | – | 0.5 | |||||
| Clove ( | 100 μl | – | 2 | |||||
| Trongtokit et al. | 2004 | Thailand | Laboratory | Clove oil | 20% gel | – | 4.5 | |
| cream 20% | – | 4.8 | ||||||
| Birkett et al. | 2011 | Kenya | Laboratory | 0.01 mg | 17 | – | ||
| 0.1 mg | 97 | – | ||||||
| 1 mg | 100 | – | ||||||
| Kamaraj et al. | 2011 | India | Laboratory | 500 ppm | 21 | – | ||
| Solomon et al. | 2012 | Ethiopia | Laboratory | Citronella extract | 20% | 73 | – | |
| Soonwera et al. | 2015 | Thailand | Laboratory | 1% | 92 | – | ||
| 5% | 92 | – | ||||||
| 10% | 94 | – | ||||||
| Sritabutra et al. | 2011 | Thailand | Laboratory | Eucalyptus ( | 0.1 ml | – | 1.58 | |
| Peppermint ( | 0.1 ml | – | 1.08 | |||||
| Garlic ( | 0.1 ml | – | 0.68 | |||||
| Orange ( | 0.1 ml | – | 0.83 | |||||
| Citronella grass ( | 0.1 ml | – | 0.8 | |||||
| Lemongrass ( | 0.1 ml | – | 1.63 | |||||
| Clove ( | 0.1 ml | – | 1 | |||||
| Sweet basil ( | 0.1 ml | – | 0.75 | |||||
| Tavassoli et al. | 2001 | iran | Laboratory | Marigold ( | 50% | – | 2.15 | |
| Myrtle essential oil | 50% | – | 4.36 | |||||
| Younoussa et al. | 2016 | Cameroon | Laboratory | 4.0 mg/cm2 | – | 0.5 | ||
| 8.0 mg/cm2 | – | 1 | ||||||
| 12.0 mg/cm2 | – | 1.5 | ||||||
| 4.0 mg/cm2 | 46 | |||||||
| 8.0 mg/cm2 | – | 0.5 | ||||||
| 12.0 mg/cm2 | – | 1 | ||||||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2011 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3.5 | ||||||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2 | ||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2014 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||
| 2 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| Govindarajan et al. | 2015 | India | Laboratory | 1 mg/cm2 | 100 | 2.5 | ||
| 2.5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3 | ||||||
| 5 mg/cm2 | 100 | 3.5 | ||||||
| Innocent et al. | 2014 | Kenya | Laboratory | 0.01 w/v | 29 | – | ||
| 0.1 w/v | 48 | – | ||||||
| 1 w/v | 57 | – | ||||||
| 10 w/v | 64 | – | ||||||
| 0.01 w/v | 13 | – | ||||||
| 0.1 w/v | 21 | – | ||||||
| 1 w/v | 42 | – | ||||||
| 10 w/v | 56 | – | ||||||
| 0.01 w/v | 26 | – | ||||||
| 0.1 w/v | 46 | – | ||||||
| 1 w/v | 54 | – | ||||||
| 10 w/v | 62 | – | ||||||
| Kumar et al. | 2012 | India | Laboratory | 2 mg/l | 26 | – | ||
| 4 mg/l | 40 | – | ||||||
| 6 mg/l | 57 | – | ||||||
| 8 mg/l | 71 | – | ||||||
| 10 mg/l | 89 | – | ||||||
| Madhiyazhagan et al. | 2014 | India | Laboratory | 0.49 mg/l | 63 | – | ||
| 0.99 mg/l | 77 | – | ||||||
| 1.99 mg/l | 86 | – |
Stratification of potential of plant based repellents
| Protection time (hours) | Plant name | Concentration/dose | Anopheles species |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.5 | 25% | ||
| 11 | Pine oil ( Citronella (lemongrass oil) Peppermint oil | 1 ml without dilution 1 ml without dilution 1 ml without dilution 1 ml without dilution | |
| 8 < to < 10 | Peppermint oil | 1 ml without dilution 1 ml without dilution 4 mg/cm2 3 mg/cm2 | |
| 8 | 1 ml without dilution | ||
| Citronella ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Lavender ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Camphor ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Catnip ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Geranium ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Jasmine ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Broad-leaved eucalyptus ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Lemongrass ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Lemon-scented eucalyptus ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Amyris ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Narrow-leaved eucalyptus ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Carotin oil ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Cedarwood ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Chamomile ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Cinnamon ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Juniper ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Cajeput ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Soya bean ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Rosemary ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Niaouli ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Olive ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Tagetes ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Violet ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Sandalwood ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Litsea ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Galbanum ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| 25% | |||
| 7 < to < 8 | 2 mg/cm2 | ||
| Thyme ( | 20% oil solutions | ||
| Peppermint oil | 1 ml without dilution | ||
| 1 mg/cm2 | |||
| 7 | Lemon ( | 20% oil solution | |
| 6 < to < 7 | 50 ppm | ||
| rosewood ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| myrtle ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| peppermint ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| 6 | 20% oil solution | ||
| 1 ml without dilution | |||
| Turmeric ( | 3 ml | ||
| Citronella | 3 ml | ||
| Hairy basil oil | 3 ml | ||
| 10% | |||
| 5 < to < 6 | 6% | ||
| Eucalyptus ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Verbena ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| Chamomile ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| 15% | |||
| 20% | |||
| 6% | |||
| 2 mg/cm2 | |||
| 6% | |||
| Confertifolin essential oil | 10 ppm | ||
| 5 | Frankincense ( | 20% oil solution | |
| Sage ( | 20% oil solution | ||
| 10% | |||
Confertifolin essential oil | 5 ppm 2% | ||
| 4 < to < 5 | Clove oil Clove oil Myrtle essential oil | Cream 20% 20% gel 1/5 mg/cm2 50% 4% | |
| 4 | 5% | ||
| 1.5% |
Stratification of potential of plant based repellents by complete protection times, up to July 2018