Literature DB >> 12847928

Comparison of the effect of two excipients (karite nut butter and vaseline) on the efficacy of Cocos nucifera, Elaeis guineensis and Carapa procera oil-based repellents formulations against mosquitoes biting in Ivory Coast.

Y L Konan1, M S Sylla, J M Doannio, S Traoré.   

Abstract

Repellents in the form of dermal pomades are recommended as a protection against awakening and bedtime mosquito bites. If synthesis repellents are available, they are nevertheless not common and the prices remain out of reach for the communities concerned. The people therefore have to resort more and more to traditional concoctions, some of which have been shown to be effective. After demonstrating that oil-based formulations (lotions, creams, pomades) of Cocos nucifera (coconut), Elaeis guineensis (oil palm) and Carapa procera (gobi) were effective against mosquitoes, it became necessary to study the impact of the two excipients used in their manufacture, on the effectiveness of the repellents. Experiments were carried with Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti under lobaratory conditions and any other mosquitoes collected under field conditions in Ivory Coast. The laboratory results indicate that the average protection times obtained with formulations with karite nut butter as excipient (54.8 +/- 37.0 mn and 74.6 +/- 26.4 mn respectively on An. gambiae and Ae. aegypti) are higher than those recorded with vaseline as excipient (respectively 42.7 +/- 30.0 mn and 60.8 +/- 33.9 mn). On the other hand, under field conditions, the biting rate percentage reduction obtained with the products with karite nut butter and vaseline excipient were similar (respectively 29.8% and 35.9% for all mosquitoes collected and 45.7% and 47.4% against An. gambiae). Nevertheless, the use of karite nut butter on repellent products should be encouraged because its sale price is very lower (10 time less) than the vaseline's.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12847928     DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2003102181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasite        ISSN: 1252-607X            Impact factor:   3.000


  6 in total

1.  Malaria transmission in Libreville: results of a one year survey.

Authors:  Jean-Romain Mourou; Thierry Coffinet; Fanny Jarjaval; Christelle Cotteaux; Eve Pradines; Lydie Godefroy; Maryvonne Kombila; Frédéric Pagès
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 2.  Plant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testing.

Authors:  Marta Ferreira Maia; Sarah J Moore
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 2.979

3.  Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants used as insects repellents in six malaria endemic localities of Cameroon.

Authors:  Roger Ducos Fokouo Youmsi; Patrick Valère Tsouh Fokou; Elisabeth Zeuko'o Menkem; Issakou Bakarnga-Via; Rodrigue Keumoe; Victor Nana; Fabrice Fekam Boyom
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.733

Review 4.  A review on anti-peptic ulcer activities of medicinal plants used in the formulation of Enterica, Dyspepsia and NPK 500 capsules.

Authors:  Doris Kumadoh; Mary-Ann Archer; Genevieve N Yeboah; Michael O Kyene; Mavis Boakye-Yiadom; Ofosua Adi-Dako; Christina Osei-Asare; Emmanuel Adase; Alfred A Appiah; Susana O Mintah
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-11-29

5.  Anti-mosquito plants as an alternative or incremental method for malaria vector control among rural communities of Bagamoyo District, Tanzania.

Authors:  Ester Innocent; Ahmed Hassanali; William Nw Kisinza; Prince Pp Mutalemwa; Stephen Magesa; Edmund Kayombo
Journal:  J Ethnobiol Ethnomed       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.733

6.  Effectiveness of plant-based repellents against different Anopheles species: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amin Asadollahi; Mehdi Khoobdel; Alireza Zahraei-Ramazani; Sahar Azarmi; Sayed Hussain Mosawi
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.979

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.