Literature DB >> 31864166

Inhibitory-control training for cocaine use disorder and contingency management for clinic attendance: A randomized pilot study of feasibility, acceptability and initial efficacy.

Craig R Rush1, Justin C Strickland2, Erika Pike3, Christina R Studts4, William W Stoops5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cocaine abusers have impaired inhibitory Cocaine use is associated with impaired inhibitory control. This study determined the feasibility, acceptability, and initial efficacy of inhibitory-control training to cocaine or neutral images in cocaine use disorder patients.
METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to inhibitory-control training to cocaine (N = 20) or neutral (N = 20) images. Feasibility was assessed by percent of patients eligible for participation after a behavioral qualification session, time-to-target enrollment, percent of clinic visits attended, percent of participants who completed 80 % or more training sessions, and percent of follow-up visits attended. Acceptability was determined using a Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire. Initial efficacy was determined during training and a follow-up phase with urine samples tested qualitatively and quantitatively for cocaine. Participants in both conditions received monetary incentives delivered on an escalating schedule for clinic attendance.
RESULTS: The groups were well matched and no differences on demographic or substance use variables were observed. Attendance was stable during the treatment period with high overall attendance in both groups (average sessions attended: cocaine image group = 97 %; neutral image group = 90 %). No group differences were observed in the percentage of follow-up sessions attended (95 % for the cocaine-image group; 88 % of neutral-image group). Ratings on the Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire were high (i.e., mean scores ≥ 80 for all items rated on 101-unit visual analog scales). Participants in the cocaine- and neutral-image conditions did not differ significantly in terms of cocaine use during the training nor follow-up phase. Inhibitory-control training improved stop signal performance but not delay discounting.
CONCLUSION: The procedures were feasible and acceptable. Inhibitory-control training to cocaine images did not reduce cocaine use relative to the neutral image training condition. The inability to detect significant differences in cocaine use across the groups is not surprising given the small sample size. More research is needed to determine the utility of inhibitory-control training for cocaine use disorder. Future trials should determine whether inhibitory-control training to cocaine images augments the efficacy of other behavioral interventions. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Cocaine; Impulsivity; Inhibitory control; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31864166      PMCID: PMC6953399          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  52 in total

Review 1.  Detected, selected, and sometimes neglected: cognitive processing of cues in addiction.

Authors:  Frank Ryan
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Polydrug abusers display impaired discrimination-reversal learning in a model of behavioural control.

Authors:  Mark T Fillmore; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 4.153

3.  Drug-related stimuli impair inhibitory control in cocaine abusers.

Authors:  Erika Pike; William W Stoops; Mark T Fillmore; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Influence of Cocaine-Related Images and Alcohol Administration on Inhibitory Control in Cocaine Users.

Authors:  Erika Pike; Katherine R Marks; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  A pilot feasibility and acceptability study of yoga/meditation on the quality of life and markers of stress in persons living with HIV who also use crack cocaine.

Authors:  Ram P Agarwal; Adarsh Kumar; John E Lewis
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.579

6.  Alcohol-related stimuli reduce inhibitory control of behavior in drinkers.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Mark T Fillmore
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Acceptability of an Internet-based contingency management intervention for smoking cessation: views of smokers, nonsmokers, and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Bethany R Raiff; Brantley P Jarvis; Marissa Turturici; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Impaired inhibitory control of behavior in chronic cocaine users.

Authors:  Mark T Fillmore; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 9.  Psychological treatments for stimulant misuse, comparing and contrasting those for amphetamine dependence and those for cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Frank J Vocci; Iván D Montoya
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.741

Review 10.  A review of contingency management for the treatment of substance-use disorders: adaptation for underserved populations, use of experimental technologies, and personalized optimization strategies.

Authors:  Sterling M McPherson; Ekaterina Burduli; Crystal Lederhos Smith; Jalene Herron; Oladunni Oluwoye; Katherine Hirchak; Michael F Orr; Michael G McDonell; John M Roll
Journal:  Subst Abuse Rehabil       Date:  2018-08-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  Pilot testing of an adaptive, individualized inhibitory control training for binge drinking: first evidence on feasibility, acceptance, and efficacy.

Authors:  Daniela Reichl; Niklas Enewoldsen; Astrid Müller; Sabine Steins-Loeber
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-08-22

2.  Rejecting impulsivity as a psychological construct: A theoretical, empirical, and sociocultural argument.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Matthew W Johnson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.