Erika Pike1, William W Stoops, Mark T Fillmore, Craig R Rush. 1. Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Medical Behavioral Science Building, Lexington, KY 40536-0086, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky Arts and Sciences, Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cocaine users show impaired inhibitory control on cued go/no-go tasks and attention bias to drug-related stimuli in the emotional Stroop task. The results of a previous study suggested that there is a relationship between inhibitory control and attention bias in alcohol drinkers such that the presentation of alcohol-related images as a go cue in a cued go/no-go task significantly impaired inhibitory control compared to neutral images as a go cue. The present study determined the generality of these previous findings by assessing inhibitory control in cocaine users utilizing a modified cued go/no-go task with cocaine or neutral images as the cues. METHODS: Non-treatment seeking cocaine users (N=30) completed the modified task after completing detailed measures of demographics and drug use. Participants were matched on basic demographic factors and were assigned to groups in which they saw either a cocaine or neutral image as the go cue. RESULTS: Participants assigned to the cocaine image go cue condition had a significantly higher proportion of inhibitory failures to the no-go target than their counterparts assigned to the neutral cue condition, but there were no group differences on reaction time (i.e., accuracy was not traded for speed). CONCLUSIONS: Cocaine users were less able to inhibit pre-potent responses when a cocaine-related image served as the go cue than when a neutral image served as the go cue, consistent with previous research in alcohol users. The outcomes suggest that cocaine-related cues produce disinhibition, perhaps contributing to the high incidence of relapse or continued cocaine use.
BACKGROUND:Cocaine users show impaired inhibitory control on cued go/no-go tasks and attention bias to drug-related stimuli in the emotional Stroop task. The results of a previous study suggested that there is a relationship between inhibitory control and attention bias in alcohol drinkers such that the presentation of alcohol-related images as a go cue in a cued go/no-go task significantly impaired inhibitory control compared to neutral images as a go cue. The present study determined the generality of these previous findings by assessing inhibitory control in cocaine users utilizing a modified cued go/no-go task with cocaine or neutral images as the cues. METHODS: Non-treatment seeking cocaine users (N=30) completed the modified task after completing detailed measures of demographics and drug use. Participants were matched on basic demographic factors and were assigned to groups in which they saw either a cocaine or neutral image as the go cue. RESULTS:Participants assigned to the cocaine image go cue condition had a significantly higher proportion of inhibitory failures to the no-go target than their counterparts assigned to the neutral cue condition, but there were no group differences on reaction time (i.e., accuracy was not traded for speed). CONCLUSIONS:Cocaine users were less able to inhibit pre-potent responses when a cocaine-related image served as the go cue than when a neutral image served as the go cue, consistent with previous research in alcohol users. The outcomes suggest that cocaine-related cues produce disinhibition, perhaps contributing to the high incidence of relapse or continued cocaine use.
Authors: Scott D Lane; F Gerard Moeller; Joel L Steinberg; Matthew Buzby; Thomas R Kosten Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Shijing Liu; Scott D Lane; Joy M Schmitz; Andrew J Waters; Kathryn A Cunningham; F Gerard Moeller Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Rajkumar J Sevak; Andrea R Vansickel; William W Stoops; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Elise E DeVito; Brian D Kiluk; Charla Nich; Maria Mouratidis; Kathleen M Carroll Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Nadeeka R Dias; Joy M Schmitz; Nuvan Rathnayaka; Stuart D Red; Anne B Sereno; F Gerard Moeller; Scott D Lane Journal: Behav Brain Res Date: 2015-07-08 Impact factor: 3.332
Authors: Robert F Leeman; Cendrine D Robinson; Andrew J Waters; Mehmet Sofuoglu Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 3.157