Literature DB >> 31863927

Biomechanical comparison of polylactide-based versus titanium miniplates in mandible reconstruction in vitro.

C Steffen1, K Sellenschloh2, V Polster2, M Heyland3, M Vollmer2, M M Morlock2, M Heiland4, G Huber2, C Rendenbach5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the mechanical integrity and reliability of polylactide-based miniplates for osseous free flap fixation at the mandible in an experimental study setup of a mandible reconstruction model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 1.0mm titanium miniplates (group TI) (MatrixMandible, DePuy Synthes, Umkirch, Germany) and 1.5mm polylactide miniplates (group PL) (Inion CPS, Inion Oy, Tampere, Finland) were used to fix a polyurethane (PU) fibula segment to a PU mandible reconstruction model using monocortical non-locking screws. Mastication was simulated via unilateral cyclic dynamic loading at 1Hz with increasing loads (+ 0.15N/cycle, Bionix, MTS, USA). A 3D optical tracking system (Aramis, GOM, Braunschweig, Germany) was used to determine interosteotomy movements (IOM).
RESULTS: IOM were higher in the polylactide group (distal: P=0.001, mesial: P=0.001). Differences in mean stiffness (titanium: 478±68N/mm; polylactide: 425±38N/mm, P=0.240) and mean force at a vertical displacement of 1.0mm (titanium: 201.6±87.1N; polylactide: 141.3±29.9N, P=0.159) were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that polylactide-based miniplates provide reduced mechanical integrity and higher interosteotomy movements in comparison to titanium miniplates in vitro. Indications for clinical use of polylactide-based miniplates in mandible reconstruction have to be placed critically. Future studies will focus on clinical complications of polylactide-based plates in risk patients.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Fatigue strength; Fibula free flap; Mandible reconstruction; Mechanical integrity; Polylactide

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31863927     DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 2468-7855            Impact factor:   1.569


  5 in total

1.  Increased rate of pseudarthrosis in the anterior intersegmental gap after mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps: a volumetric analysis.

Authors:  Claudius Steffen; Heilwig Fischer; Marius Sauerbrey; Thelma Heintzelmann; Jan Oliver Voss; Steffen Koerdt; Sara Checa; Kilian Kreutzer; Max Heiland; Carsten Rendenbach
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Tailoring mechanical properties and degradation rate of maxillofacial implant based on sago starch/polylactid acid blend.

Authors:  Y Whulanza; A Azadi; S Supriadi; S F Rahman; M Chalid; M Irsyad; M H Nadhif; P Kreshanti
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-12-13

3.  Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Miniplates for Free Flap Fixation at the Mandible: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Kilian Kreutzer; Claudius Steffen; Steffen Koerdt; Christian Doll; Tobias Ebker; Susanne Nahles; Tabea Flügge; Max Heiland; Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter; Carsten Rendenbach
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 4.  Titanium or Biodegradable Osteosynthesis in Maxillofacial Surgery? In Vitro and In Vivo Performances.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Nico B Van Bakelen; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke Van Minnen
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 4.967

5.  Comparison of the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Barzi Gareb; Charlotte C Roossien; Nico B van Bakelen; Gijsbertus J Verkerke; Arjan Vissink; Ruud R M Bos; Baucke van Minnen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.