Literature DB >> 31863099

Analysis of a registry database for esophageal cancer from high-volume centers in China.

Y-S Mao1, S-G Gao1, Q Wang2, X-T Shi3, Y Li4, W-J Gao5, F-S Guan6, X F Li7, Y-T Han8, Y-Y Liu9, J-F Liu10, K Zhang11, S-Y Liu12, X-N Fu13, W-T Fang14, L-Q Chen15, Q-C Wu16, G-M Xiao17, K-N Chen18, G-G Jiao19, J-H Luo20, W-M Mao21, T-H Rong22, J-H Fu22, L-J Tang2, C Chen23, S-D Xu24, S-P Guo25, Z-T Yu26, J Hu27, Z-D Hu28, A Sihoe29, Y-K Yang1, N-N Ding1, D Yang1, Y-B Gao1, J He1.   

Abstract

Esophageal cancer has a high incidence among malignancies in China, but a comprehensive picture of the status of its surgical management in China has hitherto not been available. A nationwide database has recently been established to address this issue.
METHOD: A National Database was setup through a network platform, and data was collected from 70 high-volume centers (>100 esophagectomies/per year) across China. Data was entered between January 2009 and December 2014, and was analyzed in June 2015 after a minimal follow-up of 6 months for all patients. 8181 patients with complete data who received surgery for primary esophageal cancer on the Database were included in the analysis. RESULT: In this series, there were 6052 males and 2129 females, with a mean age of 60.5 years (range: 22-90 years). The pathology in 95.5% of patients was squamous cell carcinoma. The pathological stage distribution was 1.2% in stage 0, 2.5% in Ia, 11.5% in Ib, 14.8% in IIa, 36.1% in IIb, 19.3% in IIIa, 8.3% in IIIb, 6.2% in IIIc. 1800 patients (22.0%) with locally advanced disease received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and 3592 patients (43.9%) underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. The esophagectomies were performed through left thoracotomy approach in 5870 cases (72.6%), through right chest approach in 2215 cases (27.4%) including right thoracotomy (21.3%) and VATS (6.1%). The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 0.6% (43 patients), and the overall postoperative complication rate was 11.6% (951 patients). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 82.6%, 61.6%, and 52.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This National Registry Database from high-volume centers provides a comprehensive picture of surgical management for esophageal cancer in China for the first time. Squamous cell carcinoma predominates, but there is heterogeneity with respect to the surgical approach and perioperative oncologic management. Overall, surgical mortality and morbidity rates are low, and good survival rates have been achieved due to improvement of surgical treatment technology in recent years.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophageal cancer; outcomes; surgery; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31863099     DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  6 in total

1.  A multicenter single-arm trial of sintilimab in combination with chemotherapy for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable esophageal cancer (SIN-ICE study).

Authors:  Hongtao Duan; Tianhu Wang; Zhilin Luo; Xiaoyuan Wang; Honggang Liu; Liping Tong; Xiaoping Dong; Yong Zhang; Michele Valmasoni; Biniam Kidane; Khaldoun Almhanna; Ory Wiesel; Sainan Pang; Jianqun Ma; Xiaolong Yan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-11

2.  Comprehensive analysis of a new immune-related prognostic signature for esophageal cancer and its correlation with infiltrating immune cells and target genes.

Authors:  Zhang Peng; Xin-Yuan Liu; Zeng Cheng; Wu Kai; Zhao Song
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-10

3.  MiR-107 inhibits the malignant biological behavior of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by targeting TPM3.

Authors:  Peipei Zhang; Weiguang Zhang; Junfei Jiang; Zhimin Shen; Sui Chen; Shaobin Yu; Mingqiang Kang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-08

4.  Efficacy and safety of esophagectomy via left thoracic approach versus via right thoracic approach for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized clinical trial (NST1501).

Authors:  You-Sheng Mao; Shu-Geng Gao; Yin Li; An-Lin Hao; Jun-Feng Liu; Xiao-Fei Li; Tie-Hua Rong; Jian-Hua Fu; Jian-Qun Ma; Mei-Qing Xu; Ren-Quan Zhang; Gao-Ming Xiao; Xiang-Ning Fu; Ke-Neng Chen; Wei-Min Mao; Yong-Yu Liu; Hong-Xu Liu; Zhi-Rong Zhang; Yan Fang; Dong-Hong Fu; Xu-Dong Wei; Li-Gong Yuan; Shan Muhammad; Wen-Qiang Wei; Philip Wai-Yan Chiu; Shane Lloyd; Francisco Schlottmann; Kenneth Meredith; Jose M Pimiento; Yi-Bo Gao; Jie He
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-08

5.  Deep Learning for Automated Contouring of Gross Tumor Volumes in Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Linzhi Jin; Qi Chen; Aiwei Shi; Xiaomin Wang; Runchuan Ren; Anping Zheng; Ping Song; Yaowen Zhang; Nan Wang; Chenyu Wang; Nengchao Wang; Xinyu Cheng; Shaobin Wang; Hong Ge
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy in Resectable Esophageal Cancer: An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study (PEN-ICE).

Authors:  Hongtao Duan; Changjian Shao; Minghong Pan; Honggang Liu; Xiaoping Dong; Yong Zhang; Liping Tong; Yingtong Feng; Yuanyuan Wang; Lu Wang; Neil B Newman; Inderpal S Sarkaria; John V Reynolds; Francesco De Cobelli; Zhiqiang Ma; Tao Jiang; Xiaolong Yan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 8.786

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.