Literature DB >> 31861749

Learning by Doing…Errors! Comment on Gil-Lacruz et al. Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1397.

Michela Cortini1.   

Abstract

In their recent paper [...].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31861749      PMCID: PMC6982052          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17010051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


In their recent paper [1], Gil-Lacruz and colleagues provided a very interesting study on professional training, seen as a positive measure for improving the quality of the system and a strategy for the prevention of stress and an improved working environment. In particular, they offer an interesting view of a specific kind of training; that is, learning by doing. While this paper contributes to providing an overview of workplace learning by doing in the health sector, stressing all the possible outcomes that are identified and explained, some—a few, to be honest—issues could be further addressed. First of all, the authors, according to their research aims, frame learning as being, predominantly, an individual-based phenomenon: the process of learning seems to be something that happens between a singular employee and her/his organization. Actually, a growing body of literature refers to learning organizations [2,3,4] and the learning climate, stressing that there are organizational conditions that facilitate learning processes, especially in the health sector [5,6]. This is particularly true for a specific way of learning by doing, which occurs when we make mistakes. In fact, if, in more traditional ways of learning by doing, workers learn by themselves, in error management training, there is the possibility to learn by one’s own errors but also from those of others. Last but not least, even if the literature stresses the idea of life-long-learning, something explicitly shared by Gil-Lacruz and collegues—meaning that we have to learn on a continuous basis—it would be important to distinguish among early-career, middle-career and late-career stages; especially for the early-career and apprenticeship period, the possibility of making errors and learning from them should be supported by specific training programmes [7,8]. To conclude, health policies related to health care professionals could consider error management programs as a key resource to develop learning and improvement processes in their employees and organizations.
  4 in total

1.  Creating a climate for critical thinking in the preceptorship experience.

Authors:  F Myrick; O J Yonge
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  [The mediator role of the job related stress in the relation between learning climate and job performance. Evidences from the health sector.]

Authors:  Nicola D'Alterio; Stefania Fantinelli; Teresa Galanti; Michela Cortini
Journal:  Recenti Prog Med       Date:  2019-05

3.  Learning Climate and Job Performance among Health Workers. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michela Cortini; Monica Pivetti; Sara Cervai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-25

4.  Learning by Doing and Training Satisfaction: An Evaluation by Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Marta Gil-Lacruz; María Luisa Gracia-Pérez; Ana Isabel Gil-Lacruz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.