| Literature DB >> 31861742 |
Luisa Pozzo1, Rossella Russo1, Stefania Frassinetti1, Francesco Vizzarri2,3, Július Árvay4, Andrea Vornoli1,5, Donato Casamassima2, Marisa Palazzo2, Clara Maria Della Croce1, Vincenzo Longo1.
Abstract
Polyphenol-rich foods could have a pivotal function in the prevention of oxidative stress-based pathologies and antibacterial action. The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vitro antimicrobial activity, as well as the in vitro and in vivo antioxidant capacities of wild Prunus spinosa L. fruit (PSF) from the southeast regions of Italy. The total phenolic content (TPC) was quantified, and the single polyphenols were analyzed by HPLC-DAD, showing high rutin and 4-hydroxybenzoic acid levels, followed by gallic and trans-sinapic acids. PSF extract demonstrated antimicrobial activity against some potentially pathogenic Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. Besides, we investigated the cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) and the hemolysis inhibition of PSF extract on human erythrocytes, evidencing both a good antioxidant power and a marked hemolysis inhibition. Furthermore, an in vivo experiment with oxidative stress-induced rats treated with a high-fat diet (HFD) and a low dose of streptozotocin (STZ) demonstrated that PSF has a dose-dependent antioxidant capacity both in liver and in brain. In conclusion, the wild Italian Prunus spinosa L. fruit could be considered a potentially useful material for both nutraceutical and food industries because of its antioxidant and antimicrobial effects.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial; antioxidant; blackthorn; phenolic compounds; wild Italian Prunus spinosa L. fruit
Year: 2019 PMID: 31861742 PMCID: PMC7023410 DOI: 10.3390/foods9010005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Study design of the In Vivo experiment. CTR, control group; HFD, high-fat diet group; PSF400, PSF800.
Retention time (Rt), LOD (limit of detection), LOQ (limit of quantification), and recovery of phenolic compound quantification method by HPLC-DAD in the Prunus spinosa L. fruit (PSF) aqueous extract (n = 3).
| Phenolic Compound | Rt (min) | LOD (ug/mL) | LOQ (ug/mL) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid | 2.860 | 0.012 | 0.033 | 98.2 ± 0.81 |
| Rutin | 5.909 | 0.009 | 0.030 | 89.1 ± 0.89 |
| 4-hydroxibenzoic acid | 7.112 | 0.005 | 0.017 | 101.2 ± 1.01 |
| Caffeic acid | 8.361 | 0.008 | 0.027 | 97.5 ± 0.99 |
| Trans p-coumaric acid | 11.741 | 0.004 | 0.013 | 96.0 ± 0.80 |
| Trans -ferulic acid | 12.981 | 0.003 | 0.010 | 97.8 ± 1.08 |
| Trans-sinapic acid | 13.062 | 0.011 | 0.037 | 98.2 ± 1.15 |
| Myricetin | 17.081 | 0.015 | 0.050 | 99.5 ± 0.88 |
| Rosmarinic acid | 17.463 | 0.009 | 0.023 | 102.1 ± 0.96 |
| Quercetin | 18.853 | 0.090 | 0.299 | 99.5 ± 0.95 |
| Genistein | 19.811 | 0.009 | 0.031 | 91.5 ± 0.77 |
Concentrations of phenolic compounds in the PSF aqueous extract.
| Phenolic Compound | Concentration (mg/kg d.w.) |
|---|---|
| Gallic acid | 41.10 ± 3.68 |
| Rutin | 183.94 ± 0.45 |
| 4-hydroxybenzoic acid | 73.93 ± 0.06 |
| Caffeic acid | 3.36 ± 0.36 |
| Trans | 2.99 ± 0.02 |
| Trans-ferulic acid | 4.93 ± 0.07 |
| Trans-sinapic acid | 37.69 ± 0.05 |
| Myricetin | 1.47 ± 0.03 |
| Rosmarinic acid | 3.23 ± 0.03 |
| Quercetin | 9.94 ± 0.01 |
| Genistin | 1.74 ± 0.00 |
Figure 2Growth inhibition effect of PSF extract (0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mg/mL) against Gram-negative bacteria (A) (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella enterica ser. typhimurium ATCC 14028, and Enterobacter aerogenes ATCC 13048) and Gram-positive bacteria (B) (Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923). Significantly different from negative control (PSF 0 mg/mL): *** p ≤ 0.001. Results are reported as means (n = 3) values ± standard deviation.
Figure 3(A) Effects of PSF extract (100 mg/mL) on cellular antioxidant activity (CAA) in human erythrocytes. Significantly different from untreated cells (CAA unit = 0): *** p ≤ 0.001. (B) Effects of PSF extract (100 mg/mL) on dihydrochloride (AAPH)-induced oxidative hemolysis in human erythrocytes. Significantly different from CTR (AAPH-treated cells): *** p ≤ 0.001. Trolox was used as reference standard. Results are reported as means (n = 3) values ± standard deviation.
Nutritional effect of PSF on biochemical parameters in serum and liver of rats (n = 7).
| CTR | HFD | PSF400 | PSF800 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AST (UI/dl) | 93.98 ± 7.04 | 194.33 ** ± 42.90 | 181.00 ** ± 22.23 | 168.50 * ± 44.81 |
| ALT (UI/dl) | 39.06 ± 10.09 | 143.17 ** ± 35.15 | 146.52 ** ± 51.96 | 133.58 ** ± 36.90 |
| Insulin (µg/l) | 1.44 ± 0.80 | 0.19 ** ± 0.15 | 0.22 ** ± 0.15 | 0.20 ** ± 0.03 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 145.20 ± 20.80 | 439.67 *** ± 70.21 | 432.57 *** ± 33.57 | 443.60 *** ± 43.32 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 109.30 ± 21.40 | 236.20 *** ± 45.09 | 228.36 *** ± 29.13 | 219.18 *** ± 17.94 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 75.73 ± 7.38 | 179.80 ** ± 59.30 | 164.33 ** ± 30.52 | 170.25 ** ± 21.80 |
| Total hepatic lipids (mg/g) | 65.36 ± 9.14 | 209.90 *** ± 11.91 | 198.29 *** ± 34.52 | 162.15 *** § ± 35.52 |
Analyses were performed through one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test for post-hoc. *, p ≤ 0.05 vs. CTR; **, p ≤ 0.01 vs. CTR; ***, p ≤ 0.001 vs. CTR; §, p ≤ 0.05 vs. HFD. AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase.
Figure 4Effect of PSF treatment at two different concentrations (PSF400 and PSF800) on GSH content of liver (A) and brain (B), protein carbonylation of liver (C) and brain (D), and malondyaldeide of liver (E) and brain (F). Results are reported as means (n = 7) values ± standard deviation. Values within each row of different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05), p ≤ 0.05 vs. CTR; **, p ≤ 0.001 vs. CTR; ●●, p ≤ 0.01 vs. HFD; ●●●, p ≤ 0.001 vs. HFD.