| Literature DB >> 31861384 |
Xin Zhang1,2, Yamei Li1,2, Zhengping Feng1,2, Yaling Zhang1,2, Ye Gong1,2, Huanhuan Song1,2, Xiaoli Ding1,2, Yaping Yan1,2.
Abstract
Multifloroside (4), together with 10-hydroxyoleoside 11-methyl ester (1), 10-hydroxyoleoside dimethyl ester (2), and 10-hydroxyligustroside (3), are all secoiridoids, which are naturally occurring compounds that possess a wide range of biological and pharmacological activities. However, the anti-cancer activity of 1-4 has not been evaluated yet. The objective of this work was to study the anti-cancer activities of 1-4 in the human epidermoid carcinoma cell lines A431 and the human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines A549. The results indicate that 1-4 differ in potency in their ability to inhibit the proliferation of human A431 and A549 cells, and multifloroside (4) display the highest inhibitory activity against A431 cells. The structure-activity relationships suggest that the o-hydroxy-p-hydroxy-phenylethyl group may contribute to the anti-cancer activity against A431 cells. Multifloroside treatment can also inhibit cell colony formation, arrest the cell cycle in the S-phase, increase the levels of reactive-oxygen-species (ROS), and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), but it did not significantly induce cell apoptosis at low concentrations. The findings indicated that multifloroside (4) has the tendency to show selective anti-cancer effects in A431 cells, along with suppressing the colony formation, inducing S cell cycle arrest, ROS production, and increasing MMP.Entities:
Keywords: 10-oxyderivatives of oleoside secoiridoids; anti-cancer activities; flow cytometry; multifloroside; structure-activity relationship
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31861384 PMCID: PMC6983163 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of four 10-oxyderivative of oleoside secoiridoids (1–4) isolated from plants in the Oleaceae family. The images of the Oleaceae plants were downloaded from the Chinese Field Herbarium website (http://www.cfh.ac.cn/default.html).
Figure 2Anti-proliferative activity of compounds in two human cancer cell lines (A549 and A431) as determined by the MTT assay. (A) 1–4 against A549 cells, (B) 1–4 against A431 cells, (C) Multifloroside (4) against A549 cells, (D) Multifloroside (4) against A431 cells. All results are shown as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 indicate significant differences compared with the control.
Figure 3Colony formation of A431 cells inhibited by multifloroside. (A) A431 cells were incubated with the indicated concentrations of multifloroside or gefitinib and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with 0.2% crystal violet 12 days after cell treatment. (B) Bar chart showing the decrease in the number of colonies after incubation with multifloroside. (C) Micrographs showing differences between the cell colonies. Images were taken of stained single colonies observed under a microscope. A single colony was defined to be an aggregate of >50 cells. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 3), *** p < 0.001 indicates a significant difference compared with the control.
Figure 4Effect of multifloroside on cell apoptosis in A431 cells. (A) Representative histograms of apoptosis in the cells treated with multifloroside for 48 h, (B) Percentages of apoptotic cells in each group from (A). All values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). *** p < 0.001 indicates a significant differences compared with the control at the same group.
Figure 5Effect of multifloroside on the cell cycle phase distribution in A431 cells. (A) Representative histograms of DNA content in the cells treated with multifloroside for 48 h, and (B) percentages of cell populations in the G0/G1, S and G2/M phases from (A). All values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 indicate significant differences compared with the control at the same phase.
Figure 6Effect of multifloroside on ROS production. A431 cells were treated with different concentrations of multifloroside for 48 h, then MitoSox red reagent (5 µM) was loaded and the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for the quantification of multifloroside-induced oxidative stress in A431 cells. The fluorescence intensity of MitoSox Red reagent in cells was obtained by FACS (A) and the data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 5 (B). The values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). *** p < 0.001 indicates a significant differences compared with the control.
Figure 7Effect of multifloroside on the MMP of A431 cells. A431 cells were treated with different concentrations of multifloroside for 48 h and analyzed by flow cytometry after JC-10 staining. The fluorescent intensity of JC-10 in cells was obtained by FACS (A) and the data was analyzed by GraphPad Prism 5 (B). The percentage of cells with JC-10 red fluorescence is indicated. JC-10 fluorescence ratio (%) equals the red/green fluorescence intensity ratio. The values are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). ** p < 0.01 indicates a significant differences compared with the control.