Literature DB >> 31860455

Long versus short pulse width subcallosal cingulate stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial.

Rajamannar Ramasubbu1, Darren L Clark2, Sandra Golding2, Keith S Dobson3, Aaron Mackie4, Angela Haffenden4, Zelma Ht Kiss5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stimulation adjustment is required to optimise outcomes of deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment-resistant depression, but controlled data for ideal stimulation parameters are poor or insufficient. We aimed to establish the efficacy and safety of short pulse width (SPW) and long pulse width (LPW) subcallosal cingulate DBS in depression.
METHODS: We did a double-blind, randomised, crossover trial in an academic hospital in Calgary, AB, Canada. Patients had DSM IV-defined major depressive disorder and bipolar depression (20-70 years old, both sexes) and did not respond to treatment for more than 1 year, with a score of 20 or more on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) at recruitment. Patients underwent bilateral DBS implantation into the subcallosal cingulate white matter using diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 without stratification using a computerised list generator to receive either SPW (90 μs) or LPW (210-450 μs) stimulation for 6 months. Patients and the clinician assessing outcomes were masked to the stimulation group. Keeping frequency constant (130 Hz), either pulse width or voltage was increased monthly, based on response using the HDRS. Patients who did not respond to treatment (<50% reduction in HDRS from baseline) at 6 months crossed over to the opposite stimulation for another 6 months. All patients received individualised cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was change in HDRS at 6 months and 12 months using intention-to-treat analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01983904.
FINDINGS: Between Dec 5, 2013, and Sept 30, 2016, of 225 patients screened for eligibility, 23 patients were selected for DBS surgery. After one patient withdrew, 22 (mean age 46·4 years, SEM 3·1; 10 [45%] female, 12 [55%] male) were randomly assigned, ten (45%) to LPW stimulation and 12 (55%) to SPW stimulation. Patients were followed up at 6 months and 12 months. There was a significant reduction in HDRS scores (p<0·0001) with no difference between SPW and LPW groups (p=0·54) in the randomisation phase at 6 months. Crossover groups did not show a significant decrease in HDRS within groups (p=0·15) and between groups (p=0·21) from 6-12 months. Adverse events were equal between groups. Worsening anxiety and depression were the most common psychological adverse events. One patient in the SPW group died by suicide.
INTERPRETATION: Both LPW and SPW stimulation of subcallosal cingulate white matter tracts carried similar risks and were equally effective in reducing depressive symptoms, suggesting a role for both pulse width and amplitude titration in optimising clinical outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression. FUNDING: Alberta Innovates Health Solutions.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31860455     DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30415-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry        ISSN: 2215-0366            Impact factor:   27.083


  12 in total

1.  Metabolic activity in subcallosal cingulate predicts response to deep brain stimulation for depression.

Authors:  Elliot C Brown; Darren L Clark; Nils D Forkert; Christine P Molnar; Zelma H T Kiss; Rajamannar Ramasubbu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression.

Authors:  Martijn Figee; Patricio Riva-Posse; Ki Sueng Choi; Lucia Bederson; Helen S Mayberg; Brian H Kopell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.088

3.  Patient-specific connectomic models correlate with, but do not reliably predict, outcomes in deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Darin D Dougherty; Yogesh Rathi; Alik S Widge; Fan Zhang; Aishwarya Gosai; George Papadimitrou; Peter Wilson-Braun; Magdalini Tsintou; Senthil Palanivelu; Angela M Noecker; Cameron C McIntyre; Lauren O'Donnell; Nicole C R McLaughlin; Benjamin D Greenberg; Nikolaos Makris
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 8.294

4.  Recruitment Challenges for Studies of Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Sandra Golding; Kimberly Williams; Aaron Mackie; Glenda MacQueen; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 5.  Nutritional therapy can reduce the burden of depression management in low income countries: A review.

Authors:  Moses B Ekong; Clementina F Iniodu
Journal:  IBRO Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-06-26

6.  Computational investigation of the impact of deep brain stimulation contact size and shape on neural selectivity.

Authors:  Daria Nesterovich Anderson; Alan D Dorval; John D Rolston; Stefan M Pulst; Collin J Anderson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Four Deep Brain Stimulation Targets for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Are They Different?

Authors:  Suzanne N Haber; Anastasia Yendiki; Saad Jbabdi
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 12.810

8.  Deep brain stimulation telemedicine for psychiatric patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Chencheng Zhang; Kaiwen Zhu; Dianyou Li; Valerie Voon; Bomin Sun
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Personality changes with subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation in patients with treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Laina McAusland; Sanchit Chopra; Darren L Clark; Bettina H Bewernick; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.186

10.  Intraoperative neural signals predict rapid antidepressant effects of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Mohammad S E Sendi; Allison C Waters; Helen S Mayberg; Babak Mahmoudi; Vineet Tiruvadi; Patricio Riva-Posse; Andrea Crowell; Faical Isbaine; John T Gale; Ki Sueng Choi; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.