Literature DB >> 31860081

Proteomic screening of plasma identifies potential noninvasive biomarkers associated with significant/advanced fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Wei Hou1,2, Michael G Janech3,4, Philip M Sobolesky3,5, Alison M Bland3,4, Salma Samsuddin6, William Alazawi6, Wing-Kin Syn1,7,8.   

Abstract

Noninvasive biomarkers are clinically useful for evaluating liver fibrosis stage in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of the present study was to compare plasma proteins in patients with early nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (F0-F1) versus NASH with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2-F4) to determine whether candidate proteins could be used as potential noninvasive biomarkers. Nineteen biopsy-proven NAFLD patients including ten early NASH patients and nine NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis were enrolled in the present study. High-resolution proteomics screening of plasma was performed with the SCIEX TripleTOF 5600 System. Proteins were quantified using two different software platforms, Progenesis Qi and Scaffold Q+, respectively. Progenesis Qi analysis resulted in the discovery of 277 proteins compared with 235 proteins in Scaffold Q+. Five consensus proteins (i.e. Complement component C7; α-2-macroglobulin; Complement component C8 γ chain; Fibulin-1; α-1-antichymotrypsin) were identified. Complement component C7 was three-fold higher in the NASH group with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2-F4) compared with the early NASH (F0-F1) group (q-value = 3.6E-6). Complement component C7 and Fibulin-1 are positively correlated with liver stiffness (P=0.000, P=0.002, respectively); whereas, Complement component C8 γ chain is negatively correlated (P=0.009). High levels of Complement C7 are associated with NASH with significant/advanced fibrosis and Complement C7 is a perfect classifier of patients included in this pilot study. Further studies will be needed in a larger validation cohort to confirm the utility of complement proteins as biomarkers or mechanistic determinants of NASH with significant/advanced fibrosis.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complement; Liver fibrosis; NAFLD; Noninvasive biomarker; Proteomics

Year:  2020        PMID: 31860081      PMCID: PMC6944676          DOI: 10.1042/BSR20190395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosci Rep        ISSN: 0144-8463            Impact factor:   3.840


Introduction

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), one of the most common liver diseases worldwide, can be categorized histologically into nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) [1]. Accurately evaluating liver fibrosis stage in NAFLD patients is of importance for identifying those who may progress to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although a liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing and determining the stages of fibrosis, there is an urgent need to develop noninvasive methods [2-12], including imaging modalities [13-17], biomarkers [18-26], and artificial intelligence algorithms [27-32]. The purpose of the present study was to perform proteomic screening of plasma via SCIEX TripleTOF 5600 System [33-35] to identify potential noninvasive biomarkers in NAFLD patients with significant/advanced liver fibrosis.

Methods

Patients

Plasma samples were acquired through the ‘Prevalence and Risk Factors for NAFLD in patients with T2DM’ study conducted at the Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, United Kingdom (U.K.). The study was approved by the National Research Ethic Service (Reference 14/WA/1142) and carried out in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Histological evaluation

All patients enrolled in the present study had undergone a percutaneous liver biopsy. Fibrosis stage was scored according to the Kleiner classification [36] on a 5-point scale (F0–F4).

Clinical and biochemical data

Relevant clinical data were recorded, including the patients’ age, sex, weight, and height. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m) squared. Venous blood samples were collected in lithium-heparin tubes and plasma was stored at −80°C until analysis. Laboratory evaluation in all patients included measurement of the serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Liver stiffness for all patients were assessed by FibroScan.

Proteomics and data processing

Plasma was assayed for total protein (Bio-Rad Protein Assay) and 5 µl was digested with trypsin (1:10 ratio enzyme to protein) for 18 h at 37°C following following reduction and alkylation as we previously described [37]. Peptides were desalted using solid phase extraction cartridges (Strata-x, Phenomenex) and eluted sequentially in 25% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid and 45% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid. Each peptide fraction was diluted 1:4000 in 0.1% formic acid and 10 µl injected on to a 2-cm c18 trap column (Dionex pepmap100, Thermo Scientific). Peptides were separated on a c18 analytical column (15 cm × 75 µm, Dionex pepmap 100) for 60 min from 0.1% formic acid to 50% acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid. Data were acquired in IDA mode on a SCIEX 5600. Wiff files were uploaded to Progenesis Qi or converted into .MGFs for MASCOT searching (v2.4) against the human proteome database (SwissProt/UniProt; 2015) before being loaded to Scaffold Q+. Both Progenesis Qi and Scaffold Q+ were utilized to determine significant protein differences to construct a consensus differential protein list to reduce analytical bias of a single software platform. Proteomics data of the present study has been loaded into the ProteomeXchange database (Submission Reference No.: 1-20190126-112361).

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences in Progenesis Qi were determined using ANOVA of log2 transformed data and P-values corrected for local false discovery rate (q-value). Proteins with q-values less than 0.05 were considered different. Statistical differences in Scaffold Q+ were determined using a t test of normalized spectral abundance factors (NSAF) as a comparison with Progenesis Qi results. NSAF values were not transformed for normality, nor were P-values adjusted for multiple comparisons. For statistically different proteins (Progenesis Qi), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created in Sigmaplot plotted using the data from Progenesis Qi, and the areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were calculated in order to represent classification performance. Correlation analysis was performed by using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient test in SPSS (IBM). Differences were considered to be statistically significant at P<0.05.

Results

Characteristics of NAFLD patients

A total of 19 biopsy-proven NAFLD patients were enrolled in the present study, including 10 early NASH patients and 9 NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis. The characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. There were no significant differences in terms of sex, age, BMI, ALT, AST and smoking between the two groups. Patients with significant/advanced NASH fibrosis had elevated liver stiffness (P<0.001), Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score (P<0.01), and a higher prevalence of diabetes (P<0.001).
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the patients enrolled in the study

Early NASH (F0-1)Advanced NASH (F2–4)P-value
Sex (M/F)(4/6)(5/4)0.65
Age (Mean [Range], Years)55.6 [35–70]58.4 [47–74]0.56
BMI31 ± 432 ± 40.38
Diabetes (No. Pts)19<0.001
Stiffness (kPa)5.8 ±1.719.7 ± 9.8<0.001
FIB41.1 ± 0.22.1 ±0.9<0.01
ALT44 ± 3465 ± 290.34
AST34 ± 2051 ± 190.14
Smoker (%)90%89%1

Differentially abundant plasma proteins

Progenesis Qi workflow analysis resulted in the discovery of 277 proteins compared with 235 proteins in Scaffold Q+ workflow. Five consensus proteins (i.e. Complement component C7; α-2-macroglobulin; Complement component C8 γ chain; Fibulin-1; α-1-antichymotrypsin) were shown in Table 2. Hierarchal clustering of 17 significantly different proteins from the Progenesis Qi workflow was utilized to group patients using an average (UPGMA) agglomeration method in R Studio. Color intensity indicates standard deviations from the mean (Z-score) in a positive (red) or negative (blue) direction (Figure 1). The volcano plot (log2 fold change vs. P-value) displays all proteins identified in the Progenesis Qi analysis (Figure 2). Complement component C7 was three-fold higher (log2 = 1.65) in the NASH group (F2–F4) with significant/advanced fibrosis compared with the early NASH (F0-F1) group (q-value = 3.6E-6).
Table 2

Identification of five consensus proteins via Progenesis Qi and Scaffold Q+ analysis in NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis versus early NASH patients

Protein nameProgenesis Qi (total proteins = 277)Scaffold Q (total proteins = 235)
Complement component C7
α-2-macroglobulin
Complement component C8 γ chain
Fibulin-1 OS = Homo sapiens
α-1-antichymotrypsin
Figure 1

Hierarchal clustering heat map of significant plasma proteins as discovered by Progenesis Qi analysis

Hierarchal clustering of 17 significantly different proteins was utilized to group patients using an average (UPGMA) agglomeration method in R Studio. Color intensity indicates standard deviations from the mean (Z-score) in a positive (red) or negative (blue) direction.

Figure 2

The volcano plot of all proteins identified in the Progenesis Qi analysis

Complement C7 was circled above and was three-fold higher (log2 = 1.65) in the NASH group with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4) compared with the early NASH (F0-F1) group (actual q-value = 3.6E-6, but was changed to 0.0001 for display purposes).

Hierarchal clustering heat map of significant plasma proteins as discovered by Progenesis Qi analysis

Hierarchal clustering of 17 significantly different proteins was utilized to group patients using an average (UPGMA) agglomeration method in R Studio. Color intensity indicates standard deviations from the mean (Z-score) in a positive (red) or negative (blue) direction.

The volcano plot of all proteins identified in the Progenesis Qi analysis

Complement C7 was circled above and was three-fold higher (log2 = 1.65) in the NASH group with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4) compared with the early NASH (F0-F1) group (actual q-value = 3.6E-6, but was changed to 0.0001 for display purposes).

ROC curves

Classification performance was estimated using AUROCs for the five consensus different proteins identified. As shown in Figure 3A, the AUROCs for those proteins elevated in NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4) are 1.00 (Complement component C7), 0.87 (α-2-macroglobulin), and 0.79 (Fibulin-1), respectively. As shown in Figure 3B, the AUROCs for those proteins reduced in NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4) are both 0.80 (Complement component C8 γ chain; α-1-antichymotrypsin).
Figure 3

Classification performance estimated using ROC curve for the five consensus differential plasma proteins

(A) Proteins elevated in the NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4). (B) Proteins lower in the NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4). Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve. All areas have a P-value <0.03.

Classification performance estimated using ROC curve for the five consensus differential plasma proteins

(A) Proteins elevated in the NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4). (B) Proteins lower in the NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4). Abbreviation: AUC, area under the curve. All areas have a P-value <0.03.

Correlation analysis

As shown in Table 3, Complement component C7 and Fibulin-1 are positively correlated with liver stiffness (P=0.000, P=0.002, respectively); whereas, Complement component C8 γ chain is negatively correlated (P=0.009). Moreover, Complement C7 and α-2-macroglobulin were positively correlated with FIB-4 (P=0.031, P=0.042, respectively) while Complement component C8 γ chain was negatively correlated with FIB-4 (P=0.013). Interestingly, Complement component C7 also positively correlated with HBA1c (P=0.045) while γ-1-antichymotrypsin is negatively correlated with ALT (P=0.036).
Table 3

Pearson’s r correlation analysis of five consensus differential plasma proteins

StiffnessComplement C7α-2- macroglobulinComplement C8 γ chainFibulin-1α-1-antichymotrypsin
StiffnessPearson correlation-0.7400.4070.5840.657−0.453
Sig. (two-tailed)-0.0000.0840.0090.0020.051
n-1919191919
FIB-4Pearson correlation0.5020.556*0.530*0.623*0.297−0.330
Sig. (two-tailed)0.0560.0310.0420.0130.2820.230
n151515151515
ALTPearson correlation0.1260.0370.185−0.4590.3200.511*
Sig. (two-tailed)0.6290.8870.4770.0640.2100.036
n171717171717
HBA1cPearson correlation0.5390.613*0.438−0.0770.0100.068
Sig. (two-tailed)0.0870.0450.1780.8210.9770.843
n111111111111
BMIPearson Correlation0.2770.2280.264−0.1670.2670.072
Sig. (two-tailed)0.2510.3470.2740.4940.2700.770
N191919191919

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed). Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

Discussion

The present study showed for the first time that Complement C7 and C8 γ chain and Fibulin-1 significantly correlate with liver stiffness. Moreover, Complement C7 acted as a potential biomarker to identify those NASH patients with significant/advanced liver fibrosis. The complement system, a phylogenetically ancient makeup of the humoral system, consisting of a cascade of proteases and soluble factors, plays a vital role in innate immune [38]. The role of complement in liver diseases is less well characterized. The complement components C3 and C5 were reported to be associated with NAFLD [39-41] and C5 had a causal role in liver fibrogenesis [42]. There are strong and persistent stimuli for complement activation in NAFLD through multiple pathways, including the classical pathway and the lectin pathway [43], as well as the alternative pathway [44]. The complement component 7 (C7) is a terminal component of the complement cascade. The role C7 plays in the pathogenesis and progression of NAFLD are largely unknown. Our results showed that C7 was three-fold higher in the NASH group with significant/advanced fibrosis (F2–F4) compared with the early NASH (F0-F1) group, consistent with previous studies [45], suggesting C7 might be an important contributor in the pathogenesis of NAFLD. The exact mechanisms of C7 in the progress of NAFLD need to be further elucidated. One limitation of our pilot study is the relatively small number of patients. Nevertheless, the sample numbers were sufficient to show significant differences in plasma proteins between early NASH and NASH with significant/advanced fibrosis in a conceptual approach. In summary, the present study demonstrated that Complement C7 and C8 γ chain as well as Fibulin-1 significantly correlated with liver stiffness. Elevated levels of Complement C7 were detected in NASH patients with significant/advanced fibrosis and were a perfect classifier for patients included in this pilot study. Further studies in a larger validation cohort will be needed to confirm the utility of complement proteins as potential biomarkers or mechanistic determinants of progressive NASH. Accurately evaluating liver fibrosis stage in NAFLD is important because it enables the identification of those most likely to progress to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although a liver biopsy remains the current gold standard for diagnosis and staging of liver disease, it is invasive, costly, and with inherent risks; hence there is an urgent need to develop noninvasive methods. Proteomic screening of plasma via SCIEX TripleTOF 5600 System identified potential noninvasive biomarkers of NAFLD patients with significant/advanced liver fibrosis. Complement components C7 and C8 γ chain, and Fibulin-1 significantly correlated with liver stiffness. In this pilot, high levels of Complement C7 were associated with NASH with significant/advanced fibrosis and Complement C7 is a perfect classifier of patients with NASH.
  45 in total

1.  Comparison of triple quadrupole and high-resolution TOF-MS for quantification of peptides.

Authors:  Lieve Dillen; Willy Cools; Liesbeth Vereyken; Willy Lorreyne; Tinne Huybrechts; Ronald de Vries; Hesham Ghobarah; Filip Cuyckens
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Platelet count for predicting fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Masato Yoneda; Hideki Fujii; Yoshio Sumida; Hideyuki Hyogo; Yoshito Itoh; Masafumi Ono; Yuichiro Eguchi; Yasuaki Suzuki; Noriaki Aoki; Kazuyuki Kanemasa; Kento Imajo; Kazuaki Chayama; Toshiji Saibara; Norifumi Kawada; Kazuma Fujimoto; Yutaka Kohgo; Toshikazu Yoshikawa; Takeshi Okanoue
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: noninvasive assessment with MR elastography.

Authors:  Donghee Kim; W Ray Kim; Jayant A Talwalkar; Hwa Jung Kim; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Diagnosis and Evaluation of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Including Noninvasive Biomarkers and Transient Elastography.

Authors:  Eugenia Tsai; Tai-Ping Lee
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.126

5.  Association between Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein and the fibrosis stage of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Masanori Abe; Teruki Miyake; Atsushi Kuno; Yasuharu Imai; Yoshiyuki Sawai; Keisuke Hino; Yuichi Hara; Shuhei Hige; Michiie Sakamoto; Gotaro Yamada; Masayoshi Kage; Masaaki Korenaga; Yoichi Hiasa; Masashi Mizokami; Hisashi Narimatsu
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 6.  The role of the complement system in metabolic organs and metabolic diseases.

Authors:  Julia Phieler; Ruben Garcia-Martin; John D Lambris; Triantafyllos Chavakis
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 11.130

Review 7.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Brunt; Vincent W-S Wong; Valerio Nobili; Christopher P Day; Silvia Sookoian; Jacquelyn J Maher; Elisabetta Bugianesi; Claude B Sirlin; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Mary E Rinella
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 52.329

8.  Identifying Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Advanced Fibrosis in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Yuval A Patel; Elizabeth J Gifford; Lisa M Glass; Marsha J Turner; Byungjoo Han; Cynthia A Moylan; Steve Choi; Ayako Suzuki; Dawn Provenzale; Christine M Hunt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Hepatic connexin 32 associates with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease severity.

Authors:  Jay Luther; Manish K Gala; Nynke Borren; Ricard Masia; Russell P Goodman; Ida Hatoum Moeller; Erik DiGiacomo; Alyssa Ehrlich; Andrew Warren; Martin L Yarmush; Ashwin Ananthakrishnan; Kathleen Corey; Lee M Kaplan; Sangeeta Bhatia; Raymond T Chung; Suraj J Patel
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2018-07-16

Review 10.  Candidate Biomarkers of Liver Fibrosis: A Concise, Pathophysiology-oriented Review.

Authors:  Mattia Bellan; Luigi Mario Castello; Mario Pirisi
Journal:  J Clin Transl Hepatol       Date:  2018-07-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Noninvasive proteomic biomarkers for alcohol-related liver disease.

Authors:  Lili Niu; Maja Thiele; Philipp E Geyer; Ditlev Nytoft Rasmussen; Henry Emanuel Webel; Alberto Santos; Rajat Gupta; Florian Meier; Maximilian Strauss; Maria Kjaergaard; Katrine Lindvig; Suganya Jacobsen; Simon Rasmussen; Torben Hansen; Aleksander Krag; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 87.241

2.  Comparative Proteomics Combined with Morphophysiological Analysis Revealed Chilling Response Patterns in Two Contrasting Maize Genotypes.

Authors:  Jinpeng Zou; Liang Yang; Yuhong Li; Mingxin Piao; Yaxing Li; Nan Yao; Xiaohong Zhang; Qian Zhang; Guanghui Hu; Deguang Yang; Zecheng Zuo
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 3.  Diagnostic management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a transformational period in the development of diagnostic and predictive tools-a narrative review.

Authors:  Natalia Rosso; Adam M Stephenson; Pablo J Giraudi; Claudio Tiribelli
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 4.  Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin as a novel biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy prediction in human diseases.

Authors:  Yanxia Jin; Weidong Wang; Qiyun Wang; Yueyang Zhang; Kashif Rafiq Zahid; Umar Raza; Yongsheng Gong
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.429

Review 5.  Hepatocyte Injury and Hepatic Stem Cell Niche in the Progression of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Authors:  Diletta Overi; Guido Carpino; Antonio Franchitto; Paolo Onori; Eugenio Gaudio
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Accurately Exclude Advanced Fibrosis and Are Associated with Higher Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Patients with NAFLD or Viral Chronic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Stefano Ballestri; Alessandro Mantovani; Enrica Baldelli; Simonetta Lugari; Mauro Maurantonio; Fabio Nascimbeni; Alessandra Marrazzo; Dante Romagnoli; Giovanni Targher; Amedeo Lonardo
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-09

7.  Differences of core genes in liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from integrated bioinformatics and immunohistochemical analysis.

Authors:  Yue Li; Shou-Li Yuan; Jing-Ya Yin; Kun Yang; Xin-Gang Zhou; Wen Xie; Qi Wang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-07-15

8.  Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Liver Tissues and Serum in db/db Mice.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Xiumei Wu; Mengyun Xu; Tong Yue; Ping Ling; Tingyu Fang; Sihui Luo; Suowen Xu; Jianping Weng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 6.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.