Yuval A Patel1, Elizabeth J Gifford2, Lisa M Glass3,4, Marsha J Turner5, Byungjoo Han5, Cynthia A Moylan6, Steve Choi6, Ayako Suzuki6, Dawn Provenzale6,5, Christine M Hunt6,5. 1. Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Box 3913, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. Yuval.Patel@duke.edu. 2. Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. VA Ann Arbor Healthcare Systems, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham Veterans Administration Medical Center, Box 3913, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease. Severe NAFLD with advanced fibrosis results in substantial morbidity and mortality. Associated with metabolic syndrome, NAFLD is often initially clinically silent, yet intensive lifestyle intervention with 7% or greater weight loss can improve or resolve NAFLD. Using a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) liver biopsy cohort, we evaluated simple noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems to identify NAFLD with advanced fibrosis (or severe disease) to assist providers. METHODS: In our retrospective study of a national VHA sample of patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD or normal liver (2005-2015), we segregated patients by fibrosis stage (0-4). Non-NAFLD liver disease was excluded. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 calculator (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AST/ALT ratio), AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and body mass index, AST/ALT ratio, and diabetes (BARD) score by age groups. RESULTS: We included 329 patients with well-defined liver histology (296 NAFLD and 33 normal controls without fibrosis), in which 92 (28%) had advanced (stage 3-4) fibrosis. Across all age groups, NFS and FIB-4 best predicted advanced fibrosis (NFS with 0.676 threshold: AUROC 0.71-0.76, LR + 2.30-22.05, OR 6.00-39.58; FIB-4 with 2.67 threshold: AUROC of 0.62-0.80, LR + 4.70-27.45, OR 16.34-59.65). CONCLUSIONS: While NFS and FIB-4 scores exhibit good diagnostic accuracy, FIB-4 is optimal in identifying NAFLD advanced fibrosis in the VHA. Easily implemented as a point-of-care clinical test, FIB-4 can be useful in directing patients that are most likely to have advanced fibrosis to GI/hepatology consultation and follow-up.
BACKGROUND:Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common cause of chronic liver disease. Severe NAFLD with advanced fibrosis results in substantial morbidity and mortality. Associated with metabolic syndrome, NAFLD is often initially clinically silent, yet intensive lifestyle intervention with 7% or greater weight loss can improve or resolve NAFLD. Using a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) liver biopsy cohort, we evaluated simple noninvasive fibrosis scoring systems to identify NAFLD with advanced fibrosis (or severe disease) to assist providers. METHODS: In our retrospective study of a national VHA sample of patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD or normal liver (2005-2015), we segregated patients by fibrosis stage (0-4). Non-NAFLD liver disease was excluded. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 calculator (FIB-4), aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AST/ALT ratio), AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and body mass index, AST/ALT ratio, and diabetes (BARD) score by age groups. RESULTS: We included 329 patients with well-defined liver histology (296 NAFLD and 33 normal controls without fibrosis), in which 92 (28%) had advanced (stage 3-4) fibrosis. Across all age groups, NFS and FIB-4 best predicted advanced fibrosis (NFS with 0.676 threshold: AUROC 0.71-0.76, LR + 2.30-22.05, OR 6.00-39.58; FIB-4 with 2.67 threshold: AUROC of 0.62-0.80, LR + 4.70-27.45, OR 16.34-59.65). CONCLUSIONS: While NFS and FIB-4 scores exhibit good diagnostic accuracy, FIB-4 is optimal in identifying NAFLD advanced fibrosis in the VHA. Easily implemented as a point-of-care clinical test, FIB-4 can be useful in directing patients that are most likely to have advanced fibrosis to GI/hepatology consultation and follow-up.
Authors: Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Jeanne M Clark; Nathan M Bass; Mark L Van Natta; Aynur Unalp-Arida; James Tonascia; Claudia O Zein; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal; Anna Mae Diehl; Joel E Lavine; Naga Chalasani; Kris V Kowdley Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: David Goldberg; Ivo C Ditah; Kia Saeian; Mona Lalehzari; Andrew Aronsohn; Emmanuel C Gorospe; Michael Charlton Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-01-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Bryan C Batch; Karen Goldstein; William S Yancy; Linda L Sanders; Susanne Danus; Steven C Grambow; Hayden B Bosworth Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Naga Chalasani; Zobair Younossi; Joel E Lavine; Michael Charlton; Kenneth Cusi; Mary Rinella; Stephen A Harrison; Elizabeth M Brunt; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Jeffrey W Molloy; Christopher J Calcagno; Christopher D Williams; Frances J Jones; Dawn M Torres; Stephen A Harrison Journal: Hepatology Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Sahil Mittal; Hashem B El-Serag; Yvonne H Sada; Fasiha Kanwal; Zhigang Duan; Sarah Temple; Sarah B May; Jennifer R Kramer; Peter A Richardson; Jessica A Davila Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-07-18 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: J Sonya Haw; Karla I Galaviz; Audrey N Straus; Alysse J Kowalski; Matthew J Magee; Mary Beth Weber; Jingkai Wei; K M Venkat Narayan; Mohammed K Ali Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Andrew D Schreiner; Jingwen Zhang; Valerie Durkalski-Mauldin; Sherry Livingston; Justin Marsden; John Bian; Patrick D Mauldin; William P Moran; Don C Rockey Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: Andrew D Schreiner; William P Moran; Jingwen Zhang; Sherry Livingston; Justin Marsden; Patrick D Mauldin; David Koch; Mulugeta Gebregziabher Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-19 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Wei Hou; Michael G Janech; Philip M Sobolesky; Alison M Bland; Salma Samsuddin; William Alazawi; Wing-Kin Syn Journal: Biosci Rep Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.840