Importance: Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOEε4) is the single most important genetic risk factor for Alzheimer disease. While APOEε4 is associated with increased amyloid-β burden, its association with cerebral tau pathology has been controversial. Objective: To determine whether APOEε4 is associated with medial temporal tau pathology independently of amyloid-β, sex, clinical status, and age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a study of 2 cross-sectional cohorts of volunteers who were cognitively normal, had mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or had Alzheimer disease dementia: the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) study (data collected between October 2017 and July 2019) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (collected between November 2015 and June 2019). The first cohort (TRIAD) comprised cognitively normal elderly participants (n = 124), participants with MCI (n = 50), and participants with Alzheimer disease (n = 50) who underwent tau positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine 18-labeled MK6240 and amyloid-β PET with [18F]AZD4694. The second sample (ADNI) was composed of cognitively normal elderly participants (n = 157), participants with MCI (n = 83), and participants with Alzheimer disease (n = 25) who underwent tau PET with [18F]flortaucipir and amyloid-β PET with [18F]florbetapir. Exclusion criteria were a history of other neurological disorders, stroke, or head trauma. There were 489 eligible participants, selected based on availability of amyloid-PET, tau-PET, magnetic resonance imaging, and genotyping for APOEε4. Forty-five young adults (<30 years) from the TRIAD cohort were not selected for this study. Main Outcomes and Measures: A main association between APOEε4 and tau-PET standardized uptake value ratio, correcting for age, sex, clinical status, and neocortical amyloid-PET standardized uptake value ratio. Results: The mean (SD) age of the 489 participants was 70.5 (7.1) years; 171 were APOEε4 carriers (34.9%), and 230 of 489 were men. In both cohorts, APOEε4 was associated in increased tau-PET uptake in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus independently of amyloid-β, sex, age, and clinical status after multiple comparisons correction (TRIAD: β = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.49; ADNI: β = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.19; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Our results indicate that the elevated risk of developing dementia conferred by APOEε4 genotype involves mechanisms associated with both amyloid-β and tau aggregation. These results contribute to an evolving framework in which APOEε4 has deleterious consequences in Alzheimer disease beyond its link with amyloid-β and suggest APOEε4 as a potential target for future disease-modifying therapeutic trials targeting tau pathology.
Importance: Apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOEε4) is the single most important genetic risk factor for Alzheimer disease. While APOEε4 is associated with increased amyloid-β burden, its association with cerebral tau pathology has been controversial. Objective: To determine whether APOEε4 is associated with medial temporal tau pathology independently of amyloid-β, sex, clinical status, and age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a study of 2 cross-sectional cohorts of volunteers who were cognitively normal, had mild cognitive impairment (MCI), or had Alzheimer disease dementia: the Translational Biomarkers in Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) study (data collected between October 2017 and July 2019) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (collected between November 2015 and June 2019). The first cohort (TRIAD) comprised cognitively normal elderly participants (n = 124), participants with MCI (n = 50), and participants with Alzheimer disease (n = 50) who underwent tau positron emission tomography (PET) with fluorine 18-labeled MK6240 and amyloid-β PET with [18F]AZD4694. The second sample (ADNI) was composed of cognitively normal elderly participants (n = 157), participants with MCI (n = 83), and participants with Alzheimer disease (n = 25) who underwent tau PET with [18F]flortaucipir and amyloid-β PET with [18F]florbetapir. Exclusion criteria were a history of other neurological disorders, stroke, or head trauma. There were 489 eligible participants, selected based on availability of amyloid-PET, tau-PET, magnetic resonance imaging, and genotyping for APOEε4. Forty-five young adults (<30 years) from the TRIAD cohort were not selected for this study. Main Outcomes and Measures: A main association between APOEε4 and tau-PET standardized uptake value ratio, correcting for age, sex, clinical status, and neocortical amyloid-PET standardized uptake value ratio. Results: The mean (SD) age of the 489 participants was 70.5 (7.1) years; 171 were APOEε4 carriers (34.9%), and 230 of 489 were men. In both cohorts, APOEε4 was associated in increased tau-PET uptake in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus independently of amyloid-β, sex, age, and clinical status after multiple comparisons correction (TRIAD: β = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.49; ADNI: β = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.19; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Our results indicate that the elevated risk of developing dementia conferred by APOEε4 genotype involves mechanisms associated with both amyloid-β and tau aggregation. These results contribute to an evolving framework in which APOEε4 has deleterious consequences in Alzheimer disease beyond its link with amyloid-β and suggest APOEε4 as a potential target for future disease-modifying therapeutic trials targeting tau pathology.
Authors: Denis S Smirnov; David P Salmon; Douglas Galasko; Vanessa S Goodwill; Lawrence A Hansen; Yu Zhao; Steven D Edland; Gabriel C Léger; Guerry M Peavy; Diane M Jacobs; Robert Rissman; Donald P Pizzo; Annie Hiniker Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-11-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Giovanni B Frisoni; Daniele Altomare; Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Federica Ribaldi; Rik van der Kant; Rik Ossenkoppele; Kaj Blennow; Jeffrey Cummings; Cornelia van Duijn; Peter M Nilsson; Pierre-Yves Dietrich; Philip Scheltens; Bruno Dubois Journal: Nat Rev Neurosci Date: 2021-11-23 Impact factor: 34.870
Authors: Mitzi M Gonzales; Jasmeet Samra; Adrienne O'Donnell; R Scott Mackin; Joel Salinas; Mini E Jacob; Claudia L Satizabal; Hugo J Aparicio; Emma G Thibault; Justin S Sanchez; Rebecca Finney; Zoe B Rubinstein; Danielle V Mayblyum; Ron J Killiany; Charlie S Decarli; Keith A Johnson; Alexa S Beiser; Sudha Seshadri Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Daniel S Albrecht; Abhay Sagare; Maricarmen Pachicano; Melanie D Sweeney; Arthur Toga; Berislav Zlokovic; Helena Chui; Elizabeth Joe; Lon Schneider; John C Morris; Tammie Benzinger; Judy Pa Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Renaud La Joie; Adrienne V Visani; Orit H Lesman-Segev; Suzanne L Baker; Lauren Edwards; Leonardo Iaccarino; David N Soleimani-Meigooni; Taylor Mellinger; Mustafa Janabi; Zachary A Miller; David C Perry; Julie Pham; Amelia Strom; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Howard J Rosen; Bruce L Miller; William J Jagust; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-12-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Antoine Leuzy; Hanna Cho; Carole H Sudre; Olof Strandberg; Ruben Smith; Sebastian Palmqvist; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Tomas Olsson; Jonas Jögi; Erik Stormrud; Young Hoon Ryu; Jae Yong Choi; Adam L Boxer; Maria L Gorno-Tempini; Bruce L Miller; David Soleimani-Meigooni; Leonardo Iaccarino; Renaud La Joie; Edilio Borroni; Gregory Klein; Michael J Pontecorvo; Michael D Devous; Sylvia Villeneuve; Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Gil D Rabinovici; Oskar Hansson Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Yi-Ting T Wang; Tharick A Pascoal; Joseph Therriault; Min Su Kang; Andréa L Benedet; Melissa Savard; Cécile Tissot; Firoza Z Lussier; Jaime Fernandez Arias; Sulantha Mathotaarachchi; Maria Natasha Rajah; Serge Gauthier; Pedro Rosa-Neto Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2021-06-07