Denis S Smirnov1, David P Salmon1, Douglas Galasko1, Vanessa S Goodwill1, Lawrence A Hansen1, Yu Zhao1, Steven D Edland1, Gabriel C Léger1, Guerry M Peavy1, Diane M Jacobs1, Robert Rissman1, Donald P Pizzo1, Annie Hiniker2. 1. From the Departments of Neurosciences (D.S.S., D.P.S., D.G., G.C.L., G.M.P., D.M.J., R.R., A.H.), Pathology (V.S.G., L.A.H., D.P.P., A.H.), and Family Medicine and Public Health (Y.Z., S.D.E.), University of California, San Diego; and VA San Diego Healthcare System (D.G., R.R., A.H.), CA. 2. From the Departments of Neurosciences (D.S.S., D.P.S., D.G., G.C.L., G.M.P., D.M.J., R.R., A.H.), Pathology (V.S.G., L.A.H., D.P.P., A.H.), and Family Medicine and Public Health (Y.Z., S.D.E.), University of California, San Diego; and VA San Diego Healthcare System (D.G., R.R., A.H.), CA. ahiniker@health.ucsd.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with earlier age at onset of sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD) are more likely than those with later onset to present with atypical clinical and cognitive features. We sought to determine whether this age-related clinical and cognitive heterogeneity is mediated by different topographic distributions of tau-aggregate neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) or by variable amounts of concomitant non-AD neuropathology. METHODS: The relative distribution of NFT density in hippocampus and midfrontal neocortex was calculated, and α-synuclein, TAR DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43), and microvascular copathologies were staged, in patients with severe AD and age at onset of 51-60 (n = 40), 61-70 (n = 41), and >70 (n = 40) years. Regression, mediation, and mixed effects models examined relationships of pathologic findings with clinical features and longitudinal cognitive decline. RESULTS: Patients with later age at onset of AD were less likely to present with nonmemory complaints (odds ratio [OR] 0.46 per decade, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.88), psychiatric symptoms (β = -0.66, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.17), and functional impairment (β = -1.25, 95% CI -2.34 to -0.16). TDP-43 (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.23-3.35) and microvascular copathology (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.24-3.40) were more common in later onset AD, and α-synuclein copathology was not related to age at onset. NFT density in midfrontal cortex (β = -0.51, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.31) and midfrontal/hippocampal NFT ratio (β = -0.18, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.10) were lower in those with later age at onset. Executive function (β = 0.48, 95% CI 0.09-0.90) and visuospatial cognitive deficits (β = 0.97, 95% CI 0.46-1.46) were less impaired in patients with later age at onset. Mediation analyses showed that the effect of age at onset on severity of executive function deficits was mediated by midfrontal/hippocampal NFT ratio (β = 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.38) and not by concomitant non-AD pathologies. Midfrontal/hippocampal NFT ratio also mediated an association between earlier age at onset and faster decline on tests of global cognition, executive function, and visuospatial abilities. DISCUSSION: Worse executive dysfunction and faster cognitive decline in people with sporadic AD with earlier rather than later age at onset is mediated by greater relative midfrontal neocortical to hippocampal NFT burden and not by concomitant non-AD neuropathology.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with earlier age at onset of sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD) are more likely than those with later onset to present with atypical clinical and cognitive features. We sought to determine whether this age-related clinical and cognitive heterogeneity is mediated by different topographic distributions of tau-aggregate neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) or by variable amounts of concomitant non-AD neuropathology. METHODS: The relative distribution of NFT density in hippocampus and midfrontal neocortex was calculated, and α-synuclein, TAR DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43), and microvascular copathologies were staged, in patients with severe AD and age at onset of 51-60 (n = 40), 61-70 (n = 41), and >70 (n = 40) years. Regression, mediation, and mixed effects models examined relationships of pathologic findings with clinical features and longitudinal cognitive decline. RESULTS: Patients with later age at onset of AD were less likely to present with nonmemory complaints (odds ratio [OR] 0.46 per decade, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.88), psychiatric symptoms (β = -0.66, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.17), and functional impairment (β = -1.25, 95% CI -2.34 to -0.16). TDP-43 (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.23-3.35) and microvascular copathology (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.24-3.40) were more common in later onset AD, and α-synuclein copathology was not related to age at onset. NFT density in midfrontal cortex (β = -0.51, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.31) and midfrontal/hippocampal NFT ratio (β = -0.18, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.10) were lower in those with later age at onset. Executive function (β = 0.48, 95% CI 0.09-0.90) and visuospatial cognitive deficits (β = 0.97, 95% CI 0.46-1.46) were less impaired in patients with later age at onset. Mediation analyses showed that the effect of age at onset on severity of executive function deficits was mediated by midfrontal/hippocampal NFT ratio (β = 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.38) and not by concomitant non-AD pathologies. Midfrontal/hippocampal NFT ratio also mediated an association between earlier age at onset and faster decline on tests of global cognition, executive function, and visuospatial abilities. DISCUSSION: Worse executive dysfunction and faster cognitive decline in people with sporadic AD with earlier rather than later age at onset is mediated by greater relative midfrontal neocortical to hippocampal NFT burden and not by concomitant non-AD neuropathology.
Authors: Bradley T Hyman; Creighton H Phelps; Thomas G Beach; Eileen H Bigio; Nigel J Cairns; Maria C Carrillo; Dennis W Dickson; Charles Duyckaerts; Matthew P Frosch; Eliezer Masliah; Suzanne S Mirra; Peter T Nelson; Julie A Schneider; Dietmar Rudolf Thal; Bill Thies; John Q Trojanowski; Harry V Vinters; Thomas J Montine Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: M L Gorno-Tempini; A E Hillis; S Weintraub; A Kertesz; M Mendez; S F Cappa; J M Ogar; J D Rohrer; S Black; B F Boeve; F Manes; N F Dronkers; R Vandenberghe; K Rascovsky; K Patterson; B L Miller; D S Knopman; J R Hodges; M M Mesulam; M Grossman Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: R I Pfeffer; T T Kurosaki; C H Harrah; J M Chance; D Bates; R Detels; S Filos; C Butzke Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1981-10 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Sukriti Nag; Lei Yu; Ana W Capuano; Robert S Wilson; Sue E Leurgans; David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: L Hansen; D Salmon; D Galasko; E Masliah; R Katzman; R DeTeresa; L Thal; M M Pay; R Hofstetter; M Klauber Journal: Neurology Date: 1990-01 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jacob W Vogel; Alexandra L Young; Neil P Oxtoby; Ruben Smith; Rik Ossenkoppele; Olof T Strandberg; Renaud La Joie; Leon M Aksman; Michel J Grothe; Yasser Iturria-Medina; Michael J Pontecorvo; Michael D Devous; Gil D Rabinovici; Daniel C Alexander; Chul Hyoung Lyoo; Alan C Evans; Oskar Hansson Journal: Nat Med Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Peter T Nelson; Dennis W Dickson; John Q Trojanowski; Clifford R Jack; Patricia A Boyle; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Rosa Rademakers; Irina Alafuzoff; Johannes Attems; Carol Brayne; Ian T S Coyle-Gilchrist; Helena C Chui; David W Fardo; Margaret E Flanagan; Glenda Halliday; Suvi R K Hokkanen; Sally Hunter; Gregory A Jicha; Yuriko Katsumata; Claudia H Kawas; C Dirk Keene; Gabor G Kovacs; Walter A Kukull; Allan I Levey; Nazanin Makkinejad; Thomas J Montine; Shigeo Murayama; Melissa E Murray; Sukriti Nag; Robert A Rissman; William W Seeley; Reisa A Sperling; Charles L White; Lei Yu; Julie A Schneider Journal: Brain Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 15.255
Authors: Denis S Smirnov; David P Salmon; Douglas Galasko; Steven D Edland; Donald P Pizzo; Vanessa Goodwill; Annie Hiniker Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 11.274