Xi Lan1, Yi-Qi Zhang1, Hong-Li Dong1, Ju Zhang2, Feng-Ming Zhou1, Yan-Hong Bao1, Rong-Ping Zhao1, Cong-Jie Cai1, Dan Bai1, Xin-Xin Pang1, Guo Zeng1. 1. Department of Nutrition, Food Safety and Toxicology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 16, Section 3, Renmin Nan Road, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sichuan Provincial Hospital for Women and Children, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) in the first trimester (GWG-F) and the rate of gestational weight gain in the second trimester (RGWG-S) on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), exploring the optimal GWG ranges for the avoidance of GDM in Chinese women. DESIGN: A population-based prospective study was conducted. Gestational weight was measured regularly in every antenatal visit and assessed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria (2009). GDM was assessed with the 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of GWG-F and RGWG-S on GDM, stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI. In each BMI category, the GWG values corresponding to the lowest prevalence of GDM were defined as the optimal GWG range. SETTING: Southwest China. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women (n 1910) in 2017. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, GWG-F above IOM recommendations increased the risk of GDM (OR; 95 % CI) among underweight (2·500; 1·106, 5·655), normal-weight (1·396; 1·023, 1·906) and overweight/obese women (3·017; 1·118, 8·138) compared with women within IOM recommendations. No significant difference was observed between RGWG-S and GDM (P > 0·05) after adjusting for GWG-F based on the previous model. The optimal GWG-F ranges for the avoidance of GDM were 0·8-1·2, 0·8-1·2 and 0·35-0·70 kg for underweight, normal-weight and overweight/obese women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Excessive GWG in the first trimester, rather than the second trimester, is associated with increased risk of GDM regardless of pre-pregnancy BMI. Obstetricians should provide more pre-emptive guidance in achieving adequate GWG-F.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of gestational weight gain (GWG) in the first trimester (GWG-F) and the rate of gestational weight gain in the second trimester (RGWG-S) on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), exploring the optimal GWG ranges for the avoidance of GDM in Chinese women. DESIGN: A population-based prospective study was conducted. Gestational weight was measured regularly in every antenatal visit and assessed by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria (2009). GDM was assessed with the 75-g, 2-h oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the effects of GWG-F and RGWG-S on GDM, stratified by pre-pregnancy BMI. In each BMI category, the GWG values corresponding to the lowest prevalence of GDM were defined as the optimal GWG range. SETTING: Southwest China. PARTICIPANTS: Pregnant women (n 1910) in 2017. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounders, GWG-F above IOM recommendations increased the risk of GDM (OR; 95 % CI) among underweight (2·500; 1·106, 5·655), normal-weight (1·396; 1·023, 1·906) and overweight/obesewomen (3·017; 1·118, 8·138) compared with women within IOM recommendations. No significant difference was observed between RGWG-S and GDM (P > 0·05) after adjusting for GWG-F based on the previous model. The optimal GWG-F ranges for the avoidance of GDM were 0·8-1·2, 0·8-1·2 and 0·35-0·70 kg for underweight, normal-weight and overweight/obesewomen, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:Excessive GWG in the first trimester, rather than the second trimester, is associated with increased risk of GDM regardless of pre-pregnancy BMI. Obstetricians should provide more pre-emptive guidance in achieving adequate GWG-F.
Authors: Zhi-Hao Cheng; Yu-Mei Wei; Hong-Tian Li; Hong-Zhao Yu; Jian-Meng Liu; Yu-Bo Zhou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Irina Oltean; Jason Tran; Sarah Lawrence; Brittany Ann Ruschkowski; Na Zeng; Cameron Bardwell; Youssef Nasr; Joseph de Nanassy; Dina El Demellawy Journal: Heliyon Date: 2021-03-02