Literature DB >> 31858148

Predictors of Complications, Functional Outcome, and Morbidity in a Large Cohort Treated With Flow Diversion.

Ahmad Sweid1, Robert M Starke2, Nabeel Herial1, Nohra Chalouhi1, Somnath Das1, Michael P Baldassari1, Tyler D Alexander1, Stavropoula Tjoumakaris1, M Reid Gooch1, David Hasan3, Robert H Rosenwasser1, Victor Romo4, Pascal Jabbour1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A dramatic improvement in obliteration rates of large, wide-necked aneurysms has been observed after the FDA approved the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) in 2011.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictors of complications, morbidity, and unfavorable outcomes in a large cohort of patients with aneurysms treated with PED.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a prospectively maintained database for subjects treated with flow diversion from 2010 to 2019.
RESULTS: A total of 598 aneurysms were treated during a period extending from 2010 to 2019 (84.28% females, mean age 55.5 yr, average aneurysm size 8.49 mm). Morbidity occurred at a rate of 5.8% and mortality at a rate of 2.2%. Ischemic stroke occurred at a rate of 3%, delayed aneurysmal rupture (DAR) at 1.2%, and distal intraparenchymal hemorrhage (DIPH) at 1.5%. On multivariate analysis, the predictor of stroke was aneurysm size >15 mm. Predictors of DAR were previous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), increasing aneurysm size, and posterior circulation aneurysm. Predictors of DIPH were using more than 1 PED and baseline P2Y12 value. Predictors of in-stent stenosis were the increasing year of treatment and balloon angioplasty, whereas increasing age and previous treatment were negatively associated with in-stent stenosis. Predictors of morbidity were posterior circulation aneurysms, increasing aneurysm size, and hypertension, and incidental aneurysm diagnosis was protective for morbidity.
CONCLUSION: Flow diversion is a safe and effective treatment option for aneurysms. A better understanding of predictive factors of complications, morbidity, and functional outcomes is of high importance for a more accurate risk assessment.
Copyright © 2019 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Embolization; Endovascular treatment; Flow diversion device; Large cohort

Year:  2020        PMID: 31858148     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  5 in total

1.  Determinants of intracranial aneurysm retreatment following embolization with a single flow-diverting stent.

Authors:  Justin E Vranic; Pablo Harker; Christopher J Stapleton; Robert W Regenhardt; Adam A Dmytriw; Naif M Alotaibi; Rajiv Gupta; Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi; Matthew J Koch; Scott B Raymond; Justin R Mascitelli; T Tyler Patterson; Joshua Seinfeld; Andrew White; David Case; Christopher Roark; Chirag D Gandhi; Fawaz Al-Mufti; Jared Cooper; Aman B Patel
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2021-11-07

2.  Pipeline Embolization device for intracranial aneurysms in a large Chinese cohort: factors related to aneurysm occlusion.

Authors:  Bin Luo; Huibin Kang; Hongqi Zhang; Tianxiao Li; Jianmin Liu; Donglei Song; Yuanli Zhao; Sheng Guan; Aisha Maimaitili; Yunyan Wang; Wenfeng Feng; Yang Wang; Jieqing Wan; Guohua Mao; Huaizhang Shi; Xinjian Yang
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 6.570

3.  A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score.

Authors:  Huibin Kang; Bin Luo; Jian Liu; Anxin Wang; Hongqi Zhang; Tianxiao Li; Donglei Song; Yuanli Zhao; Sheng Guan; Yunyan Wang; Wenfeng Feng; Yang Wang; Huaizhang Shi; Jianmin Liu; Xinjian Yang
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 6.570

4.  Machine learning to predict in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device placement.

Authors:  Dachao Wei; Dingwei Deng; Siming Gui; Wei You; Junqiang Feng; Xiangyu Meng; Xiheng Chen; Jian Lv; Yudi Tang; Ting Chen; Peng Liu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Preclinical safety and efficacy evaluation of the Pipeline Vantage Embolization Device with Shield Technology.

Authors:  Robert M Starke; John Thompson; Ariana Pagani; Animesh Choubey; John M Wainwright; Michael F Wolf; Reza Jahanbekam; Gaurav Girdhar
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 5.836

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.