| Literature DB >> 31858040 |
Andrew J Hess1, Andrew J Funk1, Qingkun Liu1, Joshua A De La Cruz2, Ghadah H Sheetah2, Blaise Fleury1, Ivan I Smalyukh1,2,3.
Abstract
Optical properties can be programmed on mesoscopic scales by patterning host materials while ordering their nanoparticle inclusions. While liquid crystals are often used to define the ordering of nanoparticles dispersed within them, this approach is typically limited to liquid crystals confined in classic geometries. In this work, the orientational order that liquid crystalline colloidal hosts impose on anisotropic nanoparticle inclusions is combined with an additive manufacturing method that enables engineered, macroscopic three-dimensional (3D) patterns of co-aligned gold nanorods and cellulose nanocrystals. These gels exhibit polarization-dependent plasmonic properties that emerge from the unique interaction between the host medium's anisotropic optical properties defined by orientationally ordered cellulose nanocrystals, from the liquid crystal's gold nanorod inclusions, and from the complexity of spatial patterns accessed with 3D printing. The gels' optical properties that are defined by the interplay of these effects are tuned by controlling the gels' order, which is tuned by adjusting the gels' cellulose nanocrystal concentrations. Lithe optical responsiveness of these composite gels to polarized radiation may enable unique technological applications like polarization-sensitive optical elements.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31858040 PMCID: PMC6906772 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02418
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) micrograph demonstrating CNCs’ anisotropy, which enables guest–host alignment in a gel. (b) Spectral characterization of GNR inclusions with transverse (∼530 nm) and longitudinal (∼630 nm) surface plasmon resonance (SPR) extinction peaks. An aqueous dispersion of GNRs as viewed with the background white light is shown in the inset (c). (d) A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrograph of the top surface of a gel with the GNRs’ longitudinal axis aligned with the local in-plane director N(r), as shown. Guest GNRs (white rods) are aligned by host CNCs (dark background) and constrained within the same gel. The gel with GNRs viewed in the plane of their transverse axes, as indicated by N(r), is shown in the micrograph (e). The imaged ends of the GNRs (white dots) are indicated by the white arrows. The inset (f) shows a TEM micrograph of GNRs drop-cast on a substrate.
Figure 2Schematics depicting manufacturing Procedure 1 (not to scale). (a) Structures of the chemicals that are mixed with GNRs and CNCs to make the gel precursor. (b) CNCs and GNRs are orientationally aligned along the flow of the gel precursor by a DIW 3D printing process. (c) Gelation of the printed sol with UV light. (d) PAM chains are cross-linked at points along each polymer’s length.
Figure 3Optically anisotropic metamaterial hydrogels. (a–c) Single-layer hydrogels printed via Procedure 1. (a) With N ∥ P, as shown by the double-headed arrows, the LSPR mode predominates, giving a blueish hue. (b) The disc in (a) rotated in-plane by 90° such that N ⊥ P with the TSPR predominating, giving a reddish hue. (c) The “CU” logo with continuously changing N(r), as indicated by the blue curves, simultaneously exhibits extinction from the LSPR and TSPR modes. (d, e) Single-layer disks printed using Procedure 2. (d) Isotropic organization of both CNCs and GNRs. (e) Guest–host alignment with incident light of polarization P, experiencing TSPR extinction. (f) Analysis of GNR alignment with average N in a single-layer disc prepared according to Procedure 2. The LSPR extinction peak predominates when N ∥ P (0°), while the TSPR extinction peak predominates when N ⊥ P (±90°). Both extinction-peak maxima demonstrate that the GNRs’ longitudinal axes are aligned with the printing direction and N. (g) The birefringent disc from (a) and (b) under polarizing optical microscopy (POM) with N ∥ P results in a minimum transmitted intensity, where the transmission axes of the polarizer P and analyzer A are as shown. (h) With N rotated 45° from either P or A, the birefringent disc exhibits peak transmitted intensity of the incident white light. (i) With N ∥ A under POM, an intensity minimum occurs again. The POM micrographs in (g)–(i) indicate that average director N is parallel with the printing direction, which can be seen as the striping in each image. POM analysis provides wavelength-independent evidence of the CNCs’ N alignment with the direction of printing. (j) A two-layer hydrogel micrograph captured with brightfield microscopy. The horizontal stripes represent the top layer that rests on the bottom layer, which is printed vertically. (k) The sample in (j) under POM and a full-wave retardation plate with slow-axis γ at 530 nm. Bottom (blue-appearing) and top (yellow-appearing) layers have a uniform intralayer N with orthogonal interlayer alignment. For a layer exhibiting a blue color, N ∥ γ, while for a layer exhibiting a yellow color, N ⊥ γ. (l) The sample in (k) with reversed color schemes demonstrating an in-plane rotation of 90°.
Figure 4(a) Spectral extinction peaks (LSPR: N ∥ P, TSPR: N ⊥ P), with incident polarization P from a hydrogel and its subsequent aerogel. (b) A subsection of the CU-shaped plasmonic hydrogel exhibiting the reddish and bluish appearing TSPR and LSPR absorption modes, respectively. (c) The same section is shown in (b) after the hydrogel becomes an aerogel. (d) The entire CU-shaped hydrogel whose subsection in (b) is indicated by the dashed rectangle. (e) The entire CU-shaped aerogel. (f) The printed hydrogel’s guest–host alignment is represented by the black curves with director field N(r). (g) An alcogel with ethanol. (h) An aerogel with preserved structure and N(r) formed by supercritical carbon dioxide drying.