Literature DB >> 31855608

Sync Pending: Characterizing Conversational Entrainment in Dysarthria Using a Multidimensional, Clinically Informed Approach.

Stephanie A Borrie1, Tyson S Barrett2, Julie M Liss3, Visar Berisha3,4.   

Abstract

Purpose Despite the import of conversational entrainment to successful spoken dialogue, the systematic characterization of this behavioral syncing phenomenon represents a critical gap in the field of speech pathology. The goal of this study was to acoustically characterize conversational entrainment in the context of dysarthria using a multidimensional approach previously validated in healthy populations (healthy conversations; Borrie, Barrett, Willi, & Berisha, 2019). Method A large corpus of goal-oriented conversations between participants with dysarthria and healthy participants (disordered conversations) was elicited using a "spot the difference" task. Expert clinical assessment of entrainment and a measure of conversational success (communicative efficiency) was obtained for each of the audio-recorded conversations. Conversational entrainment of acoustic features representing rhythmic, articulatory, and phonatory dimensions of speech was identified using cross-recurrence quantification analysis with clinically informed model parameters and validated with a sham condition involving conversational participants who did not converse with one another. The relationship between conversational entrainment and communicative efficiency was examined. Results Acoustic evidence of entrainment was observed in phonatory, but not rhythmic and articulatory, behavior, a finding that differs from healthy conversations in which entrainment was observed in all speech signal dimensions. This result, that disordered conversations showed less acoustic entrainment than healthy conversations, is corroborated by clinical assessment of entrainment in which the disordered conversations were rated, overall, as being less in sync than healthy conversations. Furthermore, acoustic entrainment was predictive of communicative efficiency, corroborated by a relationship between clinical assessment and the same outcome measure. Conclusions The findings confirm our hypothesis that the pathological speech production parameters of dysarthria disrupt the seemingly ubiquitous phenomenon of conversational entrainment, thus advancing entrainment deficits as an important variable in dysarthria, one that may have causative effects on the success of everyday communication. Results further reveal that while this approach provides a broad overview, methodologies for characterizing conversational entrainment in dysarthria must continue to be developed and refined, with a focus on clinical utility. Supplemental Material https://osf.io/ktg5q.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31855608      PMCID: PMC7213480          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  24 in total

1.  Rhythm as a coordinating device: entrainment with disordered speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Understanding dysrhythmic speech: When rhythm does not matter and learning does not happen.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Kaitlin L Lansford; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Performance in a Collaborative Search Task: The Role of Feedback and Alignment.

Authors:  Moreno I Coco; Rick Dale; Frank Keller
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-11-13

4.  Regularity Matters: Unpredictable Speech Degradation Inhibits Adaptation to Dysarthric Speech.

Authors:  Kaitlin L Lansford; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Modeling Pathological Speech Perception From Data With Similarity Labels.

Authors:  Visar Berisha; Julie Liss; Steven Sandoval; Rene Utianski; Andreas Spanias
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process       Date:  2014-05

6.  The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Melissa Baese-Berk; Rachel E Baker; Arim Choi; Midam Kim; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction.

Authors:  T L Chartrand; J A Bargh
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-06

8.  Acquired dysarthria in conversation: identifying sources of understandability problems.

Authors:  Steven Bloch; Ray Wilkinson
Journal:  Int J Lang Commun Disord       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  The Role of Somatosensory Information in Speech Perception: Imitation Improves Recognition of Disordered Speech.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Martina C M Schäfer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Cross-recurrence quantification analysis of categorical and continuous time series: an R package.

Authors:  Moreno I Coco; Rick Dale
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-27
View more
  3 in total

1.  Methodology Matters: The Impact of Research Design on Conversational Entrainment Outcomes.

Authors:  Camille J Wynn; Stephanie A Borrie
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Conversational Coordination of Articulation Responds to Context: A Clinical Test Case With Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Camille J Wynn; Visar Berisha; Nichola Lubold; Megan M Willi; Carl A Coelho; Tyson S Barrett
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Healthy Communication Partners Modify Their Speech When Conversing With Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Nichola Lubold; Megan M Willi; Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Visar Berisha
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.297

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.