Literature DB >> 31854119

A randomised clinical trial to compare octyl cyanoacrylate with absorbable monofilament sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions.

Yacine Ben Safta1, Mohamed Maatouk1, Mohamed T Bouzidi1, Nabil Sakly2, Aymen Mabrouk1, Marwa Bouafif1, Sarra Sghaier1, Hamida Maghraoui3, Chadli Dziri4, Mounir Ben Moussa1.   

Abstract

Tissue adhesives have gained increasing use as a possible method of wound closure. We compared the use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (OCA) or subcuticular suture in incisions sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions. A prospective randomised controlled trial was performed. Patients were randomised to have closure of laparoscopic port sites using either OCA or sutures. Patients were reviewed at 24 hours and returned for follow-up 1 week and 1 month after postoperatively. At these times, different wound characteristics were documented: Two tools were used to measure the cosmetic result using Hollander wound evaluation scale (HWES) and the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS). A total of 70 patients, 35 in each group were enrolled. The wounds were closed significantly faster in the OCA group (mean 229.16 [±43.7] seconds versus 258.82 [±51.7] seconds, P = .01). Statistically significant difference in favour of using OCA was found for dehiscence (17.1% versus none in the suture group, P = .025) after 1 week. However, no difference was found for wound dehiscence after 1 month. OCA and suture groups did not differ significantly on patient satisfaction. There were no differences in the percentage of wounds achieving optimal scores on the HWES (suture 85.7% versus OCA 74.2%, P = .169). Nerveless, wound evolution was judged to be significantly better in the OCA group using POSAS. Patients' median POSAS was 9.45 (6-11) and 11.43 (10-13) in the OCA and suture groups, respectively (P = .005), and surgeon's median POSAS was 9.42 (6-11) and 11.48 (10-13) in the OCA and suture groups, respectively (P = .006). N-butyl-cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive is an acceptable technique for the closure of laparoscopic wounds with less operative time, and cosmetic results are comparable to suturing.
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cyanoacrylate; healing; resorbable threads; surgical wound; sutures; tissue adhesives

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31854119      PMCID: PMC7949269          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  14 in total

1.  A randomised clinical trial to compare octyl cyanoacrylate with absorbable monofilament sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions.

Authors:  Yacine Ben Safta; Mohamed Maatouk; Mohamed T Bouzidi; Nabil Sakly; Aymen Mabrouk; Marwa Bouafif; Sarra Sghaier; Hamida Maghraoui; Chadli Dziri; Mounir Ben Moussa
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Randomized clinical trial of a new cyanoacrylate flexible tissue adhesive (Adhflex) for repairing surgical wounds.

Authors:  José M Lloris-Carsí; Jaime Ballester-Álvaro; Carlos Barrios; Cristobal Zaragozá-Fernández; Carlos Gómez-De la Cruz; Chelo González-Cuartero; Beatriz Prieto-Moure; Dolores Cejalvo-Lapeña
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 3.  Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.

Authors:  Paul Coulthard; Marco Esposito; Helen V Worthington; Maarten van der Elst; Oscar J F van Waes; James Darcey
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-05-12

4.  A prospective randomized trial comparing 2-octyl cyanoacrylate to conventional suturing in closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy incisions.

Authors:  Navid Jallali; Amyn Haji; Christopher J E Watson
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 5.  Meta-analysis of skin adhesives versus sutures in closure of laparoscopic port-site wounds.

Authors:  Muhammad S Sajid; Mohammed R Siddiqui; Munir A Khan; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Octylcyanoacrylate skin closure in laparoscopy.

Authors:  Michael J Sebesta; Jay T Bishoff
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Randomized study of the effectiveness of closing laparoscopic trocar wounds with octylcyanoacrylate, adhesive papertape or poliglecaprone.

Authors:  S Maartense; W A Bemelman; M S Dunker; C de Lint; E G J M Pierik; O R C Busch; D J Gouma
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Wound registry: development and validation.

Authors:  J E Hollander; A J Singer; S Valentine; M C Henry
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Cosmetic outcome of skin adhesives versus transcutaneous sutures in laparoscopic port-site wounds: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Olaf Buchweitz; Christian Frye; Claus Peter Moeller; Wolfgang Nugent; Eckart Krueger; Andreas Nugent; Peter Biel; Sven Juergens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  LiquiBand® Surgical S topical adhesive versus sutures for the closure of laparoscopic wounds. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Haider Jan; Natasha Waters; Pat Haines; Andrew Kent
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2013-07-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  A randomised clinical trial to compare octyl cyanoacrylate with absorbable monofilament sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions.

Authors:  Yacine Ben Safta; Mohamed Maatouk; Mohamed T Bouzidi; Nabil Sakly; Aymen Mabrouk; Marwa Bouafif; Sarra Sghaier; Hamida Maghraoui; Chadli Dziri; Mounir Ben Moussa
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  To stitch or not to stitch: the skin closure of laparoscopic port sites, a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucy P Aitchison; Andy Z L Chen; Clare Toms; Charbel Sandroussi; David A Yeo; Daniel Steffens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.453

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.