Literature DB >> 31853461

Learning-based deformable image registration: effect of statistical mismatch between train and test images.

Michael D Ketcha1, Tharindu De Silva1, Runze Han1, Ali Uneri1, Sebastian Vogt2, Gerhard Kleinszig2, Jeffrey H Siewerdsen1.   

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) offer a promising means to achieve fast deformable image registration with accuracy comparable to conventional, physics-based methods. A persistent question with CNN methods, however, is whether they will be able to generalize to data outside of the training set. We investigated this question of mismatch between train and test data with respect to first- and second-order image statistics (e.g., spatial resolution, image noise, and power spectrum). A UNet-based architecture was built and trained on simulated CT images for various conditions of image noise (dose), spatial resolution, and deformation magnitude. Target registration error was measured as a function of the difference in statistical properties between the test and training data. Generally, registration error is minimized when the training data exactly match the statistics of the test data; however, networks trained with data exhibiting a diversity in statistical characteristics generalized well across the range of statistical conditions considered. Furthermore, networks trained on simulated image content with first- and second-order statistics selected to match that of real anatomical data were shown to provide reasonable registration performance on real anatomical content, offering potential new means for data augmentation. Characterizing the behavior of a CNN in the presence of statistical mismatch is an important step in understanding how these networks behave when deployed on new, unobserved data. Such characterization can inform decisions on whether retraining is necessary and can guide the data collection and/or augmentation process for training.
© 2019 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Keywords:  convolutional neural networks; deformable image registration; image quality

Year:  2019        PMID: 31853461      PMCID: PMC6916745          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.4.044008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  20 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors.

Authors:  S Richard; J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray; D J Moseley; B Bakhtiar
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A framework for evaluation of deformable image registration spatial accuracy using large landmark point sets.

Authors:  Richard Castillo; Edward Castillo; Rudy Guerra; Valen E Johnson; Travis McPhail; Amit K Garg; Thomas Guerrero
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Symmetric log-domain diffeomorphic Registration: a demons-based approach.

Authors:  Tom Vercauteren; Xavier Pennec; Aymeric Perchant; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

5.  Adversarial learning for mono- or multi-modal registration.

Authors:  Jingfan Fan; Xiaohuan Cao; Qian Wang; Pew-Thian Yap; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Spatiotemporal motion estimation for respiratory-correlated imaging of the lungs.

Authors:  Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Simon Rit; Jan Kybic; Patrick Clarysse; David Sarrut
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Pulmonary CT Registration Through Supervised Learning With Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Koen A J Eppenhof; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  A new 2.5D representation for lymph node detection using random sets of deep convolutional neural network observations.

Authors:  Holger R Roth; Le Lu; Ari Seff; Kevin M Cherry; Joanne Hoffman; Shijun Wang; Jiamin Liu; Evrim Turkbey; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

9.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Weakly-supervised convolutional neural networks for multimodal image registration.

Authors:  Yipeng Hu; Marc Modat; Eli Gibson; Wenqi Li; Nooshin Ghavami; Ester Bonmati; Guotai Wang; Steven Bandula; Caroline M Moore; Mark Emberton; Sébastien Ourselin; J Alison Noble; Dean C Barratt; Tom Vercauteren
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 8.545

View more
  2 in total

1.  Deep Learning Based Joint PET Image Reconstruction and Motion Estimation.

Authors:  Tiantian Li; Mengxi Zhang; Wenyuan Qi; Evren Asma; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 11.037

2.  Fast contour propagation for MR-guided prostate radiotherapy using convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  K A J Eppenhof; M Maspero; M H F Savenije; J C J de Boer; J R N van der Voort van Zyp; B W Raaymakers; A J E Raaijmakers; M Veta; C A T van den Berg; J P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.