Ruth Ann Marrie1, Leanne Kosowan2, Carole Taylor3, Alexander Singer2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Canada. 2. Department of Family Medicine, University of Manitoba, Canada. 3. Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, University of Manitoba, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We validated a case definition for multiple sclerosis using a clinical cohort linked with the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network of the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, and applied this definition to describe multiple sclerosis epidemiology using the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network repository. METHODS: We developed candidate case definitions for multiple sclerosis in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network using diagnoses and medications. We compared these case definitions to multiple sclerosis diagnoses identified by applying a validated definition to population-based administrative data (reference standard 1) and multiple sclerosis diagnoses recorded by the provincial Multiple Sclerosis Clinic (reference standard 2) using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. We applied the preferred case definition to the national Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network dataset. RESULTS: The Manitoba Primary Care Research Network included 160,904 patients. The preferred case definition required ≥2 billing records for multiple sclerosis within 2 years or multiple sclerosis listed as a health condition or ≥1 multiple sclerosis-specific prescription. This definition had a low sensitivity versus administrative (44.25%) and clinic datasets (53.41%) but high specificity versus administrative data (99.95%). Specificity was lower versus clinic data (71.43%), but the positive predictive value was high. CONCLUSION: We developed a case definition for multiple sclerosis that can be applied to the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network dataset for studies examining primary care of persons with multiple sclerosis.
BACKGROUND: We validated a case definition for multiple sclerosis using a clinical cohort linked with the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network of the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network, and applied this definition to describe multiple sclerosis epidemiology using the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network repository. METHODS: We developed candidate case definitions for multiple sclerosis in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network using diagnoses and medications. We compared these case definitions to multiple sclerosis diagnoses identified by applying a validated definition to population-based administrative data (reference standard 1) and multiple sclerosis diagnoses recorded by the provincial Multiple Sclerosis Clinic (reference standard 2) using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. We applied the preferred case definition to the national Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network dataset. RESULTS: The Manitoba Primary Care Research Network included 160,904 patients. The preferred case definition required ≥2 billing records for multiple sclerosis within 2 years or multiple sclerosis listed as a health condition or ≥1 multiple sclerosis-specific prescription. This definition had a low sensitivity versus administrative (44.25%) and clinic datasets (53.41%) but high specificity versus administrative data (99.95%). Specificity was lower versus clinic data (71.43%), but the positive predictive value was high. CONCLUSION: We developed a case definition for multiple sclerosis that can be applied to the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network dataset for studies examining primary care of persons with multiple sclerosis.
Authors: Stephanie Garies; Richard Birtwhistle; Neil Drummond; John Queenan; Tyler Williamson Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Tyler Williamson; Michael E Green; Richard Birtwhistle; Shahriar Khan; Stephanie Garies; Sabrina T Wong; Nandini Natarajan; Donna Manca; Neil Drummond Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Alan J Thompson; Brenda L Banwell; Frederik Barkhof; William M Carroll; Timothy Coetzee; Giancarlo Comi; Jorge Correale; Franz Fazekas; Massimo Filippi; Mark S Freedman; Kazuo Fujihara; Steven L Galetta; Hans Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Ruth Ann Marrie; Aaron E Miller; David H Miller; Xavier Montalban; Ellen M Mowry; Per Soelberg Sorensen; Mar Tintoré; Anthony L Traboulsee; Maria Trojano; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Sandra Vukusic; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian G Weinshenker; Stephen C Reingold; Jeffrey A Cohen Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Gilles Edan; Massimo Filippi; Hans-Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Luanne M Metz; Henry F McFarland; Paul W O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Brian G Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Brenda Banwell; Michel Clanet; Jeffrey A Cohen; Massimo Filippi; Kazuo Fujihara; Eva Havrdova; Michael Hutchinson; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Xavier Montalban; Paul O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Emmanuelle Waubant; Brian Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Ruth Ann Marrie; Stephen Reingold; Jeffrey Cohen; Olaf Stuve; Maria Trojano; Per Soelberg Sorensen; Gary Cutter; Nadia Reider Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2015-01-12 Impact factor: 6.312