Literature DB >> 31851461

Upper urinary tract stone compositions: the role of age and gender.

Shu Wang1,2, Yitian Zhang3, Xin Zhang1, Yuzhe Tang1, Jianxing Li1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the compositions of upper urinary tract stones and investigate their distributions in different gender and age groups.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with upper urinary tract stone disease between December 2014 and March 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient's age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, stone event characteristics, and compositions were collected, and proportions of stone components in different gender and age groups were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 1532 stone analyses were performed (992 from males and 540 from females). The mean age was younger in males (p<0.001). Males included more cases with larger BMI, hyperuricemia, and obesity, while females had more urinary tract infections. Multiple components were present in 61.8% of stones. Calcium oxalate (CaOx) (67.0%) was the most common component, followed by uric acid (UA) (11.8%), infection stone (11.4%), calcium phosphate (CaP) (8.0%), cystine (1.1%), brushite (0.4%), and 2,8-dihydroxyadenine (0.2%). Men contributed with more CaOx stones than women at age 30-49 years (all p<0.01) and more UA stones at 30-59 years (all p<0.05). Women contributed with more infection stones than men in age groups 30-49 and 60-69 years (all p<0.05), and more CaP stones at 30-49 years. The prevalence peak was 50-59 years in men and 60-69 years in women. Both genders had the lowest prevalence in adolescence. Prevalence of UA stones increased while that of infection stones decreased with aging in both genders.
CONCLUSIONS: Age and sex had a strong association with distribution of stone compositions in this Chinese cohort. Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Groups; Gender Identity; Urinary Calculi

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31851461      PMCID: PMC6968895          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of urolithiasis is increasing in both developed and developing countries. Studies have demonstrated that ethnicity, geographic region, and living conditions could have an infl uence on stone formation (1). A recent study based on the United States population demonstrated that demographic factors, especially gender and age, had potential effects on stone composition, reporting that younger women had more hydroapatite stones, whereas older individuals were more susceptible to uric acid stones (2). Other studies from Europe have confi rmed a higher prevalence of uric acid stone formation in the older population (3, 4). However, most of these studies were from Western countries and focused on Caucasians. Relatively little has been reported about the function of age and gender on stone composition in the Chinese population, and these published studies were conducted in local hospitals in southern and eastern areas. As one of the largest stone management institutes in northern China, we reviewed a large cohort of stone analysis reports from the last 3 years and investigated the possible association of age and gender with stone composition from an epidemiological perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data collection

Patients diagnosed with upper urinary stone disease in Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital from December 2014 to March 2018 were included. Only data from patients whose stones were retrieved intraoperatively (ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy) and sent for analysis were collected. Patient's demographic information such as age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and comorbidities were gathered. We also included history of lithotripsy and urinary tract infection (UTI), stone location, surgical approaches for stone acquisition, and stone composition for evaluation of stone episodes.

Stone composition analysis

All stone samples gathered from the operation were analyzed in the stone analysis laboratory by infrared spectroscopy. After the specimens were washed, dried, and pulverized, 1mg was mixed with 100-200mg of potassium bromide into a uniform powder, and then laminated into a test slice to be placed in an infrared spectrum automatic analysis system for detection. The principal component of the stone was recorded, the classification criteria for which were as follows (2, 5, 6): calcium oxalate (CaOx) stone refers to that with any kind of CaOx >50%; calcium phosphate (CaP) stone contains >50% CaP; infection stone contains >10% magnesium ammonium phosphate or ammonium urate; uric acid (UA) stone contains >50% UA; brushite, cystine, and other rare compositions. For example, if the stone was composed of 40% calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), 30% calcium oxalate dehydrate (COD), and 30% CaP, it would be considered as a CaOx stone. If the sample was found to consist of 20% magnesium ammonium phosphate, 60% CaP, and 20% COM, it would be classified as an infection stone.

STATISTICAL METHODS

Patients were divided into nine age groups by 10-year intervals. The prevalence of stone components was evaluated by two parameters: proportion and the prevalence ratio adjusted by the population of China census in 2017. The prevalence of stone in females at age 0-9 years was chosen as the reference. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS 22.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The proportions of categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. Uni-and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors contributing to stone composition conversion. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Between December 2014 and March 2018, 1532 stone analyses were performed, 992 of which were from males and 540 from females. The mean age was younger in males than in females (45.9 vs. 50.0 years, p <0.001). Males included more cases with larger BMI, hyperuricemia, and obesity (BMI ≥30kg/m2), while females had more UTIs (Table-1). More kidney stones and percutaneous nephrolithotomies (PCNL) were seen in females (p <0.001). A total of 948 (61.8%) stones were composed of multiple elements, to which women contributed much more than males (70.9% vs. 57.0%, p <0.001). CaOx (67.0%) was the most common component, followed by UA (11.8%), infection stone (11.4%), CaP (8.0%), cystine (1.1%), brushite (0.4%), and 2, 8-dihydroxyadenine (0.2%). The four most common stone compositions in men were CaOx stone (69.8%), UA stone (13.8%), infection stone (8.3%), and CaP stone (6.5%), while in women they were CaOx stone (62.0%), infection stone (17.1%), CaP stone (10.9%), and UA stone (8.1%) (Figure-1). The proportions of CaOx (p=0.002) and UA (p=0.002) were much higher in men than in women, whereas the proportions of infection stone (p <0.001) and CaP (p=0.002) were much higher in women.
Table 1

Characteristics of patients and stone compositions stratified by gender.

ParametersTotal number N=1532Stones from Males N=992Stones from Females N=540p-value
Age (year, mean±SD)47.4±16.445.9±17.150.0±14.7<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)25.9±3.427.4±3.224.9±3.50.011
Comorbidities
Hypertension329 (21.5%)219 (22.1%)110 (20.4%)0.473
Diabetes206 (13.4%)128 (12.9%)78 (14.4%)0.398
Hyperuricemia213 (13.9%)151 (15.2%)62 (11.5%)0.043
Obesity (BMI .30kg/m2)277 (18.1%)200 (20.1%)77 (14.3%)0.004
History of lithotripsy
No952 (62.1%)607 (61.2%)345 (63.9)0.298
ESWL241 (15.7%)152 (15.3%)89 (16.5%)0.552
Ureteroscopy153 (10.0%)95 (9.6%)58 (10.7%)0.468
PCNL214 (14.0%)138 (13.9%)76 (14.1%)0.930
Open or laparoscopic nephrolithotomy55 (3.6%)41 (4.1%)14 (2.6%)0.122
Urinary tract infection547 (35.7%)336 (33.9%)211 (39.1%)0.042
Episode
First866 (56.5%)555 (55.9%)311 (57.6%)0.535
Recurrent666 (43.5%)437 (44.1%)229 (42.4%)
Stone location
Kidney1128 (73.6%)768 (77.4%)460 (85.2%)<0.001
Ureter304 (26.4%)224 (22.6%)80 (14.8%)
Surgery of stone acquisition
Ureteroscopy722 (47.1%)493 (49.7%)229 (42.4%)0.006
PCNL810 (52.9%)499 (50.3%)311 (57.6%)
Composition
Single584 (38.2%)427 (43.0%)157 (29.1%)<0.001
Mixed948 (61.8%)565 (57.0%)383 (70.9%)
Stone compositions
Calcium oxalate1027 (67.0%)692 (69.8%)335 (62.0%)0.001
Infection stone175 (11.4%)82 (8.3%)93 (17.2%)<0.001
Calcium phosphate123 (8.0%)64 (6.5%)59 (10.9%)0.002
Uric acid181 (11.8%)137 (13.8%)44 (8.1%)0.001
Cystine17 (1.1%)10 (1.0%)7 (1.3%)/
2.8-Dihydroxyadenine3 (0.2%)3 (0.3%)0/
Brushite6 (0.4%)4 (0.4%)2 (0.4%)/
Figure 1

Proportions of stone compositions in different age groups and genders.

The age-specific prevalence ratios showed that the lowest prevalence for both males and females was in their adolescence, and the peak of prevalence was observed during the age of 50-59 years in men and 60-69 years in women (Table-2). Men presented more CaOx stones than women in the 30-49 years (all p <0.05), and more UA stones at age 30-59 years (p <0.05 for all). Women accounted for more infection stones than men between the ages of 30-49 and 60-69 years (all p <0.05), and more CaP stones at age 30-49 years (Table-3). The prevalence of UA stones was higher in both genders after their 40s.
Table 2

Age-specific prevalence ratios adjusted by the population of China census in 2017.

Age Groups (years)Number of PatientsPopulation Percentage (Vintage 2017)M/F Population RatioAge-specific Incidence Ratio
MFMFMF
0-947 (3.1%)7 (0.5%)6.3%5.5%1.155.861 (Ref.)*
10-1915 (1.0%)5 (0.3%)5.8%5%1.162.030.79
20-2981 (5.3%)31 (2.0%)8.3%7.5%1.117.673.25
30-39182 (11.9%)87 (5.7%)7.6%7.1%1.0718.829.63
40-49233 (15.2%)104 (6.8%)8.6%8.2%1.0521.299.97
50-59215 (14.0%)154 (10.1%)7.1%6.9%1.0323.7917.54
60-69150 (9.8%)114 (7.4%)5%5%1.0023.5717.91
70-7955 (3.6%)31 (2.0%)2.1%2.2%0.9520.5811.07
≥8014 (0.9%)7 (0.5%)0.5%1%0.8013.755.5
Total992 (64.8%)540 (35.2%)51.6%48.4%1.0715.118.77

Reference: The prevalence of stone in females in age 0-9 years.

Table 3

Proportions of different stone compositions stratified by age groups.

Total0-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-79≥80
Calcium oxalate102729 (2.8%)10 (1.0%)80 (7.8%)175 (17.0%)225 (21.9%)255 (24.8%)179 (17.4%)56 (5.5%)18 (1.8%)
Male69225 (3.6%)8 (1.2%)60 (8.7%)132 (19.1%)165 (23.8%)149 (21.5%)107 (15.5%)34 (8.1%)12 (1.7%)
Female3354 (1.2%)2 (0.6%)20 (6.0%)43 (12.8%)60 (17.9%)106 (31.6%)72 (21.5%)22 (6.6%)6 (1.8%)
p-value0.5850.50.316<0.0010.0180.9230.1590.3930.753
Calcium phosphate1234 (3.3%)2 (1.6%)7 (5.7%)24 (19.5%)29 (23.6%)31 (25.2%)16 (13.0%)10 (8.1%)0
Male644 (6.3%)2 (3.1%)6 (9.4%)9 (14.1%)14 (21.9%)13 (20.3%)7 (10.9%)9 (14.1%)0
Female59001 (1.7%)15 (25.4%)15 (25.4%)18 (30.5%)9 (15.3%)1 (1.7%)0
p-value0.5640.5530.3740.0010.0110.0540.2760.064/
Uric acid1811 (0.6%)3 (1.7%)4 (2.2%)28 (15.5%)35 (19.3%)52 (28.7%)43 (23.8%)12 (6.6%)3 (1.7%)
Male1371 (0.7%)1 (0.7%)2 (1.5%)25 (18.2%)31 (22.6%)40 (29.2%)29 (21.2%)6 (4.4%)2 (1.5%)
Female4402 (4.5%)2 (4.5%)3 (6.8%)4 (9.1%)12 (27.3%)14 (31.8%)6 (13.6%)1 (2.3%)
p-value0.870.140.3060.010.0090.0030.1240.2210.726
Infection stone17514 (8.0%)2 (1.1%)15 (8.6%)39 (22.3%)47 (26.9%)25 (14.3%)25 (14.3%)8 (4.6%)0
Male8212 (14.6%)2 (2.4%)8 (9.8%)15 (18.3%)22 (26.8%)11 (13.4%)6 (7.3%)6 (7.3%)0
Female932 (2.2%)07 (7.5%)24 (25.8%)25 (25.9%)14 (15.1%)19 (20.4%)2 (2.2%)0
p-value0.5910.5530.076<0.001<0.0010.134<0.0010.396/
Others* 266 (23.1%)3 (11.5%)6 (23.1%)3 (11.5%)1 (3.8%)6 (23.1%)1 (3.8%)00
Male175 (29.4%)2 (11.8%)5 (29.4%)1 (5.9%)1 (5.9%)2 (11.8%)1 (5.9%)00
Female91 (11.1%)1 (11.1%)1 (11.1%)2 (22.2%)04 (44.4%)000

Others included cystine stone, 2, 8-dihydroxyadenine, and brushite.

Reference: The prevalence of stone in females in age 0-9 years. Others included cystine stone, 2, 8-dihydroxyadenine, and brushite. We further analyzed stone conversions in different episodes. A total of 118 patients with two stone episodes and surgical removal of stones were identified in our center, of whom 48 (40.7%) had stone conversions in the second episode. Multivariate analysis showed that only CaP in the first episode (OR 14.178, 95%CI 2.655-75.702, p=0.002) was associated with stone conversion in the second episode, after controlling for age, gender, and the procedure for the first episode (Supplementary Tables).

DISCUSSION

Urinary stone disease is a common disorder worldwide, causing severe socioeconomic and healthcare burden. Approximately 1 in 11 people in the United States will be affected by urinary stones during their lifetime (7). The incidence of urolithiasis in China has been increasing steadily during the last 20 years, mainly because of changing of lifestyles factors, especially diet (8). The most recent nationwide study revealed that about 1 in 17 adults in China has renal stones (9). Urolithiasis is reported to be a male-dominant disease with an estimated male-to-female ratio ranging from 1.7:1 to 3:1 (10–12). We also observed a male dominance pattern with a ratio of 1.8 in our study. Stone compositions differed significantly between genders. Men presented more CaOx and UA stones than women, consistent with recent studies in other parts of China (13, 14). Males had a tendency to consume more animal meat and proteins, thus developing oversaturated CaOx and UA in the urine (15). It is worth noting that males had more cases with larger BMI, hyperuricemia, and obesity in our study population, which might be one reason for such a pattern. The prevalence of infection stones among women in our study was two times of that in men (17.22% vs. 8.27%). Women are known to be at higher risk of developing UTIs, which in turn will elevate urinary pH and facilitate the growth of organisms containing urease (16). Younger females are observed to possess a higher urine pH (14), which could explain why in our study the prevalence of infectious stones was higher in women aged 30-49 years and lower in older age groups. Overall, the rate of infectious stones observed in our center was much higher than in any other centers in China. As a tertiary hospital, our institution manages more complex stone cases with severe infection and staghorn stones, which may lead to a selection bias. CaP, the second most common stone component in females, is associated with renal acidification defects, calcium or phosphate metabolic disturbance, and UTI (17). The theory that CaP is formed in alkaline urine (18) could support our finding of the disparity between genders because women generally possess urine of higher pH. We observed component discrepancies among different age groups. Men submitted more CaOx stones than women at age 30-49 years, more UA stones at age 30-59 years, fewer infection stones at age 30-59 years, and fewer CaP stones at age 30-49 years. Although CaOx was the most common component in both genders, peaking at 30-69 years, differences have been observed between continents, with CaOx peaking at 40-50 years of age in Europe and 16-39 years in northern Africa. Wu et al. reported a peak age for CaOx stones at 19-40 years in southern China (13), whereas Yang et al. reported a prevalence peak of 30-50 years in eastern China (14). Ethnicity, different dietary preferences, and population composition may contribute collectively to create such disparity. UA has been reported to have increased dramatically in recent years. Wu et al. reported that compared with 2003-2007, the number of UA stones in 2008-2012 doubled (3.83% vs. 6.94%) (13). In our study, UA contributed to 11.8% of all stones, which was almost the same as that reported by a recent study in China in 2019, with a UA stone prevalence of 11.1% (9). We also found that the prevalence of UA stones slowly increased among both genders with aging (2). UA stones have a close association with metabolic syndrome and renal insufficiency, which are more prevalent in older people than in the younger generation (19). Increased acidic urine observed in elderly patients can lead to renal proximal tubular injury and impaired tubular alkalization (20), predisposing older people to UA stones. Studies have demonstrated that the metabolic changes after the menopause might have an influence on urine components, increasing the risk of stone formation in this population. Prochaska et al. reported a higher risk of renal stones in post-menopausal women (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.46) (21). Zhao et al. demonstrated that postmenopausal women were predisposed to urinary stones with lower blood estrogen (22), and Heller et al. reported that postmenopausal women who were treated with estrogen had lower 24h calcium excretion and CaOx saturation (23). In our study, we did observe an increasing prevalence of stone disease in women after their 50s. As women reached their 70s and 80s the proportions of stone components become similar to those of men, in another way supporting the notion that the menopause might have an influence on stone formation. Based on our data, we were unable to conclude whether the menopause is an independent risk factor for stone formation, since details such as menstrual status, level of serum estrogen, urine metabolic analysis, and lifestyle and dietary changes in older females were not available in our study population. Generally, the prevalence of urinary stones in children is much lower than that in adults, with reported rates of 2% to 5% (24). However, stone formation can precede a high rate of recurrence and considerable morbidity in children. In our study, incidences for both genders were relatively high in their first decade and decreased as they entered adolescence. Genetic and metabolic disorders are common in children with urinary stone diseases, with hypercalciuria and hypocitraturia being the most prevalent (24). In a study conducted in southern China, stones from 382 children included 78.8% CaOx, 10.7% infection stones, 9.4% cystine, and 1.1% UA, of which 97.5% of the patients manifested as low citrate (25). Differences have been observed among different areas within China. One study from eastern China reported a relatively high rate of CaOx and cystine stones, and a low rate of struvite stones in children (26), while a study in the northwest border region reported ammonium urate as the dominant stone component in the whole population (27). An early study in Argentina reported that 84.4% of the children with urinary stone disease had metabolic abnormalities, with hypercalciuria and hypocitraturia being the two major risk factors (24). Twenty-four-hour urine analysis and genetic tests are recommended strongly for children with early onset of urinary stone disease to evaluate possible metabolic and genetic disorders and target the treatment to reduce recurrence (28). Drug-and food-induced urinary tract stones are much more common in children. In 2008, China experienced an event of melamine contamination of powdered-milk formula for infants (29). When the concentration of melamine from the formula was sufficiently high in the urine, it easily formed crystals or stones in the infants because of its low solubility (30). The stones analyzed during this crisis were proved to be composed of uric acid dihydrate and ammonium urate (26). It is incumbent on urologists to apply the new knowledge of such rare etiology to the improvement of medical care treatment of children. The present study was one of the very few that investigated the effects of age and gender on stone compositions among the Chinese population. However, some limitations are apparent. First, although we compared the prevalence ratios between age groups adjusted by the population proportions, the actual prevalence of the urinary stone disease in the real world could not be calculated because the data were gathered from patients with urolithiasis. Second, all stone samples were retrieved from operations, leading to a bias against the existence of an unknown number of patients with asymptomatic stones or experiencing spontaneous stone passage away from the hospital. Third, our department admitted mainly adult patients, which could also introduce bias regarding the evaluation of children. Lastly, because of the retrospective study design, we were unable to gather information such as 24-hour urine analysis. It may be concluded that age and gender represent the epidemiological features, not the direct functional factor. Further well-designed multicenter studies are needed to better elucidate the mechanisms behind these differences.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study presented an analysis of stone compositions in a large population in northern China. Significant disparities of stone compositions existed among different genders and ages. Overall, males submitted more CaOx and UA stones whereas females were susceptible to CaP and infectious stones. Incidence of UA stones increased with aging while that of infection stones decreased. The underlying mechanism, including metabolic differences and the function of estrogen, needs to be investigated in the future.

ETHICAL APPROVAL

The protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee.
Supplementary Table 1

Characteristics of patients with or without stone conversions in two episodes.

VariablesTotal number N=118Conversion N=43No conversion N=75P-value
Gender
Male68 (57.6%)22 (51.2%)46 (61.3%)0.282
Female50 (42.4%)21 (48.8%)29 (38.7%)
Age (year, mean±SD)47.3±14.746.7±15.547.7±14.20.617
Prior procedure (first of the two episodes)
Ureteroscopy56 (47.5%)20 (46.5%)36 (48.0%)0.876
PCNL62 (52.5%)23 (53.5%)39 (52.0%)
Compositions (first of the two episodes)
Calcium oxalate61 (51.7%)17 (39.5%)44 (58.7%)0.004
Infectious stone24 (20.3%)10 (23.2%)14 (18.7%)0.551
Calcium phosphate13 (11.0%)11 (25.6%)2 (2.7%)<0.001
Uric acid14 (11.9%)3 (7.0%)11 (14.7%)0.214
Cystine3 (2.5%)1 (2.3%)2 (2.7%)/
2.8-Dihydroxyadenine1 (0.8%)01 (1.3%)/
Brushite2 (1.7%)1 (2.3%)1 (1.3%)/
Supplementary Table 2

Multivariate analysis of the predictors for stone composition conversion.

VariablesMultivariate
VariablesOdds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)p-valueOdds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)p-value
Gender
Male11
Female1.514 (0.710-3.229)0.2831.205 (0.526-2.760)0.659
Age (year)
<4011
40-700.690 (0.294-1.614)0.3920.651 (0.256-1.654)0.367
>700.436 (0.041-4.689)0.4930.642 (0.055-7.498)0.724
Prior procedure (first of the two episodes)
Ureteroscopy11
PCNL0.803 (0.379-1.701)0.5661.081 (0.387-3.014)0.882
Compositions (first of the two episodes)
Calcium oxalate11
Infectious stone1.849 (0.690-4.955)0.2221.629 (0.518-5.121)0.404
Calcium phosphate14.235 (2.853-71.020)0.00114.178 (2.655-75.702)0.002
Uric acid0.706 (0.175-2.845)0.6240.708 (0.173-2.901)0.631
Cystine1.294 (0.110-15.221)0.8381.282 (0.102-16.096)0.847
2.8-Dihydroxyadenine0.0001.0000.0001.000
Brushite2.588 (0.153-43.760)0.5102.327 (0.129-41.841)0.567
  30 in total

Review 1.  EAU Guidelines on Diagnosis and Conservative Management of Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Composition of urinary tract stones formed by children in two populations in the Uyghur region of China.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Aierken Tuerxun; Hamulati Tusong; Abudukahaer Batuer; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Zhijian Zhao; Zanlin Mai; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.743

3.  Epidemiology of kidney stones in Iceland: a population-based study.

Authors:  Olafur S Indridason; Sigurjon Birgisson; Vidar O Edvardsson; Helgi Sigvaldason; Nikulas Sigfusson; Runolfur Palsson
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006

4.  Stone composition as a function of age and sex.

Authors:  John C Lieske; Andrew D Rule; Amy E Krambeck; James C Williams; Eric J Bergstralh; Ramila A Mehta; Thomas P Moyer
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Temporal trends in the incidence of kidney stone disease.

Authors:  Vidar O Edvardsson; Olafur S Indridason; Gudjon Haraldsson; Olafur Kjartansson; Runolfur Palsson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Urolithiasis through the ages: data on more than 200,000 urinary stone analyses.

Authors:  Thomas Knoll; Anne B Schubert; Dirk Fahlenkamp; Dietrich B Leusmann; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Gernot Schubert
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The status and characteristics of urinary stone composition in China.

Authors:  Zhangqun Ye; Guohua Zeng; Huan Yang; Jianxin Li; Kun Tang; Guomin Wang; Shusheng Wang; Yonggang Yu; Yujie Wang; Tao Zhang; Yongfu Long; Weibin Li; Changmin Wang; Wei Wang; Sihe Gao; Yuxi Shan; Xiaobo Huang; Zhiming Bai; Xiaohan Lin; Yue Cheng; Qinzhang Wang; Zhuoqun Xu; Liping Xie; Jianlin Yuan; Shengqiang Ren; Yuhui Fan; Tiejun Pan; Jing Wang; Xun Li; Xuehua Chen; Xiaojian Gu; Zhaolin Sun; Kefeng Xiao; Jianye Jia; Qinghua Zhang; Gongxian Wang; Ting Sun; Xuedong Li; Changbao Xu; Chuangliang Xu; Guowei Shi; Jiayang He; Leming Song; Guang Sun; Dongwen Wang; Yili Liu; Chunxi Wang; Yi Han; Peiyu Liang; Zhiping Wang; Wei He; Zhiqiang Chen; Jinchun Xing; Hua Xu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  A worldwide food safety concern in 2008--melamine-contaminated infant formula in China caused urinary tract stone in 290,000 children in China.

Authors:  Jun-shi Chen
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 2.628

9.  Effect of renal lipid accumulation on proximal tubule Na+/H+ exchange and ammonium secretion.

Authors:  I Alexandru Bobulescu; Michele Dubree; Jianning Zhang; Paul McLeroy; Orson W Moe
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2008-04-16

10.  Metabolic disturbances in Chinese children with urolithiasis: a single center report.

Authors:  Dong Yang; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Chuangxin Lan; Dong Chen; Kang Chen; Lili Ou; Yang Liu; Shaohong Xu; Guohua Zeng; Ming Lei; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.436

View more
  10 in total

1.  The correlation between demographic factors and upper urinary tract stone composition in the Thai population.

Authors:  Noppon Arunkajohnsak; Tawatchai Taweemonkongsap; Sunai Leewansangtong; Sittiporn Srinualnad; Kantima Jongjitaree; Ekkarin Chotikawanich
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-08-07

2.  Risk factors for urinary infection after retrograde upper urinary lithotripsy: Implication for nursing.

Authors:  Chuan Peng; Zhaozhao Chen; Jun Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Preliminary analysis of serum electrolytes and body mass index in patients with and without urolithiasis.

Authors:  Zaixian Zhang; Qingquan Xu; Xiaobo Huang; Shihe Liu; Chuanyu Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Editorial Comment: Upper urinary tract stone compositions: the role of age and gender.

Authors:  Fábio C M Torricelli
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  A high basal metabolic rate is an independent predictor of stone recurrence in obese patients.

Authors:  Ho Won Kang; Sung Pil Seo; Hee Youn Lee; Kyeong Kim; Yun Sok Ha; Won Tae Kim; Yong June Kim; Seok Joong Yun; Wun Jae Kim; Sang Cheol Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

6.  Preliminary study of prevalence of urolithiasis in North-Eastern city of India.

Authors:  Mohammad Shazib Faridi; Khumukchum Somarendra Singh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-12-31

7.  Study of risk factor of urinary calculi according to the association between stone composition with urine component.

Authors:  Pan Wang; Hongxian Zhang; Jiansuo Zhou; Shangjia Jin; Chong Liu; Boxin Yang; Liyan Cui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Gender Differences in Kidney Stone Disease (KSD): Findings from a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kathryn Gillams; Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Siri Øvereng Juliebø; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  A retrospective study on sex difference in patients with urolithiasis: who is more vulnerable to chronic kidney disease?

Authors:  Tsu-Ming Chien; Yen-Man Lu; Ching-Chia Li; Wen-Jeng Wu; Hsueh-Wei Chang; Yii-Her Chou
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.027

10.  Treatment of renal lower pole stones: an update.

Authors:  Eduardo Mazzucchi; Fernanda C G Berto; John Denstedt; Alexandre Danilovic; Carlos Alfredo Batagello; Fabio C M Torricelli; Fabio C Vicentini; Giovanni S Marchini; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.