Literature DB >> 3185131

A comparison of fast spin echo and gradient field echo sequences.

J A Tkach1, E M Haacke.   

Abstract

Optimal angle, fast repeat time, gradient field echo imaging techniques such as FISP (Fast Imaging with Steady Precession) and FLASH (Fast Low Angle Shot) often fail to discriminate disease from healthy tissue for two main reasons. First, T1 and T2 of the affected tissue may increase such that the ratio of T1 to T2 remains nearly unchanged, hence there is no contrast change with FISP. Second, T2 weighted gradient field echo images suffer severely from T2* signal and resolution loss leading to a reduction in C/N. Although FLASH imaging with two separate angles can, in principle, extract the longer T1 tumors, contrast is often not good. To overcome the inhomogeneity and contrast problems, we have implemented a FAst optimal angle spin-echo sequence with a short TE(FATE). For the first echo, FATE has the same contrast properties as FLASH with a slight decrease in signal intensity. The advantage is that the intensity of the signal does not suffer from T2* signal decay, hence improved contrast and disease detection via T2 weighted FATE images is possible. Contrast-to-noise in lesion detection is also considered for CE FAST (Contrast Enhanced Fast), a T2-weighted version of FISP, and HYBRID.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3185131     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(88)90474-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of left ventricular wall motion, volumes, and ejection fraction by gated myocardial tomography with technetium 99m-labeled tetrofosmin: a comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P Vaduganathan; Z X He; G W Vick; J J Mahmarian; M S Verani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Volumetric measurement of human calf muscle from magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M A Elliott; G A Walter; H Gulish; A S Sadi; D D Lawson; W Jaffe; E K Insko; J S Leigh; K Vandenborne
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  [Contrast in static images in clinical magnetic resonance imaging : Part 1: Contrast properties of tissue].

Authors:  F Schick
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Cartilage imaging at 3.0T with gradient refocused acquisition in the steady-state (GRASS) and IDEAL fat-water separation.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Leo Passov; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Huanzhou Hu; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Quantitative MRI measurement of lung density must account for the change in T(2) (*) with lung inflation.

Authors:  Rebecca J Theilmann; Tatsuya J Arai; Ahsan Samiee; David J Dubowitz; Susan R Hopkins; Richard B Buxton; G Kim Prisk
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Development and validation of 3D MP-SSFP to enable MRI in inhomogeneous magnetic fields.

Authors:  Naoharu Kobayashi; Ben Parkinson; Djaudat Idiyatullin; Gregor Adriany; Sebastian Theilenberg; Christoph Juchem; Michael Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Early myocardial dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice: a study using in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Xichun Yu; Yasvir A Tesiram; Rheal A Towner; Andrew Abbott; Eugene Patterson; Shijun Huang; Marion W Garrett; Suresh Chandrasekaran; Satoshi Matsuzaki; Luke I Szweda; Brian E Gordon; David C Kem
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2007-02-19       Impact factor: 9.951

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.