Anthony E Pusateri1, Ernest E Moore2, Hunter B Moore2, Tuan D Le1, Francis X Guyette3, Michael P Chapman4, Angela Sauaia5, Arsen Ghasabyan2, James Chandler2, Kevin McVaney6, Joshua B Brown7, Brian J Daley8, Richard S Miller9, Brian G Harbrecht10, Jeffrey A Claridge11, Herb A Phelan12, William R Witham13, A Tyler Putnam14, Jason L Sperry7. 1. US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas. 2. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora. 3. Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora. 5. Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora. 7. Division of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 8. Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Knoxville. 9. Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 10. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky. 11. MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 12. Department of Surgery, Parkland Memorial Hospital, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas. 13. Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital, Ft Worth, Texas. 14. Altoona Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Altoona, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
Importance: Both military and civilian clinical practice guidelines include early plasma transfusion to achieve a plasma to red cell ratio approaching 1:1 to 1:2. However, it was not known how early plasma should be given for optimal benefit. Two recent randomized clinical trials were published, with apparently contradictory results. The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) clinical trial showed a nearly 30% reduction in mortality with plasma transfusion in the prehospital environment, while the Control of Major Bleeding After Trauma (COMBAT) clinical trial showed no survival improvement. Objective: To facilitate a post hoc combined analysis of the COMBAT and PAMPer trials to examine questions that could not be answered by either clinical trial alone. We hypothesized that prehospital transport time influenced the effects of prehospital plasma on 28-day mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 626 patients in the 2 clinical trials were included. Patients with trauma and hemorrhagic shock were randomly assigned to receive either standard care or 2 U of thawed plasma followed by standard care in the prehospital environment. Data analysis was performed between September 2018 and January 2019. Interventions: Prehospital transfusion of 2 U of plasma compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: In this post hoc analysis of 626 patients (467 men [74.6%] and 159 women [25.4%]; median [interquartile range] age, 42 [27-57] years) who had trauma with hemorrhagic shock, a Cox regression analysis showed a significant overall survival benefit for plasma (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90; P = .01) after adjustment for injury severity, age, and clinical trial cohort (COMBAT or PAMPer). A significant association with prehospital transport time was detected (from arrival on scene to arrival at the trauma center). Increased mortality was observed in patients in the standard care group when prehospital transport was longer than 20 minutes (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05-4.30; P = .04), while increased mortality was not observed in patients in the prehospital plasma group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.51; P = .46). No serious adverse events were associated with prehospital plasma transfusion. Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that prehospital plasma is associated with a survival benefit when transport times are longer than 20 minutes and that the benefit-risk ratio is favorable for use of prehospital plasma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01838863 (COMBAT) and NCT01818427 (PAMPer).
RCT Entities:
Importance: Both military and civilian clinical practice guidelines include early plasma transfusion to achieve a plasma to red cell ratio approaching 1:1 to 1:2. However, it was not known how early plasma should be given for optimal benefit. Two recent randomized clinical trials were published, with apparently contradictory results. The Prehospital Air Medical Plasma (PAMPer) clinical trial showed a nearly 30% reduction in mortality with plasma transfusion in the prehospital environment, while the Control of Major Bleeding After Trauma (COMBAT) clinical trial showed no survival improvement. Objective: To facilitate a post hoc combined analysis of the COMBAT and PAMPer trials to examine questions that could not be answered by either clinical trial alone. We hypothesized that prehospital transport time influenced the effects of prehospital plasma on 28-day mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 626 patients in the 2 clinical trials were included. Patients with trauma and hemorrhagic shock were randomly assigned to receive either standard care or 2 U of thawed plasma followed by standard care in the prehospital environment. Data analysis was performed between September 2018 and January 2019. Interventions: Prehospital transfusion of 2 U of plasma compared with crystalloid-based resuscitation. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: In this post hoc analysis of 626 patients (467 men [74.6%] and 159 women [25.4%]; median [interquartile range] age, 42 [27-57] years) who had trauma with hemorrhagic shock, a Cox regression analysis showed a significant overall survival benefit for plasma (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90; P = .01) after adjustment for injury severity, age, and clinical trial cohort (COMBAT or PAMPer). A significant association with prehospital transport time was detected (from arrival on scene to arrival at the trauma center). Increased mortality was observed in patients in the standard care group when prehospital transport was longer than 20 minutes (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05-4.30; P = .04), while increased mortality was not observed in patients in the prehospital plasma group (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.40-1.51; P = .46). No serious adverse events were associated with prehospital plasma transfusion. Conclusions and Relevance: These data suggest that prehospital plasma is associated with a survival benefit when transport times are longer than 20 minutes and that the benefit-risk ratio is favorable for use of prehospital plasma. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01838863 (COMBAT) and NCT01818427 (PAMPer).
Authors: Robert F Malsby; Jose Quesada; Nicole Powell-Dunford; Ren Kinoshita; John Kurtz; William Gehlen; Colleen Adams; Dustin Martin; Stacy Shackelford Journal: Mil Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Joost H Peters; Pascal S H Smulders; Xavier R J Moors; Stef J M Bouman; Claartje M E M Meijs; Nico Hoogerwerf; Michael J R Edwards Journal: Eur J Emerg Med Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.799
Authors: Jacob Chen; Avi Benov; Roy Nadler; Daniel N Darlington; Andrew P Cap; Ari M Lipsky; Elon Glassberg Journal: Mil Med Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Ernest E Moore; Theresa L Chin; Michael C Chapman; Eduardo Gonzalez; Hunter B Moore; Christopher C Silliman; Kirk C Hansen; Angela Sauaia; Anirban Banerjee Journal: Shock Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Angelo D'Alessandro; Hunter B Moore; Ernest E Moore; Matthew J Wither; Travis Nemkov; Alexander P Morton; Eduardo Gonzalez; Michael P Chapman; Miguel Fragoso; Anne Slaughter; Angela Sauaia; Christopher C Silliman; Kirk C Hansen; Anirban Banerjee Journal: Shock Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Hunter B Moore; Ernest E Moore; Michael P Chapman; Kevin McVaney; Gary Bryskiewicz; Robert Blechar; Theresa Chin; Clay Cothren Burlew; Fredric Pieracci; F Bernadette West; Courtney D Fleming; Arsen Ghasabyan; James Chandler; Christopher C Silliman; Anirban Banerjee; Angela Sauaia Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Joshua B Brown; Mark L Gestring; Francis X Guyette; Matthew R Rosengart; Nicole A Stassen; Raquel M Forsythe; Timothy R Billiar; Andrew B Peitzman; Jason L Sperry Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: François Dépret; Marc Leone; Gary Duclos; Emmanuel Futier; Maxime Montagne; Matthieu Legrand; Bernard Allaouchiche Journal: J Clin Monit Comput Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 2.502
Authors: Hunter B Moore; Matthew T Tessmer; Ernest E Moore; Jason L Sperry; Mitchell J Cohen; Michael P Chapman; Anthony E Pusateri; Francis X Guyette; Joshua B Brown; Matthew D Neal; Brian Zuckerbraun; Angela Sauaia Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Junru Wu; Hamed Moheimani; Shimena Li; Upendra K Kar; Jillian Bonaroti; Richard S Miller; Brian J Daley; Brian G Harbrecht; Jeffrey A Claridge; Danielle S Gruen; Herbert A Phelan; Francis X Guyette; Matthew D Neal; Jishnu Das; Jason L Sperry; Timothy R Billiar Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2022-07-19 Impact factor: 13.787