Literature DB >> 31851144

US Trends of Opioid-use Disorders and Associated Factors Among Hospitalized Patients With Spinal Conditions and Treatment From 2005 to 2014.

Se Won Lee1, Jay Shen2, Sun Jung Kim3, Sung-Youn Chun2, Pearl Kim2, Jahan Riaz4, Ji Won Yoo4, Jinwook Hwang2,5.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Serial cross-sectional study utilizing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005 to 2014.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the trends of opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment and to identify its contributing factors. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The opioid is widely used in chronic spinal conditions, and misuse of prescriptions is the main culprit of the opioid crisis. Cannabis, the most commonly utilized illicit drug, has recently been substituted for opioid despite increasing cannabis-use emergency room visits. There is limited information on opioid-use disorders, the association with cannabis, and other contributing factors.
METHODS: We analyzed the 2005 to 2014 NIS data that identified opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with cervical and lumbar spinal conditions and treatment using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification codes for opioid abuse, dependence, poisoning, and cervical and lumbar spinal diseases and procedures. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was used to quantify trends of opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients. Multilevel and multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine their contributing factors.
RESULTS: The number of hospitalizations with spinal conditions and treatment increased from 2005 to 2011, then decreased between 2011 and 2014 with an overall decrease in length of stay, resulting in the CAGR of -1.60% (P < .001). Almost 3% (2.93%, n = 557,423) of hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment were diagnosed as opioid-use disorders and its CAGR was 6.47% (P < .0001). Opioid-use disorders were associated with cannabis-use disorders (odds ratio 1.714), substance use, mental health condition, younger age, white race, male sex, higher household income, and public insurance or uninsured.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that opioid-use disorders are increasing among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment and associated with several demographic, and socioeconomic factors, including cannabis-use disorders. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31851144      PMCID: PMC6924939          DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.241


Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is the most common reason for opioid prescription in outpatient clinics in the United States.[1] The United States has the highest surgical rate for spinal disorders in the world, and the rate is increasing, despite the similar incidence and prevalence of spinal disorders worldwide.[2-4] Considering that CLBP is the most common reason for prescribed opioids, it is common for CLBP patients to be on opioids before spinal surgery. Chronic opioid use is more common among patients who undergo orthopedic surgeries than among those who undergo other types of surgeries.[5] Retrospective studies have revealed that preoperative opioid use in patients with spinal diseases is associated with increased risks of postoperative opioid use and worse surgical outcomes including a higher rate of repeated surgeries.[6,7] In 2016, >11.5 million people reported misuse of prescription pain medicine[8] and 115 Americans to die every day from an opioid overdose.[9] On October 27, 2017, the president declared the opioid crisis a national public health emergency under section 319 of the Public Health Service Act. This declaration was renewed on October 18, 2018, because of the continued consequences of the opioid epidemic. In effect, the opioid-use disorder has been increasing among the general population with some variance in the rate of opioid-related hospitalization depending on age, ethnicity, geographic location,[10] and household income.[11] However, the study on opioid-use disorders among more vulnerable population such as patients with painful spinal conditions and treatment was limited. Substances abuse and mental health conditions were previously reported to be a contributor to the development of chronic opioid use that begins during the postoperative period.[5,12,13] Cannabis remains the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States with an estimated 22.2 million people using it currently, and an additional 2.4 million people reporting first-time use annually.[14] There were increasing emergency department visits related to cannabis use from 2006 to 2014[15] with marijuana legalization in 33 states and the District of Columbia during the last two decades. Although there is an ongoing debate on whether cannabis is a gateway drug[16] or a substitute for opioid use,[17] little attention about the effects of marijuana legalization on opioid-use disorders among patients with spinal conditions and treatment is rising. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the association of cannabis, mental health conditions, and other substances abuse among patients with painful spinal conditions and treatment. The purpose of our study is two-fold: to examine the temporal trends of opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment in the United States from 2005 to 2014, and to identify contributing factors to the increasing opioid-use diseases within the same period (Summary slide-2, Suppl Tables).

METHODS

Data Source and Study Population

This study was based on the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). NIS is the largest publicly available, all-payer US hospital inpatient dataset. It contains a 20% stratified sample of hospital inpatient stays from across the United States. The dataset captures discharge information from hospital inpatient stays and belongs to the family of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).[18] The NIS can be weighted to generate national estimates. We used a 10-year data from 2005 to 2014. The use of the NIS dataset is entirely anonymous with no risk of a confidentiality breach. An institutional review board approval was waived. We completed a data user agreement with the AHRQ before using the NIS database.

Measures

We identified opioid-use disorders in hospitalized patients with cervical and lumbar spinal conditions and treatment using the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic and procedure codes to identify opioid abuse, dependence or poisoning. (Search terms included “continuous”, “episodic”, “unspecified”; See Table 1 for details.). The term “in remission” was excluded.
TABLE 1

ICD-9-CM Codes Used for Spinal Conditions and Treatment, Opioid, Cannabis, and Substance-use Disorders and Mental Health Conditions

Diagnostic CategoriesICD-9-CM Codes
Lumbar spine
 Disc and spine diseases7213, 72142, 72210, 72251, 72273, 72293, 72402, 72403, 7242, 7243, 7244, 7245, 7246, 72470, 72471, 72479, 7248, 7249, 7265
 Status post-surgery72280, 72283, V454
 Procedure codes301, 302, 309, 31, 8050, 8051, 8052, 8053, 8054, 8059, 8104, 8105, 8106, 8107, 8108, 8130, 8134, 8135, 8136, 8137, 8138, 8139, 8162, 8163, 8164, 8165, 8166, 8451, 8459, 8460, 8464, 8465, 8468, 8469, 8480, 8481, 8482, 8483, 8484, 8485
Cervical spine
 Disc and spine diseases7210, 7211, 7220, 7224, 72271
 Status post-surgery72281, 72291, 7230, 7231, 7232, 7233, 7236, 7237, 7238, 7239
 Procedure codes8101, 8102, 8103, 8131, 8132, 8133, 8461, 8462, 8466
Drugs
 Opioid30400, 30401, 30402, 30403, 30470, 30471, 30472, 30473, 30550, 30551, 30552, 30553, 96500, 96501,96502, 96509, E8500, E8501, E8502, E9350, E9351 E9352
 Marijuana3043, 30430, 30431, 30432, 30433, 30520, 30521, 30522, 30523
 Alcohol30300, 30301, 30302, 30303, 30390, 30391, 30392, 30393, 30500, 30501, 30502, 30503, 9800, 9801, 9802, 9803, 9808, 9809
 Sedative30410, 30411, 30413, 30540, 30541, 30542, 30543, 9670, 9671, 9672, 9673, 9674, 9675, 9676, 9678, 9679, 9680, 9691, 9692, 9693, 9694, 9695, E851, E8521, E8522, E8523, E8524, E8525, E8528, E8529, E8530, E8531, E8532, E8538, E8539, E9370, E9371, E9372, E9379, E9380, E9801, E9802, E9803
 Cocaine30420, 30422, 30423, 30560, 30561, 30562, 30563, 97081, 97089
 Stimulant30440, 30441, 30442, 30443, 30570, 30571, 30572, 30573, 9696, 96970, 96971, 96972, 96973, 96979, 9700, 9701, 9709, E8541, E8542, E8543, E8548, E9404, E9409, E9412
 Hallucinogen30450, 30451, 30452, 30453, 30530, 30531, 30532, 30533, E8541, E8555, E8556, E8558, E8559
 Other30460, 30461, 30462, 30463, 30470, 30471, 30472, 30480, 30481, 30483, 30490, 30491, 30492, 30580, 30581, 30582, 30583, 30590, 30591, 30592, 9690, 96901, 96902, 96903, 96904, 96905, 96909, E8541, E9390, E9391, E9392, E9393, E9394, E9395, E9396, E9897, E9398, E9399
Mental health condition
 Mood disorders29600, 29601, 29602, 29603, 29604, 29605, 29606, 29610, 29611, 29612, 29613, 29614, 29615, 29616, 29620, 29621, 29622, 29623, 29624, 29625, 29625, 29626, 29630, 29631, 29632, 29633, 29634, 29635, 29640, 29641, 29642, 29643, 29644, 29645, 29646, 29650, 29651, 29652, 29653, 2965429655, 29656, 29660, 29661, 29662, 29663, 29664, 29665, 29666, 2967, 29680, 29681, 29682, 29689, 29690, 29699
 Psychosis2970, 2971, 2972, 2973, 2978, 2979, 2980, 2981, 2982, 2983, 2984, 2988
 Anxiety disorders30000, 30001, 30002, 30009, 30010, 30011, 30012, 30013, 30014, 30015, 30016, 30019, 30020, 30021, 30022, 30023, 30029, 3003, 3004, 3005, 3006, 3007, 30081, 30082, 30089
 Personality and other disorders3009, 3030, 30110, 30111, 30112, 30113, 30120, 30121, 30122, 3013, 3014, 30150, 30151, 30159, 3016, 3017, 30181, 30183, 30184, 30189, 3019

ICD-9-CM indicates International Classification of Diseases, 9 Revision, Clinical Modification.

ICD-9-CM Codes Used for Spinal Conditions and Treatment, Opioid, Cannabis, and Substance-use Disorders and Mental Health Conditions ICD-9-CM indicates International Classification of Diseases, 9 Revision, Clinical Modification. Events of interest measured included the annual rate of opioid, cannabis, other substance-use disorders and spinal conditions, and treatment-related hospital discharges. We also measured the annual number of hospitalizations and length of stay. We examined patient characteristics including age, sex, race, primary payer, number of comorbidities, the severity of illness, cannabis use, other substance use, and hospital region (Table 2), as there has been a variation of opioid-related hospitalization based on these factors.[10,11] All-patient refined diagnosis-related group was used to classify the severity of illness (0 [lowest]–4 highest]).[19] A dummy variable was created for the year subset of 2010–2014) for two reasons. First, the CDC designated 2010 as the start of the second wave epidemic era when heroin overdose deaths began to increase sharply.[20] Furthermore, on October 19, 2009, the Department of Justice issued a memo stating that it would not prosecute marijuana users and sellers who complied with state laws for marijuana use.[21]
TABLE 2

Temporal Trends of Hospitalized Patients With Spinal Conditions and Treatment

2005200820112014
VariablesN%N%N%N%
Total weighted N1,370,5991,875,0532,339,6871,997,471
Age group, y
 <3092,2666.7%110,6175.9%128,9835.5%114,6205.7%
 30–39121,5078.9%147,7487.9%177,9037.6%142,3507.1%
 40–49231,91816.9%287,32215.3%331,69614.2%248,02012.4%
 50–59253,20818.5%371,29419.8%495,39021.2%429,65521.5%
 60–69225,86416.5%352,18318.8%474,23820.3%434,73021.8%
 70–79239,55817.5%317,56016.9%391,29516.7%353,16517.7%
 ≥80206,27915.1%288,33015.4%340,18114.5%274,93013.8%
Sex
 Male598,78343.7%822,91443.9%1,044,51944.6%909,37145.5%
 Female771,81656.3%1,052,14056.1%1,295,16755.4%1,088,10154.5%
Race
 Black119,3038.7%177,8379.5%263,78811.3%232,14511.6%
 Hispanic84,5946.2%113,3516.0%163,5197.0%142,8157.1%
 Asian or Pacific Islander16,4601.2%28,3791.5%29,5201.3%30,3601.5%
 Native American/other37,0532.7%56,4493.0%61,2942.6%60,4053.0%
 White1,113,18881.2%1,499,03879.9%1,821,56677.9%1,531,74676.7%
Median household income
 0–25th percentile339,41224.8%497,42226.5%649,60827.8%573,80528.7%
 26th–50th percentile336,44324.5%516,33027.5%574,20824.5%557,85527.9%
 51st–75th percentile360,70126.3%439,74423.5%593,67525.4%464,02523.2%
 76th–100th percentile334,04324.4%421,55722.5%522,19622.3%401,78520.1%
Primary payer
 Medicare651,39247.5%895,04047.7%1,161,72949.7%1,024,57651.3%
 Medicaid127,5199.3%178,3789.5%258,43611.0%277,84013.9%
 Uninsured48,3413.5%72,1033.8%102,6734.4%68,1603.4%
 Other75,7055.5%98,9955.3%115,5674.9%82,9204.2%
 Private insurance467,64234.1%630,53733.6%701,28130.0%543,97627.2%
Number of comorbidities*1.801.532.201.722.481.83
Severity of illness subclass
 APR-DRG 0,1, lowest508,77337.1%587,22931.3%636,32227.2%714,73535.8%
 APR-DRG 2543,60139.7%756,68840.4%955,67340.8%748,56537.5%
 APR-DRG 3232,03116.9%396,03221.1%567,15724.2%424,95021.3%
 APR-DRG 4, highest86,1946.3%135,1057.2%180,5347.7%109,2205.5%
Opioid-use disorders
 Yes56320.4%46,7382.5%77,3963.3%70,0903.5%
 No27,3512.0%1,828,31697.5%2,262,29196.7%1,927,38196.5%
Cannabis-use disorders
 Yes99560.7%17,1590.9%29,7231.3%35,1901.8%
 No1,360,64399.3%1,857,89499.1%2,309,96498.7%1,962,28198.2%
Substance-use disorders
 Yes80,8555.9%124,0596.6%180,3087.7%166,0408.3%
 No1,289,74494.1%1,750,99493.4%2,159,37892.3%1,831,43191.7%
Mental health conditions
 Yes275,21220.1%469,14825.0%665,15628.4%615,55530.8%
 No1,095,38779.9%1,405,90675.0%1,674,53171.6%1,381,91669.2%
Hospital region
 Northeast320,15023.4%407,34321.7%450,21719.2%371,14518.6%
 Midwest248,62218.1%301,84416.1%451,58819.3%440,11522.0%
 South507,39637.0%742,56739.6%940,85640.2%785,25239.3%
 West294,43221.5%423,29922.6%497,02621.2%400,96020.1%

*Mean/SD.

Temporal Trends of Hospitalized Patients With Spinal Conditions and Treatment *Mean/SD.

Statistical Analysis

First, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was used to quantify temporal trends of the annual number of opioids, cannabis, and other substance use-use hospitalizations in patients with spinal diseases. Its statistical significance was tested by Rao-Scott correction for χ2 tests for categorical variables. The CAGR supposes that year A is x and year B is y, and CAGR = (y/x) [1/(B-A)]-1 has been widely used for health care valuation.[22,23] Multilevel and multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between opioid-use disorders and patient demographics, hospital factors, and socioeconomic status. To evaluate the effect of missing data on spine-related hospitalizations, we compared baseline characteristics between the missing and analyzed samples’ characteristics. There were no statistical differences between the baseline characteristics of the selected and missing data. The model was determined to be stable, and the assumption of randomly missing data was found to be reasonable using the observed data. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). All reported P values were 2-tailed and P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Descriptive Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients With Spinal Conditions and Treatment and Opioid-use Disorders

The 2005 to 2014 NIS database contained 382,516,561 hospital inpatient stays. Among the 23,663,307 hospitalizations with cervical and lumbar spinal conditions and treatment, 4,657,522 cases were removed because of missing value in an observation (Figure 1). Among 19,005,785 hospitalizations with spinal conditions and treatment, opioid-use disorders were 2.93% (557,423). Table 2 presents a descriptive analysis of patient and hospital characteristics.
Figure 1

Patient selection process. Note: ∗Weighted indicates survey adjustments to estimate national population estimates.ICD-9-CM indicates International Classification of Diagnosis, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.

Patient selection process. Note: ∗Weighted indicates survey adjustments to estimate national population estimates.ICD-9-CM indicates International Classification of Diagnosis, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.

Trends of Hospitalizations With Spinal Conditions and Treatment and Length of Hospital Stay

Figure 2 presents the temporal trends of hospitalizations with spinal conditions and treatment and the annual average length of hospital stay. The CAGR of these hospitalizations was 4.27% (P < .001; 1,370,599 hospitalizations in 2005 and 1,997,471 hospitalizations in 2014). There were two trends in the annual number of hospitalizations with spinal conditions and treatment: monotonic increase during the period between 2005 and 2011 and decrease during the period between 2011 and 2014. Most patient sociodemographics and hospitalization characteristics were relatively stable during the period observed, as shown in Table 2. We observed overall decreasing trends in the length of hospital stay, with the sharpest decrease from 2010 to 2011. The CAGR of hospital length of stay was −1.60% (P < 0.001).
Figure 2

Annual total numbers of hospitalized patients with cervical and lumbar spinal conditions and treatment (total) and length of hospital stay (LOS).

Annual total numbers of hospitalized patients with cervical and lumbar spinal conditions and treatment (total) and length of hospital stay (LOS).

Trends of Opioid, Cannabis, and Other Substances-use Disorders Among Hospitalized Patients With Spinal Conditions and Treatment

Figure 3 presents the trends of annual rates of opioid, cannabis, and other substance-use disorders among hospitalized patients. We observed an increasing trend in annual rates of all opioid, cannabis, and other substance-use disorders except the rate of other substance-use disorder in 2008. The CAGRs of them were 6.47%, 10.34%, and 3.88%, respectively (all P < 0.001).
Figure 3

Annual trends of opioid, cannabis, and other substance-related disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment from 2005 to 2014. CAGR indicates compound annual growth rate.

Annual trends of opioid, cannabis, and other substance-related disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment from 2005 to 2014. CAGR indicates compound annual growth rate.

Multivariable Analyses of Opioid-use Disorders and Its Associated Factors Among Hospitalized Patients With Spinal Conditions and Treatment

Table 3 shows the relationship between opioid-use disorder and its associated factors based on multivariable analyses. On average, the likelihood of opioid-use disorders increased about 5.2% annually from 2005 to 2014 (odds ratio [OR] 1.052, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.049–1.054). Opioid-use disorders happened over 25% more often among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment during the period from 2010 to 2014 compared from 2005 to 2009 (OR 1.268, 95% CI 1.252–1.284).
TABLE 3

Relationship Between Opioid-use Disorders and Contributing Factors Among Hospitalized Patients With Spinal Conditions and Treatment (Multivariate regression analysis)

Odds ratios95% CIsOdds ratios95% CIs
Year increment (continuous variable)1.0521.0491.054
Year dummy (categorial variable)
 2010–20141.2681.2521.284
 2005–2009Reference
Age group. y
 <30ReferenceReference
 30–390.9960.9721.0210.9970.9731.022
 40–490.7020.6860.7190.7040.6870.721
 50–590.5670.5540.5800.5650.5520.579
 60–690.2910.2830.3000.2900.2820.298
 70–790.1300.1250.1350.1300.1250.135
 ≥800.0630.0600.0660.0630.0600.066
Male sex1.0831.0691.0981.0831.0681.097
Race
 WhiteReferenceReference
 Black0.6010.5870.6150.6000.5870.614
 Hispanic0.6960.6770.7140.6950.6770.714
 Asian or Pacific Islander0.4070.3730.4450.4050.3710.443
 Native American/other0.7650.7350.7960.7650.7350.796
Median household income
 0–25th percentileReferenceReference
 26th–50th percentile1.0040.9871.0211.0010.9841.019
 51st–75th percentile1.0461.0281.0651.0461.0281.065
 76th–100th percentile1.0901.0691.1111.0891.0681.111
Primary payer
 Private insuranceReferenceReference
 Medicare1.6681.6371.6991.6671.6361.698
 Medicaid1.7801.7461.8141.7711.7371.805
 Uninsured1.9651.9182.0141.9631.9162.011
 Other1.1141.0811.1481.1141.0811.148
Number of comorbidities1.0591.0551.0631.0601.0551.064
Severity of illness subclass
 APR-DRG 0,1, lowestReferenceReference
 APR-DRG 21.4461.4221.4701.4461.4231.470
 APR-DRG 31.4731.4431.5041.4631.4331.494
 APR-DRG 4, highest1.3131.2731.3541.3081.2681.349
Cannabis-use disorders
 Yes1.7141.6661.7651.7071.6591.757
 NoReferenceReference
Substance-use disorders
 Yes5.3825.2995.4665.3895.3065.473
 NoReferenceReference
Mental health conditions
 Yes2.2032.1722.2342.1942.1632.225
 NoReferenceReference
Hospital region
 WestReferenceReference
 Northeast0.9830.9651.0020.9870.9681.006
 Midwest0.6440.6310.6580.6430.6290.656
 South0.7560.7420.7690.7550.7420.768

APR-DRG indicates all-patient refined diagnosis-related group; CI, confidence interval.

Relationship Between Opioid-use Disorders and Contributing Factors Among Hospitalized Patients With Spinal Conditions and Treatment (Multivariate regression analysis) APR-DRG indicates all-patient refined diagnosis-related group; CI, confidence interval. Regarding age, opioid-use disorder among hospitalized patients was more common in the younger age group, and monotonically declined as the age increased. Compared to privately insured patients, all other patients were >1.5 times more likely to be diagnosed as opioid abuse, dependence, or poisoning (OR 1.668, 95% CI 1.637–1.699 for Medicare patients; OR 1.780, 95% CI 1.746–1.814 for Medicaid patients; OR 1.965, 95% CI 1.918–2.014 for the uninsured). Regarding cannabis and substance, patients with cannabis and substance-use disorders were more vulnerable to opioid (OR 1.714, 95% CI 1.666–1.765 for cannabis; OR 5.382, 95% CI 5.299–5.466 for other substances) It is not surprising that patients with mental health conditions were more vulnerable to opioid than patients without mental health conditions (OR 2.203, 95% CI 2.172–2.234). Opioids abuse, dependence, or poisoning was more common in the Western and Northeastern region than the Midwestern and Southern region among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment.

DISCUSSION

The present study examined the nationwide temporal trends of opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment. The critical finding is the monotonically increasing pattern of opioid-use disorders (annually 6.47%) as observed in national reports from the CDC and self-report studies of increasing opioid abuse, dependence, or poisoning and treatment utilization patterns in the United States.[8] A growing trend of opioid-use disorder in this study is consistent with the same epidemiologic database of increasing opioid-use hospitalizations among patients with lumbar spinal fusion procedures.[12] Regarding trends of hospitalizations with spinal conditions and treatment, our findings are consistent with those from other studies on decreasing trends of elective lumbar spinal surgeries since 2011.[24] Spinal surgeries are among the most costly procedures in the US health care system.[25] Length of hospital stay decreased during the study period. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services implemented a series of Medicare reform policies linking quality of performance to payment under the umbrella of Affordable Care Act including Hospital Acquired Conditions in 2008, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program in 2012, and spine bundle program in 2013. These policies led to cost containment by reducing hospital length of stay as well as readmission after spinal procedures and surgeries. Besides, the rapid proliferation of ambulatory surgery centers in the 2000s may have contributed to the reduction in the hospital-based elective spinal surgery.[26,27] The effect of this shift of this practice pattern on the increasing trend of increasing opioid-related hospitalizations despite the decreasing hospital stay warrants further investigation beyond the health policy effects.[28]

Age, Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics and Assumption of Purpose of Opioid Abuse, Dependence, or Poisoning

We observed a distinct pattern in the relationship between age and opioid-use disorders. Compared to middle-aged and older adults, young adults (<30 years’ old) are the most vulnerable to opioid, and the risk of opioid-use disorders declines monotonically with progressing age. This finding supports the previous results that young adults are more likely than older adults to use opioids because young adults tend to perceive opioids as low risk, both for prescription and recreational uses.[29] Our findings may suggest illicit use as a potential contributing factor for opioid-use disorders among young adults, although the reason for opioid use was not available in our analysis. It is interesting to see the discordance of the median household income and primary payer in opioid-use disorders. Population with private insurance has the lowest rate, whereas the group with the highest median household income has the highest percentage. It may be secondary to the shift of the insurance carrier regardless of the household income after chronic disabling painful spinal conditions with opioid abuse, dependence, or poisoning. This fact warrants further investigation as this report lacked the longitudinal socioeconomic information of the individuals.

Cannabis, Other Substances, and Mental Health Conditions as Associated Factors of Opioid-use Disorders

Cannabis legalization during the last 18 years has led to a broader spectrum of medicinal as well as recreational use. Sound production is more efficient than black market production, and falling cannabis prices have increased the accessibility of use among young adults.[30] Although there is an ongoing debate about whether cannabis is a gateway drug, our findings imply that cannabis use and opioid use can mutually increase each other, based on the reports from survey[31] and claim data.[15] Continuous use of cannabis, either medicinally or recreationally, may lead to increased dependence and higher tolerance levels. Therefore, it is possible that medical and recreational use of marijuana might lead to more detrimental health outcomes such as cannabis abuse or dependence. Because of the nature of our cross-sectional study design using the NIS dataset, we were unable to examine whether cannabis use begins before the opioid use. Also, socioeconomic status, depression, and anxiety were reported to be associated with an increased risk of persistent opioid use at 1 year following the intervention in this group.[13,32] A recent study revealed about 50% of patients undergoing spinal surgery might be consuming opioids at the time of the surgical procedures, and 20% of this population may be opioid-dependent.[29]

Limitations and Strengths

As this study was a retrospective review of hospital discharge-based data, there are several significant limitations. First, this study only included discharge data and no actual medical assessments. Besides, the hospital discharge-based database does not provide information on actual consumption, dosage, or use patterns of the opioids, cannabis, or other substances. Second, we relied on ICD-9-CM codes that, to a certain extent, may have limited accuracy in capturing the actual person who used opioid, cannabis, and other substances with or without mental health conditions because of incorrect coding or missing data from coding practices and awareness of clinician's differences.[15] Furthermore, the identification of persons who used illicit drugs with mental health conditions was significantly underestimated, considering low sensitivity and high specificity in weighted estimates from discharge dataset.[33] This study cannot address the potential for unrecognized coding errors or unreported events that could influence the results. Third, our analysis could not fully specify the severity and onset of spinal diseases as well as time since spinal surgeries or procedures. Also, the temporal relationship, that is, the opioid-use disorders occurred before admission and was the cause of hospitalization, or occurred during the hospitalization, as an unintended overdose from the hospital-prescribed medication, was not investigated. Future studies need to consider this information using other datasets. Lastly, we did not fully interpret factors associated with opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment and variables (sex, income) because of insufficient precedent studies explaining clinical and policy implications of these findings. Given the extensive and recent data from the nationally representative dataset, we believe that temporal trends and associated factors of opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment are likelily generalizable to most patients with spinal diseases. In summary, this study shows that opioid-use disorders among hospitalized patients with spinal conditions and treatment steadily increased from 2005 to 2014 in US hospitals. This trend was associated with cannabis and other substance-use disorders, mental health conditions, younger age, white race, higher household income, and public insurance or uninsured. Previous studies reported that chronic opioid use or preoperative opioid prescription for patients with spinal conditions and treatment increased the risk of opioid-related hospitalization or postoperative readmission. This study shows that opioid-use disorders increased by 6.47% annually among patients with spinal diseases from 2005 to 2014 in US hospitals. This increasing rate of opioid-use disorder was associated with the cannabis-use disorder, younger age, white race, male sex, higher income, and public insurance, and uninsured.
  23 in total

1.  Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2017.

Authors:  Holly Hedegaard; Arialdi M Miniño; Margaret Warner
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2018-11

2.  Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999-2016.

Authors:  Holly Hedegaard; Margaret Warner; Arialdi M Miniño
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2017-12

3.  United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Patrick R Olson; Kristen K Bronner; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  An international comparison of back surgery rates.

Authors:  D C Cherkin; R A Deyo; J D Loeser; T Bush; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Validation of the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group (APR-DRG) Risk of Mortality and Severity of Illness Modifiers as a Measure of Perioperative Risk.

Authors:  Patrick J McCormick; Hung-Mo Lin; Stacie G Deiner; Matthew A Levin
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Preoperative Opioid Use as a Predictor of Adverse Postoperative Self-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Dennis Lee; Sheyan Armaghani; Kristin R Archer; Jesse Bible; David Shau; Harrison Kay; Chi Zhang; Matthew J McGirt; Clinton Devin
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Opioid Utilization Following Lumbar Arthrodesis: Trends and Factors Associated With Long-term Use.

Authors:  Piyush Kalakoti; Nathan R Hendrickson; Nicholas A Bedard; Andrew J Pugely
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Risk Factors for Prolonged Opioid Use Following Spine Surgery, and the Association with Surgical Intensity, Among Opioid-Naive Patients.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Kenneth Nwosu; Wei Jiang; Allan L Yau; Muhammad Ali Chaudhary; Rebecca E Scully; Tracey Koehlmoos; James D Kang; Adil H Haider
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Validation of key behaviourally based mental health diagnoses in administrative data: suicide attempt, alcohol abuse, illicit drug abuse and tobacco use.

Authors:  Hyungjin Myra Kim; Eric G Smith; Claire M Stano; Dara Ganoczy; Kara Zivin; Heather Walters; Marcia Valenstein
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Impact of the Economic Downturn on Elective Lumbar Spine Surgery in the United States: A National Trend Analysis, 2003 to 2013.

Authors:  David N Bernstein; David Brodell; Yue Li; Paul T Rubery; Addisu Mesfin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Analyzing the Impact of Cannabinoids on the Treatment of Spinal Disorders.

Authors:  Rohan M Shah; Anjay Saklecha; Alpesh A Patel; Srikanth N Divi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2022-02-08

2.  The relationship between patients' income and education and their access to pharmacological chronic pain management: A scoping review.

Authors:  Nicole Atkins; Karim Mukhida
Journal:  Can J Pain       Date:  2022-09-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.