Literature DB >> 8073310

An international comparison of back surgery rates.

D C Cherkin1, R A Deyo, J D Loeser, T Bush, G Waddell.   

Abstract

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although high geographic variation in back surgery rates within the United States have been documented, international comparisons have not been published.
METHODS: The authors compared rates of back surgery in eleven developed countries to determine if back surgery rates are higher: 1) in the United States than in other developed countries, 2) in countries with more neurologic and orthopaedic surgeons per capita, and 3) in countries with higher rates of other surgical procedures. Data on back surgery rates and physician supply were obtained from health agencies within these eleven countries. Country-specific rates of other surgical procedures were available from published sources.
RESULTS: The rate of back surgery in the United States was at least 40% higher than in any other country and was more than five times those in England and Scotland. Back surgery rates increased almost linearly with the per capita supply of orthopaedic and neurosurgeons in the country. Countries with high back surgery rates also had high rates of other discretionary procedures such as tonsillectomy and hysterectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate the potentially large impact of health system differences on rates of back surgery. Better outcome studies, however, are needed to determine whether Americans are being subjected to excessive surgery or if those in other developed countries are suffering because back surgery is underutilized.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8073310     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199405310-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  80 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; S Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-17

2.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  T Ibrahim; I M Tleyjeh; O Gabbar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  United States' trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992-2003.

Authors:  James N Weinstein; Jon D Lurie; Patrick R Olson; Kristen K Bronner; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Healthcare technology and technology assessment.

Authors:  James H Herndon; Raymond Hwang; K J Bozic; K H Bozic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Prescribing of schedule II pain medications in ambulatory medical care settings.

Authors:  L A Rose; B M Devellis; G Howard; E Mutran
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-09

6.  Tracking patients with chronic occipital headache after occipital nerve decompression surgery: A case series.

Authors:  Pamela Blake; Rony-Reuven Nir; Carlton J Perry; Rami Burstein
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 6.292

7.  Prescriptive clinical prediction rules in back pain research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephen May; Richard Rosedale
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

8.  Fighting to help lower costs: Making a financial case for chiropractic.

Authors:  Jc Smith
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2002

9.  Descriptive epidemiology and prior healthcare utilization of patients in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial's (SPORT) three observational cohorts: disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Justin Cummins; Jon D Lurie; Tor D Tosteson; Brett Hanscom; William A Abdu; Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Harry Herkowitz; James Weinstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The outcome of a functional restoration programme for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  M Sivan; B Sell; P Sell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.