| Literature DB >> 31849808 |
Pasquale Romanelli1,2, Lara Bieler1,2, Cornelia Scharler2,3, Karin Pachler2,4, Christina Kreutzer1,2, Pia Zaunmair1,2, Dominika Jakubecova1,2, Heike Mrowetz2,5, Bruno Benedetti1,2, Francisco J Rivera2,5,6,7, Ludwig Aigner2,5,8, Eva Rohde2,4,9, Mario Gimona2,4, Dirk Strunk2,3, Sebastien Couillard-Despres1,2,8.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury is characterized by initial neural tissue disruption that triggers secondary damage and extensive non-resolving inflammation, which aggravates loss of function and hinders recovery. The early onset of inflammation following traumatic spinal cord injury underscores the importance of acute intervention after the initial trauma. Injections of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) can reduce inflammation following spinal cord injury. We asked if extracellular vesicles (EVs) can substitute the anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring activities of their parental MSCs in a rat model of contusion spinal cord injury. We report that MSC-EVs were as potent as the parental intact cells in reducing the level of neuroinflammation for up to 2 weeks post-injury. Acute application of EVs after spinal cord injury was shown to robustly decrease the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the spinal cord parenchyma in the very early phase of secondary damage. Moreover, the anti-scarring impact of MSC-EVs was even more efficient than the parental cells. We therefore conclude that anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring activities of MSC application can be mediated by their secreted EVs. In light of their substantial safety and druggability advantages, EVs may have a high potential in early therapeutic treatment following traumatic spinal cord injury.Entities:
Keywords: exosome; inflammation; mesenchymal stromal cells; scarring; spinal cord injury
Year: 2019 PMID: 31849808 PMCID: PMC6896947 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Representative micrographs of the spinal cord of rats from the sham group (A–D) and rats which received a spinal cord injury (2 mm rostral from the epicenter) (E–H). Scale bar in (A,E) = 500 μm. Scale bar in (B,C,F,G) = 50 μm. Scale bar in (D,H) = 10 μm. (A,E) Immunodetection of Iba1-expressing microglia (green). (B,F) larger magnifications of the dashed lined area of the anterior commissure shown in (A,E). (C,G) larger magnifications of the dashed lined area of the ventral horn shown in (A,E). (D) The surveillance microglia shows a small soma size with long filigreed processes. (H) Activated microglia exhibits an amoeboid morphology with a larger soma and few stunted processes. (A–H) Nuclear counterstain was obtained with DAPI (blue). The density of Iba1-expressing cells was quantified 2 weeks after tSCI at 2 mm and 3 mm both rostral and caudal from the lesion epicenter in (I) the ventral horn and in (J) the anterior commissure. The equivalent positions along the rostro–caudal axis were used to measure the density of Iba1-expressing cells in the spinal cord of the sham group. (I,J) Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test. Statistical significances of column linked by horizontal lines *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; and ***p ≤ 0.001. (K) Impact of hUC-MSC-EVs on the expression level of pro-inflammatory genes after LPS activation in rat primary microglia. Ppia and TBP were used as non-regulated genes for standardization. Groups were compared using repeated measurement one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test. Statistical significances compared to the PBS group #p ≤ 0.05; ##p ≤ 0.01; statistical significances compared to the LPS group *p ≤ 0.05. (L) Impact of hUC-MSC-EVs on the expression level of pro-inflammatory genes after tSCI. Ppia and TBP were used as non-regulated genes for standardization. Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test. Statistical significances compared to the sham group ###p ≤ 0.001; statistical significances compared to the vehicle group **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001.
Summary of histological measurements for each group.
| 2 mm | 12,276 ± 1,234 | 39,410 ± 5,922 | 29,419 ± 4,819 | 27,955 ± 4,393 |
| 3 mm | 13,112 ± 2,521 | 31,653 ± 3,327 | 23,652 ± 1,285 | 23,108 ± 2,957 |
| 2 mm | 13,078 ± 2,399 | 29,772 ± 5,941 | 20,788 ± 5,005 | 19,518 ± 3,372 |
| 3 mm | 12,830 ± 1,386 | 21,549 ± 4,476 | 15,578 ± 2,850 | 16,964 ± 2,892 |
| <150 μm2 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.75 ± 0.04 | 0.76 ± 0.05n.s., ### | 0.75 ± 0.04n.s., ### |
| ≥150 μm2 | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.05n.s., ### | 0.25 ± 0.04n.s., ### |
| <150 μm2 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.75 ± 0.03 | 0.76 ± 0.04n.s., ### | 0.75 ± 0.04n.s., ### |
| ≥150 μm2 | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 0.25 ± 0.04 | 0.24 ± 0.04n.s., ### | 0.24 ± 0.04n.s., ### |
| 46.8 ± 7.4 | 294.8 ± 82.1 | 285.9 ± 62.6n.s., ### | 220.5 ± 57.2n.s., ### | |
| 17,178 ± 2,243 | 19,908 ± 5,212n.s. | 20,228 ± 5,613n.s., n.s. | 20,541 ± 3,521n.s., n.s. | |
| 2.2 ± 0.7 | 14.4 ± 8.6 | 5.5 ± 3.2**, | 5.7 ± 2.5**, | |
| 29,011 ± 15,903 | 2,203,763 ± 936,900 | 1,503,775 ± 853,435n.s., ## | 959,715 ± 560,646 **, | |
| 38.3 ± 3.05 | 21.2 ± 2.2 | 20.8 ± 3.7n.s., ### | 21.6 ± 3.0n.s., ### | |
| 52.3 ± 5.8 | 32.4 ± 6.4#, n.s. | 36.4 ± 11.1n.s., n.s. | 38.2 ± 9.8n.s., n.s. | |
| 538,731 ± 43,789 | 3,690,575 ± 527,086 | 2,993,413 ± 637,420###, n.s. | 2,735,803 ± 682,481###, * | |
Statistical significant differences to the sham group are marked with
p ≤ 0.05;
p ≤ 0.01; and
p ≤ 0.001. Statistical significant to differences to the vehicle are marked with
p ≤ 0.05;
p ≤ 0.01; and
p ≤ 0.001. Non-significant differences are marked with n.s.
Figure 2Immunodetection of various markers expressed in the spinal cord of a sham rat (A–D) and in a rat following tSCI (E–H). Immunodetection of GFAP-expressing astrocytes in the ventral horn of sham operated and injured rats (2 mm rostral from the epicenter) (A,E). Scale bar (A,E) = 50 μm, ventral horn deliminated with dashed lines. Immunodetection of Collagen I in the spinal cord of sham and injured rats (lesion epicenter) (B,F). Immunodetection of NG2-CSPGs in the spinal cord of sham and injured rats (lesion epicenter) (C,G). Immunodetection of ChAT-expressing motor neurons (white, yellow arrows) and Iba1-expressing microglia (red) in the spinal cord of sham and injured rats (2 mm rostral from the epicenter) (D,H). Nuclear counterstain with DAPI (blue). Scale bar (D,H) = 100 μm, ventral horn deliminated with dashed lines. (I) Percentage of area covered by GFAP at 2 and 3 mm rostral and caudal from the lesion epicenter in the ventral horn. Total area covered by Collagen I (J) and NG2-CSPG (K) depositions were quantified on spinal cord sections ranging from 3 mm rostral to 3 mm caudal from the lesion epicenter. The equivalent positions along the rostro–caudal axis were used to measure the area covered by collagen I and CSPG-NG2 in the spinal cord of the sham group. (L) Total number of ChAT+ motor neurons quantified in the ventral horns of the spinal cords at 2 and 3 mm both rostral and caudal from the lesion epicenter and at the equivalent positions along the rostro–caudal axis of the sham operated rats. (I–L) Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test. Statistical significances compared to sham group: ##p ≤ 0.01; ###p ≤ 0.001, statistical significances compared to vehicle group: *p ≤ 0.05; and **p ≤ 0.01.
Figure 3(A) Representative immunodetection of GFAP on cross-sections along the rostro–caudal axis of the spinal cord, 2 weeks after tSCI. Scale bar = 200 μm. (B) Total volume of spared spinal cord parenchyma calculated from 3 mm rostral to 3 mm caudal to the lesion epicenter or the equivalent position in the sham rats. Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test. Statistical significances compared to sham group: ###p ≤ 0.001.