Literature DB >> 27349274

Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers To Stratify Injury Severity and Predict Outcome in Human Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.

Brian K Kwon1,2, Femke Streijger2, Nader Fallah3,4, Vanessa K Noonan1,3, Lise M Bélanger5, Leanna Ritchie5, Scott J Paquette6, Tamir Ailon6, Michael C Boyd6, John Street1, Charles G Fisher1, Marcel F Dvorak1.   

Abstract

Neurologic impairment after spinal cord injury (SCI) is currently measured and classified by functional examination. Biological markers that objectively classify injury severity and predict outcome would greatly facilitate efforts to evaluate acute SCI therapies. The purpose of this study was to determine how well inflammatory and structural proteins within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of acute traumatic SCI patients predicted American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade conversion and motor score improvement over 6 months. Fifty acute SCI patients (29 AIS A, 9 AIS B, 12 AIS C; 32 cervical, 18 thoracic) were enrolled and CSF obtained through lumbar intrathecal catheters to analyze interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-1, tau, S100β, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) at 24 h post-injury. The levels of IL-6, tau, S100β, and GFAP were significantly different between patients with baseline AIS grades of A, B, or C. The levels of all proteins (IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, tau, S100β, and GFAP) were significantly different between those who improved an AIS grade over 6 months and those who did not improve. Linear discriminant analysis modeling was 83% accurate in predicting AIS conversion. For AIS A patients, the concentrations of proteins such as IL-6 and S100β correlated with conversion to AIS B or C. Motor score improvement also was strongly correlated with the 24-h post-injury CSF levels of all six biomarkers. The analysis of CSF can provide valuable biological information about injury severity and recovery potential after acute SCI. Such biological markers may be valuable tools for stratifying individuals in acute clinical trials where variability in spontaneous recovery requires large recruitment cohorts for sufficient power.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; cerebrospinal fluid; injury severity; neurological recovery; spinal cord injury

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27349274     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  37 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury: from Prognosis to Treatment.

Authors:  Leonardo Fonseca Rodrigues; Vivaldo Moura-Neto; Tania Cristina Leite de Sampaio E Spohr
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Identification of serum exosomal microRNAs in acute spinal cord injured rats.

Authors:  Shu-Qin Ding; Jing Chen; Sai-Nan Wang; Fei-Xiang Duan; Yu-Qing Chen; Yu-Jiao Shi; Jian-Guo Hu; He-Zuo Lü
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-08-26

Review 3.  Adaptive trial designs for spinal cord injury clinical trials directed to the central nervous system.

Authors:  James D Guest; John D Steeves; M J Mulcahey; Linda A T Jones; Frank Rockhold; Rϋediger Rupp; John L K Kramer; Steven Kirshblum; Andrew Blight; Daniel Lammertse
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 4.  Assessments of sensory plasticity after spinal cord injury across species.

Authors:  Jenny Haefeli; J Russell Huie; Kazuhito Morioka; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  New astroglial injury-defined biomarkers for neurotrauma assessment.

Authors:  Julia Halford; Sean Shen; Kyohei Itamura; Jaclynn Levine; Albert C Chong; Gregg Czerwieniec; Thomas C Glenn; David A Hovda; Paul Vespa; Ross Bullock; W Dalton Dietrich; Stefania Mondello; Joseph A Loo; Ina-Beate Wanner
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 6.  The developing landscape of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for spinal cord injury in cerebrospinal fluid and blood.

Authors:  C H Hulme; S J Brown; H R Fuller; J Riddell; A Osman; J Chowdhury; N Kumar; W E Johnson; K T Wright
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 7.  Neurochemical biomarkers in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Brian K Kwon; Ona Bloom; Ina-Beate Wanner; Armin Curt; Jan M Schwab; James Fawcett; Kevin K Wang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 8.  Omega-3 fatty acids in the treatment of spinal cord injury: untapped potential for therapeutic intervention?

Authors:  Paweł Turczyn; Piotr Wojdasiewicz; Łukasz A Poniatowski; Daryush Purrahman; Maria Maślińska; Grzegorz Żurek; Katarzyna Romanowska-Próchnicka; Beata Żuk; Brygida Kwiatkowska; Bartłomiej Piechowski-Jóźwiak; Dariusz Szukiewicz
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.742

9.  Acute intermittent hypoxia as a potential adjuvant to improve walking following spinal cord injury: evidence, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Andrew Quesada Tan; Stella Barth; Randy D Trumbower
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2020-06-24

Review 10.  Improving Diagnostic Workup Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Advances in Biomarkers.

Authors:  Simon Schading; Tim M Emmenegger; Patrick Freund
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.