Karen H Seal1,2, Tessa Rife3,4, Yongmei Li3, Carolyn Gibson3,4, Jennifer Tighe3. 1. San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Karen.Seal@va.gov. 2. Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. Karen.Seal@va.gov. 3. San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Departments of Medicine and Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: National guidelines advise decreasing opioids for chronic pain, but there is no guidance on implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an Integrated Pain Team (IPT) clinic in decreasing opioid dose and mitigating opioid risk. DESIGN: This study prospectively compared two matched cohorts receiving chronic pain care through IPT (N = 147) versus usual primary care (UPC, N = 147) over 6 months. Patients were matched on age, sex, psychiatric diagnoses, and baseline opioid dose. PATIENTS: Veterans receiving care at a VA medical center or VA community-based clinics. INTERVENTION: Interdisciplinary IPT, consisting of a collocated medical provider, psychologist, and pharmacist embedded in VA primary care providing short-term biopsychosocial management of veterans with chronic pain and problematic opioid use. MAIN MEASURES: Change in opioid dose expressed as morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and opioid risk mitigation evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. KEY RESULTS: Compared with veterans receiving UPC, those followed by IPT had a greater mean MEDD decrease of 42 mg versus 8 mg after 3 months and 56 mg versus 17 mg after 6 months. In adjusted analysis, compared with UPC, veterans in IPT achieved a 34-mg greater mean reduction at 3 months (p = 0.002) and 38-mg greater mean reduction at 6 months (p = 0.003). Nearly twice as many patients receiving care through IPT versus UPC reduced their daily opioid dose by ≥50%, representing more than a two-fold improvement at 3 months, which was sustained at 6 months [odds ratio = 2.03; 95% CI = 1.04-3.95, p = 0.04]. Significant improvements were also demonstrated in opioid risk mitigation by 6 months, including increased urine drug screen monitoring, naloxone kit distribution, and decreased co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines (all p values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary biopsychosocial models of pain care can be embedded in primary care and lead to significant improvements in opioid dose and risk mitigation.
BACKGROUND: National guidelines advise decreasing opioids for chronic pain, but there is no guidance on implementation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an Integrated Pain Team (IPT) clinic in decreasing opioid dose and mitigating opioid risk. DESIGN: This study prospectively compared two matched cohorts receiving chronic pain care through IPT (N = 147) versus usual primary care (UPC, N = 147) over 6 months. Patients were matched on age, sex, psychiatric diagnoses, and baseline opioid dose. PATIENTS: Veterans receiving care at a VA medical center or VA community-based clinics. INTERVENTION: Interdisciplinary IPT, consisting of a collocated medical provider, psychologist, and pharmacist embedded in VA primary care providing short-term biopsychosocial management of veterans with chronic pain and problematic opioid use. MAIN MEASURES: Change in opioid dose expressed as morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) and opioid risk mitigation evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. KEY RESULTS: Compared with veterans receiving UPC, those followed by IPT had a greater mean MEDD decrease of 42 mg versus 8 mg after 3 months and 56 mg versus 17 mg after 6 months. In adjusted analysis, compared with UPC, veterans in IPT achieved a 34-mg greater mean reduction at 3 months (p = 0.002) and 38-mg greater mean reduction at 6 months (p = 0.003). Nearly twice as many patients receiving care through IPT versus UPC reduced their daily opioid dose by ≥50%, representing more than a two-fold improvement at 3 months, which was sustained at 6 months [odds ratio = 2.03; 95% CI = 1.04-3.95, p = 0.04]. Significant improvements were also demonstrated in opioid risk mitigation by 6 months, including increased urine drug screen monitoring, naloxone kit distribution, and decreased co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines (all p values < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary biopsychosocial models of pain care can be embedded in primary care and lead to significant improvements in opioid dose and risk mitigation.
Authors: Roger Chou; Judith A Turner; Emily B Devine; Ryan N Hansen; Sean D Sullivan; Ian Blazina; Tracy Dana; Christina Bougatsos; Richard A Deyo Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Elizabeth M Oliva; Thomas Bowe; Sara Tavakoli; Susana Martins; Eleanor T Lewis; Meenah Paik; Ilse Wiechers; Patricia Henderson; Michael Harvey; Tigran Avoundjian; Amanuel Medhanie; Jodie A Trafton Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2017-02
Authors: Benjamin J Oldfield; Ellen L Edens; Alicia Agnoli; Curtis W Bone; Dana J Cervone; Sara N Edmond; Ajay Manhapra; John J Sellinger; William C Becker Journal: Pain Med Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Karen H Seal; William C Becker; Jennifer L Murphy; Natalie Purcell; Lauren M Denneson; Benjamin J Morasco; Aaron M Martin; Kavitha Reddy; Theresa Van Iseghem; Erin E Krebs; Jacob M Painter; Hildi Hagedorn; Jeffrey M Pyne; John Hixon; Shira Maguen; Thomas C Neylan; Brian Borsari; Beth DeRonne; Carolyn Gibson; Marianne S Matthias; Joseph W Frank; Akshaya Krishnaswamy; Yongmei Li; Daniel Bertenthal; Allan Chan; Alejandro Nunez; Nicole McCamish Journal: Pain Med Date: 2020-12-12 Impact factor: 3.750