Literature DB >> 33313734

Whole Health Options and Pain Education (wHOPE): A Pragmatic Trial Comparing Whole Health Team vs Primary Care Group Education to Promote Nonpharmacological Strategies to Improve Pain, Functioning, and Quality of Life in Veterans-Rationale, Methods, and Implementation.

Karen H Seal1,2, William C Becker3,4, Jennifer L Murphy5,6, Natalie Purcell1,2, Lauren M Denneson7,8, Benjamin J Morasco7,8, Aaron M Martin5, Kavitha Reddy9,10, Theresa Van Iseghem9, Erin E Krebs11,12, Jacob M Painter13,14, Hildi Hagedorn11,12, Jeffrey M Pyne13,14, John Hixon1,2, Shira Maguen1,2, Thomas C Neylan1,2, Brian Borsari1,2, Beth DeRonne11, Carolyn Gibson1,2, Marianne S Matthias15,16, Joseph W Frank17,18, Akshaya Krishnaswamy1, Yongmei Li1, Daniel Bertenthal1, Allan Chan1, Alejandro Nunez1, Nicole McCamish1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Whole Health model of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) emphasizes holistic self-care and multimodal approaches to improve pain, functioning, and quality of life. wHOPE (Whole Health Options and Pain Education) seeks to be the first multisite pragmatic trial to establish evidence for the VA Whole Health model for chronic pain care.
DESIGN: wHOPE is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial comparing a Whole Health Team (WHT) approach to Primary Care Group Education (PC-GE); both will be compared to Usual VA Primary Care (UPC). The WHT consists of a medical provider, a complementary and integrative health (CIH) provider, and a Whole Health coach, who collaborate with VA patients to create a Personalized Health Plan emphasizing CIH approaches to chronic pain management. The active comparator, PC-GE, is adapted group cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain. The first aim is to test whether the WHT approach is superior to PC-GE and whether both are superior to UPC in decreasing pain interference in functioning in 750 veterans with moderate to severe chronic pain (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes include changes in pain severity, quality of life, mental health symptoms, and use of nonpharmacological and pharmacological therapies for pain. Outcomes will be collected from the VA electronic health record and patient-reported data over 12 months of follow-up. Aim 2 consists of an implementation-focused process evaluation and budget impact analysis.
SUMMARY: This trial is part of the Pain Management Collaboratory, which seeks to create national-level infrastructure to support evidence-based nonpharmacological pain management approaches for veterans and military service personnel. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. This work is written by a US Government employee and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic Pain; Cognitive Behavior Therapy; Complementary and Integrative Health; Pragmatic Trial; Primary Care; Veterans

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33313734      PMCID: PMC7825011          DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  18 in total

Review 1.  The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management?

Authors:  R E Glasgow; H G McKay; J D Piette; K D Reynolds
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-08

2.  A randomized controlled trial of telephone motivational interviewing to enhance mental health treatment engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

Authors:  Karen H Seal; Linda Abadjian; Nicole McCamish; Ying Shi; Gary Tarasovsky; Kenneth Weingardt
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 3.238

3.  Optimizing pain treatment interventions (OPTI): A pilot randomized controlled trial of collaborative care to improve chronic pain management and opioid safety-Rationale, methods, and lessons learned.

Authors:  Karen H Seal; Brian Borsari; Jennifer Tighe; Beth E Cohen; Kevin Delucchi; Benjamin J Morasco; Yongmei Li; Emily Sachs; Linda Abadjian; Erin C Watson; Jennifer K Manuel; Lea Vella; Jodie Trafton; Amanda Midboe
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Whole health: the vision and implementation of personalized, proactive, patient-driven health care for veterans.

Authors:  Laura P Krejci; Kennita Carter; Tracy Gaudet
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Health Coaching to Enhance Psychological Well-being Among Veterans with Suicidal Ideation: a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Lauren M Denneson; Amira Y Trevino; Emily A Kenyon; Sarah S Ono; Paul N Pfeiffer; Steven K Dobscha
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Evaluation of Stepped Care for Chronic Pain (ESCAPE) in Veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan Conflicts: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Matthew J Bair; Dennis Ang; Jingwei Wu; Samantha D Outcalt; Christy Sargent; Carol Kempf; Amanda Froman; Arlene A Schmid; Teresa M Damush; Zhangsheng Yu; Louanne W Davis; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Per-Protocol Analyses of Pragmatic Trials.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Communicating about opioids for chronic pain: a qualitative study of patient attributions and the influence of the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  M S Matthias; E E Krebs; A A Bergman; J M Coffing; M J Bair
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 9.  Biopsychosocial Approach to Assessing and Managing Patients with Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Martin D Cheatle
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.456

10.  Tailored to Fit: How an Implementation Framework Can Support Pragmatic Pain Care Trial Adaptation for Diverse Veterans Affairs Clinical Settings.

Authors:  Natalie Purcell; William C Becker; Kara A Zamora; Sarah L McGrath; Hildi J Hagedorn; Eva R Fabian; Nicole McCamish; Karen H Seal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.178

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of complex, partially nested clustering in a three-arm individually randomized group treatment trial: A case study with the wHOPE trial.

Authors:  Guangyu Tong; Karen H Seal; William C Becker; Fan Li; James D Dziura; Peter N Peduzzi; Denise A Esserman
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.486

2.  Justice and equity in pragmatic clinical trials: Considerations for pain research within integrated health systems.

Authors:  Joseph Ali; Alison F Davis; Diana J Burgess; Daniel I Rhon; Robert Vining; Stacey Young-McCaughan; Sean Green; Robert D Kerns
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2021-10-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.