| Literature DB >> 31848376 |
Avinash Singh Patel1, Abhijit Kar2, Sukanta Dash3, Sanjaya K Dash4.
Abstract
Study ascertained the recovery of β-carotene from enzyme-treated (enzyme load of 167 U/g) pericarp of ripe bitter melon using supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) technique. Effect of different pressure (ranged from 150-450 bar), carbon dioxide (CO2) flow rates (ranged from 15 to 55 ml/min), temperatures (from 50 to 90 °C), and extraction periods (from 45-225 minutes) were observed on the extraction efficiency of β-carotene. Results showed that extraction pressure (X1) among extraction parameters had the most significant (p < 0.05) effect on extraction efficiency of the β-carotene followed by allowed extraction time (X4), CO2 flow rate (X2) and the temperature of the extraction (X3). The maximum yield of 90.12% of β-carotene from lyophilized enzymatic pretreated ripe bitter melon pericarp was achieved at the pressure of approx. 390 bar, flow rate of 35 mL/min, temperature at 70 °C and extraction time of 190 min, respectively. Based on the accelerated storage study the 70% retention shelf life of the β-carotene into extract was estimated up to 2.27 months at 10 °C and up to 3.21 months at 5 °C.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31848376 PMCID: PMC6917792 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-55481-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SFE process flowchart used in the extraction of β-carotene from the ripe bitter melon pericarp.
Central composite rotatable design (CCRD) showing independent variables, their levels and responses.
| Independent variables | Symbols | Coded variable levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −2 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Pressure (bar) | X1 | 150 | 225 | 300 | 375 | 450 |
| Flow rate (mL/min) | X2 | 15 | 25 | 35 | 45 | 55 |
| Temperature (°C) | X3 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 |
| Time (min) | X4 | 45 | 90 | 135 | 180 | 225 |
Central composite arrangement for independent variables.
| Run | Independent variables levels (coded) | Yield (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | Experimental | Predicted | |
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 2 | 30.13 | 33.51 |
| 2 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 45.44 | 42.50 |
| 3 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 76.12 | 75.67 |
| 4 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 48.84 | 43.14 |
| 5 | −1 | −2 | 1 | −1 | 35.46 | 36.02 |
| 6 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 51.60 | 54.63 |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 45.33 | 51.13 |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 84.77 | 81.51 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.51 | 76.53 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 78.48 | 76.53 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77.53 | 76.53 |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.69 | 76.53 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74.91 | 76.53 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 76.12 | 76.53 |
| 15 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 43.64 | 42.21 |
| 16 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 31.00 | 27.62 |
| 17 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 50.11 | 52.90 |
| 18 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 37.43 | 38.33 |
| 19 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 81.29 | 80.08 |
| 20 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 50.11 | 47.01 |
| 21 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 70.44 | 73.51 |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 55.34 | 56.45 |
| 23 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 68.26 | 69.81 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 64.96 | 63.56 |
| 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 80.02 | 74.43 |
| 26 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.81 | 20.54 |
| 27 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 37.79 | 40.87 |
| 28 | 0 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 41.71 | 38.77 |
| 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −2 | 45.41 | 38.19 |
| 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 64.57 | 71.95 |
Figure 2Supercritical fluid chromatography based UPC2 calibration curve (A) used in quantification of β-carotene extracted at the optimized condition and its chromatogram (B).
Analysis of variance of (ANOVA) independent variables for the extraction of β-carotene from the ripe bitter melon pericarp.
| Regression | Yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF | Sum of Squares | F-Value | Pr > F | |
| Linear | 4 | 6132.400179 | 65.36 | <0.0001 |
| Quadratic | 4 | 3613.201070 | 38.51 | <0.0001 |
| Cross product | 6 | 290.457584 | 2.06 | 0.1195 |
| Total Model | 14 | 10036 | 30.56 | <0.0001 |
| Lack of Fit | 10 | 343.518284 | 20.66 | 0.0019 |
| Pure Error | 5 | 8.315508 | — | — |
| Total Error | 15 | 351.833792 | — | — |
Note: R-Squares 0.9661, Degree of freedom (DF).
Figure 3A plot of predicted and experimental value for the % yield of β-carotene extracted from ripe bitter melon pericarp using SFE technique.
Figure 4Response surface plot showing effects of independent variables on % yield (A–F) from ripe bitter melon pericarp while the remaining were kept at the central point (pressure: X1 - 300 bar; flow rate: X2 - 35 mL/min; temperature: X3 – 70 °C; and time: X4 - 135 min).
Canonical analysis of response surface based on coded data for TBC and yield.
| Factor | Critical Value | Coding Coefficients | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coded | Un-coded | Subtracted off | Divided by | |
| X1 | 0.62 | 393.32 | 300.00 | 150.00 |
| X2 | 0.099 | 36.98 | 35.00 | 20.00 |
| X3 | −0.04 | 69.15 | 70.00 | 20.00 |
| X4 | 0.62 | 190.36 | 135.00 | 90.00 |
Predicted value at the stationary point for % yield = 90.11.
Figure 5An estimated ridge of maximum response for variable % yield.
Figure 6Effect of temperature 55 °C (A) and 45 °C (B) percentage loss and TBC extracted from ripe bitter melon pericarp at optimum condition.