| Literature DB >> 31848329 |
Jun Li1, Yafei Guo2, Qingju Li1, Keke Miao3, Chongxian Wang1, Dongming Zhang1, Chenguang Tian1, Suhe Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine the association between white matter lesions (WML) and diabetes-associated cognitive decline (DACD) in rat models of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty Sprague-Dawley male rats were divided into 4 groups: control, control+metformin, T2DM, and T2DM+metformin groups. The T2DM groups were fed a diet high in fat and glucose to induce impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and then were injected with streptozotocin to induce T2DM. The Morris water maze test was used to evaluate cognitive function. Brain diffusion tensor imaging scans were performed for WML. The expression of myelin basic protein (MBP), oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1 (OLIG1), and OLIG2 (markers of brain damage and repair) was determined using immunofluorescence. After IGT, the fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the right thalamus area were significantly lower in both T2DM groups compared with controls. RESULTS Eight weeks after streptozotocin injection, the FA values of the thalamus were lower in the T2DM (bilateral thalamus) group and T2DM+metformin (left thalamus) group than in controls, while the FA values in the left thalamus area were lower in the T2DM+metformin group than in the control and control+metformin groups. The maze escape latency was longer and the number of rats passing through the platform was smaller in the T2DM and T2DM+metformin groups than in the control group. MBP levels were lower and OLIG1 and OLIG2 levels were higher in both T2DM groups than in controls. CONCLUSIONS WML is associated with DACD and appears before the onset of T2DM and signs of DACD and plays a role in diabetes-associated cognitive decline. Metformin reduces WMLs but does not rescue cognitive dysfunction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31848329 PMCID: PMC6930701 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.918557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Biochemical and cognitive data of each group.
| Control group ( | Control+MET group ( | T2DM group ( | T2DM+MET group ( | Test value (F/χ2) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before group feeding | Weight (g) | 88.60±4.70 | 88.80±2.51 | 88.93±3.99 | 89.27±4.51 | 0.073 | 0.974 |
| DFBG (mmol/L) | 5.13±0.45 | 5.21±0.40 | 5.31±0.33 | 5.37±0.40 | 1.098 | 0.358 | |
| Escape latency (s) | 38.35 (18.75, 60.02) | 37.59 (22.14, 59.81) | 39.12 (14.56, 60.02) | 35.82 (14.15, 60.00) | 0.755 | 0.860 | |
| Number of rats passing through the platform | 2.00±1.69 | 2.13±1.55 | 2.00±0.76 | 2.25±1.58 | 0.034 | 0.991 | |
| FA (left) | 0.208±0.023 | 0.210±0.022 | 0.207±0.010 | 0.207±0.015 | 0.109 | 0.955 | |
| FA (right) | 0.209±0.017 | 0.210±0.012 | 0.200±0.009 | 0.200±0.009 | 1.776 | 0.162 | |
| 8 weeks after group feeding | Weight (g) | 475.47±16.70 | 475.33±11.82 | 497.87±17.16 | 494.27±16.80 | 8.711 | 0.001 |
| DFBG (mmol/L) | 5.25±0.37 | 5.34±0.37 | 7.31±0.96 | 6.98±0.76 | 39.370 | 0.001 | |
| Escape latency (s) | 8.12 (4.46, 18.87) | 9.79 (5.03, 15.98) | 8.09 (4.45, 20.48) | 7.69 (4.07, 25.36) | 2.209 | 0.530 | |
| Number of rats passing through the platform | 3.00±1.73 | 2.80±1.37 | 2.67±1.32 | 2.50±2.61 | 0.049 | 0.985 | |
| FA (left) | 0.227±0.010 | 0.226±0.013 | 0.216±0.019 | 0.221±0.015 | 1.776 | 0.162 | |
| FA (right) | 0.241±0.019 | 0.245±0.019 | 0.210±0.012 | 0.212±0.013 | 19.947 | 0.001 | |
| 8 weeks after using STZ | Weight (g) | 486.73±17.61 | 485.73±11.59 | 478.53±12.74 | 490.27±13.85 | 1.821 | 0.154 |
| AFBG (mmol/L) | 5.61±0.34 | 5.46±0.62 | 18.98±1.24 | 14.25±3.31 | 206.789 | 0.001 | |
| Escape latency (s) | 8.91 (5.03, 26.67) | 8.56 (5.67, 28.47) | 40.19 (21.05, 60.02) | 28.47 (18.84, 60.02) | 15.576 | 0.001 | |
| Number of rats passing through the platform | 3.53±0.99 | 3.80±1.08 | 1.93±1.34 | 2.27±1.39 | 8.692 | 0.001 | |
| FA (left) | 0.263±0.026 | 0.266±0.019 | 0.224±0.020 | 0.238±0.013 | 15.615 | 0.001 | |
| FA (right) | 0.267±0.030 | 0.267±0.023 | 0.235±0.011 | 0.266±0.019 | 7.631 | 0.001 | |
| HOMA-IR | 2.09±0.18 | 2.12±0.25 | 4.77±0.45 | 4.33±0.21 | 184.873 | 0.001 |
AFBG – arterial blood fasting blood glucose; DFBG – distal fasting blood glucose; FA – fractional anisotropy; HOMA-IR – homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.
Statistically significant difference compared with the control group;
statistically significant difference compared with the T2DM group;
Chi-square test value.
Results of the Morris water maze test in rats.
| Control group ( | T2DM group ( | T2DM+MET group ( | (F/χ2) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before group feeding | Escape latency (s) | 58.71 (22.14, 60.02) | 39.12 (14.55, 60.02) | 35.82 (14.15, 60.00) | 3.484 | 0.175 |
| Number of rats passing through the platform | 2.00 (0.25, 3.75) | 2.00 (1.00, 2.00) | 2.50 (0.5, 3.75) | 0.344 | 0.842 | |
| 8 weeks after group feeding | Escape latency (s) | 8.12 (4.46, 18.87) | 8.09 (4.45, 20.48) | 7.69 (4.07, 25.36) | 0.032 | 0.984 |
| Number of rats passing through the platform | 3.00±1.87 | 2.67±1.53 | 2.50±3.54 | 0.060 | 0.942 | |
| 8 weeks after using STZ | Escape latency (s) | 8.91 (5.03, 26.67) | 40.19 (21.05, 60.02) | 28.47 (18.84, 60.02) | 10.737 | 0.005 |
| Number of rats passing through the platform | 3.53±0.99 | 1.93±1.34 | 2.27±1.39 | 6.843 | 0.003 |
Statistically significant difference compared with the control group;
statistically significant difference compared with the T2DM group;
not normally distributed and presented as median (P25, P75).
Figure 1Representative swimming trajectories of rats before (left panel) and after training (right panel). Eight weeks after STZ injection, the swimming trajectory of the rats in the T2DM and T2DM+MET groups were obviously more chaotic than in the Control and Control+MET groups and did not improve after 5 days of training.
Fractional anisotropy of the bilateral thalamus in rats.
| Control group ( | T2DM group ( | T2DM+MET group ( | (F/χ2) | P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before group feeding | FA (left) | 0.208±0.023 | 0.207±0.010 | 0.207±0.015 | 0.023 | 0.977 |
| FA (right) | 0.208±0.017 | 0.201±0.009 | 0.202±0.009 | 1.620 | 0.210 | |
| 8 weeks after group feeding | FA (left) | 0.227±0.010 | 0.216±0.019 | 0.221±0.015 | 2.022 | 0.145 |
| FA (right) | 0.241±0.019 | 0.210±0.012 | 0.212±0.013 | 19.591 | <0.001 | |
| 8 weeks after using STZ | FA (left) | 0.263±0.032 | 0.224±0.020 | 0.238±0.014 | 16.057 | <0.001 |
| FA (right) | 0.267±0.035 | 0.235±0.010 | 0.266±0.020 | 14.287 | <0.001 |
FA – fractional anisotropy.
Statistically significant difference compared with the control group;
statistically significant difference compared with the T2DM group.
Figure 2Representative DTI images 8 weeks after STZ injection. The FA values of the bilateral thalamus area (white arrow) were detected. Obvious white matter damage could be seen in the bilateral thalamus area in rats in the T2DM group. The color bar on the left side represents FA values. From bottom to top, FA value increases gradually from blue to red. Control group: the white arrows indicate the bilateral thalamus. The left FA value was 0.285 and the right FA value was 0.322. Control+MET group: the white arrows indicate the bilateral thalamus. The left FA value was xxx and the right FA value was xxx. T2DM group: the white arrows indicate the bilateral thalamus. The left FA value was 0.229 and the right FA value was 0.219. T2DM+MET group: the white arrows indicate the bilateral thalamus. The left FA value was 0.265 and the right FA value was 0.271.
Figure 3Immunofluorescence images and quantification of MBP, OLIG1, and OLIG2 expression in each group. (A) The immunofluorescence of nuclei (blue) and MBP (green). (B) The MBP levels. (C) The immunofluorescence of nuclei (blue) and OLIG1 (red). (D) The OLIG1 levels in each group. (E) The immunofluorescence of nuclei (blue) and OLIG2 (red) in each group. (F) The OLIG2 levels.